"I Just Assumed This Was Already Being Done": Canadian Patient Preferences for Enhanced Data Sharing for Precision Oncology.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Samantha Pollard, Morgan Ehman, Anna Hermansen, Deirdre Weymann, Emanuel Krebs, Cheryl Ho, Howard J Lim, Steven Jones, Yvonne Bombard, Timothy P Hanna, Chiquita Hessels, Holly Longstaff, Robert Cook-Deegan, Tania Bubela, Dean A Regier
{"title":"\"I Just Assumed This Was Already Being Done\": Canadian Patient Preferences for Enhanced Data Sharing for Precision Oncology.","authors":"Samantha Pollard, Morgan Ehman, Anna Hermansen, Deirdre Weymann, Emanuel Krebs, Cheryl Ho, Howard J Lim, Steven Jones, Yvonne Bombard, Timothy P Hanna, Chiquita Hessels, Holly Longstaff, Robert Cook-Deegan, Tania Bubela, Dean A Regier","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In Canada, health data are siloed, slowing bioinnovation and evidence generation for personalized cancer care. Secured data-sharing platforms (SDSPs) can enable data analysis across silos through rapid concatenation across trial and real-world settings and timely researcher access. To motivate patient participation and trust in research, it is critical to ensure that SDSP design and oversight align with patients' values and address their concerns. We sought to qualitatively characterize patient preferences for the design of a pan-Canadian SDSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2022 and July 2023, we conducted pan-Canadian virtual focus groups with individuals who had a personal history of cancer. Following each focus group, participants were invited to provide feedback on early-phase analysis results via a member-checking survey. Three trained qualitative researchers analyzed data using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight individuals participated across five focus groups. Four focus groups were conducted in English and one in French. Thematic analysis generated two major and five minor themes. Analytic themes spanned personal and population implications of data sharing and willingness to manage perceived risks. Participants were supportive of increasing access to health data for precision oncology research, while voicing concerns about unintended data use, reidentification, and inequitable access to costly therapeutics. To mitigate perceived risks, participants highlighted the value of data access oversight and governance and informational transparency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strategies for secured data sharing should anticipate and mitigate the risks that patients perceive. Participants supported enhancing timely research capability while ensuring safeguards to protect patient autonomy and privacy. Our study informs the development of data-governance and data-sharing frameworks that integrate real-world and trial data, informed by evidence from direct patient input.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400184"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In Canada, health data are siloed, slowing bioinnovation and evidence generation for personalized cancer care. Secured data-sharing platforms (SDSPs) can enable data analysis across silos through rapid concatenation across trial and real-world settings and timely researcher access. To motivate patient participation and trust in research, it is critical to ensure that SDSP design and oversight align with patients' values and address their concerns. We sought to qualitatively characterize patient preferences for the design of a pan-Canadian SDSP.

Methods: Between January 2022 and July 2023, we conducted pan-Canadian virtual focus groups with individuals who had a personal history of cancer. Following each focus group, participants were invited to provide feedback on early-phase analysis results via a member-checking survey. Three trained qualitative researchers analyzed data using thematic analysis.

Results: Twenty-eight individuals participated across five focus groups. Four focus groups were conducted in English and one in French. Thematic analysis generated two major and five minor themes. Analytic themes spanned personal and population implications of data sharing and willingness to manage perceived risks. Participants were supportive of increasing access to health data for precision oncology research, while voicing concerns about unintended data use, reidentification, and inequitable access to costly therapeutics. To mitigate perceived risks, participants highlighted the value of data access oversight and governance and informational transparency.

Conclusion: Strategies for secured data sharing should anticipate and mitigate the risks that patients perceive. Participants supported enhancing timely research capability while ensuring safeguards to protect patient autonomy and privacy. Our study informs the development of data-governance and data-sharing frameworks that integrate real-world and trial data, informed by evidence from direct patient input.

"我只是假设这已经在做了":加拿大患者对加强精准肿瘤学数据共享的偏好。
目的:在加拿大,健康数据各自为政,减缓了个性化癌症治疗的生物创新和证据生成。安全的数据共享平台(SDSP)可以通过快速整合试验和真实世界环境中的数据,以及研究人员的及时访问,实现跨孤岛的数据分析。为了激励患者参与研究并提高他们对研究的信任,确保 SDSP 的设计和监督符合患者的价值观并解决他们关心的问题至关重要。我们试图定性分析患者对泛加拿大 SDSP 设计的偏好:2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,我们与有个人癌症病史的个人开展了泛加拿大虚拟焦点小组。每次焦点小组讨论结束后,我们都会邀请参与者通过成员检查调查对早期阶段的分析结果提供反馈意见。三位训练有素的定性研究人员采用主题分析法对数据进行了分析:共有 28 人参加了五个焦点小组。四个焦点小组以英语进行,一个以法语进行。专题分析产生了两个主要专题和五个次要专题。分析主题涉及数据共享对个人和群体的影响,以及管理感知风险的意愿。参与者支持为精准肿瘤学研究提供更多的健康数据,同时也表达了对意外数据使用、重新识别和不公平获取昂贵治疗药物的担忧。为降低预期风险,与会者强调了数据访问监督和管理以及信息透明度的价值:结论:安全的数据共享策略应预见并降低患者感知到的风险。与会者支持在确保保护患者自主权和隐私的同时提高及时研究能力。我们的研究为制定数据管理和数据共享框架提供了信息,该框架整合了真实世界和试验数据,并以患者直接输入的证据为依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信