Rehabilitation after musculoskeletal injury: European perspective.

Michael Kelly, Richard L Donovan, Zoe H Dailiana, Hans-Christophe Pape, Francisco Chana-Rodríguez, Carlotta Pari, Kornelis Jan Ponsen, Stefano Cattaneo, Alberto Belluati, Achille Contini, Jesús Gómez-Vallejo, Marta Casallo-Cerezo, Gijs J A Willinge, Ruben N van Veen, J Carel Gosling, Stamatios A N Papadakis, Efthymios Iliopoulos
{"title":"Rehabilitation after musculoskeletal injury: European perspective.","authors":"Michael Kelly, Richard L Donovan, Zoe H Dailiana, Hans-Christophe Pape, Francisco Chana-Rodríguez, Carlotta Pari, Kornelis Jan Ponsen, Stefano Cattaneo, Alberto Belluati, Achille Contini, Jesús Gómez-Vallejo, Marta Casallo-Cerezo, Gijs J A Willinge, Ruben N van Veen, J Carel Gosling, Stamatios A N Papadakis, Efthymios Iliopoulos","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma is one of the main causes of death in younger people and ongoing disability worldwide. In Europe, while there is generally good organization of trauma reception and acute treatment, rehabilitation from major musculoskeletal injuries is less well defined and provided. This article documents the diverse approaches to rehabilitation after major injury in 6 European nations. The recognition of need is universal, but achieving a robust rehabilitation strategy is more elusive across the varying health care systems. Switzerland has the most robust service in the insured population. In the other countries, particularly where there is a reliance on public institutes, this provision is at best patchy. In the Netherlands, innovative patient-empowering strategies have gained traction with notable success, and in the United Kingdom, a recent randomized trial also showed this approach to be reproducible and robust. Overall, there is a clear need for learning across the national systems and implementation of a minimum set of standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"7 5 Suppl","pages":"e330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trauma is one of the main causes of death in younger people and ongoing disability worldwide. In Europe, while there is generally good organization of trauma reception and acute treatment, rehabilitation from major musculoskeletal injuries is less well defined and provided. This article documents the diverse approaches to rehabilitation after major injury in 6 European nations. The recognition of need is universal, but achieving a robust rehabilitation strategy is more elusive across the varying health care systems. Switzerland has the most robust service in the insured population. In the other countries, particularly where there is a reliance on public institutes, this provision is at best patchy. In the Netherlands, innovative patient-empowering strategies have gained traction with notable success, and in the United Kingdom, a recent randomized trial also showed this approach to be reproducible and robust. Overall, there is a clear need for learning across the national systems and implementation of a minimum set of standards.

肌肉骨骼损伤后的康复:欧洲视角。
创伤是导致全世界年轻人死亡和持续残疾的主要原因之一。在欧洲,虽然创伤接收和急性治疗的组织工作普遍良好,但重大肌肉骨骼损伤后的康复工作却没有得到很好的界定和提供。本文记录了欧洲 6 个国家对重大创伤后康复采取的不同方法。对需求的认识是普遍的,但在不同的医疗保健系统中,要实现强有力的康复策略却比较困难。瑞士为投保人群提供了最健全的服务。而在其他国家,尤其是依赖公立机构的国家,这种服务充其量只能算是零散的。在荷兰,创新的患者赋权策略取得了显著的成功,而在英国,最近的一项随机试验也表明这种方法具有可重复性和稳健性。总体而言,显然有必要在国家系统内进行学习,并实施一套最低标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信