Analytical interference in CA 19-9 immunoassay generates false-positive results in a young woman with a low-grade appendiceal tumor: An educational case report and brief literature review.

Abstract

CA 19-9 (carbohydrate antigen 19-9) is a tumor marker widely used for the follow-up of patients with pancreatic cancer and other digestive neoplasia. This case report describes a discrepancy between the results of serum CA 19-9 analyses using the Alinity analytical platform (Abbott™) and two other techniques, Kryptor Gold (ThermoFisher Scientific™) and Cobas E411 (Roche™), in the context of a young woman with appendiceal mucocele. In this context, when the serum concentration of CA 19-9 is high, it may raise concerns about potential malignancy or rupture of the mucocele that may lead to tumoral dissemination in the abdominal cavity. In the present case, we observed with Alinity a false elevation in CA 19-9 concentration at 190 kU/L (normal range < 37 kU/L) before appendix resection that continued to increase until reaching 619 kU/L six months after surgery. This situation led to unnecessary additional tests, increased hospitalization time and stress for the patient who also had to interrupt her medically assisted reproduction project. We solved this case using new measurements in CA 19-9 concentration with two other techniques, Kryptor Gold and Cobas E411, and we identified an analytical interference caused by the presence of heterophile antibodies. In all cases, abnormal result initially obtained with Alinity was found below normal range not only with the two other techniques but also with Alinity after a neutralisation step by using Heterophile Blocking Tubes (Scantibodies Laboratory™). Analytical interferences in medical tests can lead to inappropriate medical care. It is an important issue requiring a continuing training of biologists who must be aware of these problems, which are recurring concerns and are not always easy to identify in laboratories of medical biology, in particular when immunoassays are used. This case report also provides an opportunity to do a brief review of the literature and to remind some recommendations and actions to take into consideration in the presence of discrepancies between the clinic and the biology, in particular, one of them is to measure the biological analyte with a different technique. Moreover, the use of Heterophile Blocking Tubes neutralizing specifically the heterophile antibodies may be useful. In all cases, dialogue between clinicians and biologists remains essential.