Combined Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction Is Associated With Reduced Time to Oncological Therapy Compared With ERCP and Sampling Alone.
James Gauci, Wei On, Bharat Paranandi, Matthew Thomas Huggett, Simon Everett
{"title":"Combined Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction Is Associated With Reduced Time to Oncological Therapy Compared With ERCP and Sampling Alone.","authors":"James Gauci, Wei On, Bharat Paranandi, Matthew Thomas Huggett, Simon Everett","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sampling techniques for pancreaticobiliary malignancy have modest yields that could lead to delays in treatment. We evaluated whether combining EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with ERCP improved time to first outpatient evaluation and treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients without a prior pathological diagnosis who underwent index ERCP at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom, for malignant distal biliary obstruction from 2015 to 2020 were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 patients were included, of whom 74.7% (n = 202) underwent EUS-TA/ERCP. A combined approach was more likely to establish a positive diagnosis (96.5% [n = 195] vs 57.8% [n = 52], P < 0.01) and less likely to require further sampling procedures (2.0% [n = 4] vs 17.8% [n = 16], P < 0.01). Mean times to first outpatient evaluation (16.9 vs 24.5 days [ P = 0.01]) and oncological treatment (55.1 vs 79.3 days [ P = 0.03]) were significantly shorter. A third (n = 86) of patients with a positive diagnosis did not receive oncological/surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combined approach was associated with improved yield and reduced time to evaluation/treatment, with similar success and adverse event rates. Careful multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to avoid performing unnecessary EUS procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":" ","pages":"e101-e106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sampling techniques for pancreaticobiliary malignancy have modest yields that could lead to delays in treatment. We evaluated whether combining EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with ERCP improved time to first outpatient evaluation and treatment.
Materials and methods: All patients without a prior pathological diagnosis who underwent index ERCP at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom, for malignant distal biliary obstruction from 2015 to 2020 were considered.
Results: A total of 292 patients were included, of whom 74.7% (n = 202) underwent EUS-TA/ERCP. A combined approach was more likely to establish a positive diagnosis (96.5% [n = 195] vs 57.8% [n = 52], P < 0.01) and less likely to require further sampling procedures (2.0% [n = 4] vs 17.8% [n = 16], P < 0.01). Mean times to first outpatient evaluation (16.9 vs 24.5 days [ P = 0.01]) and oncological treatment (55.1 vs 79.3 days [ P = 0.03]) were significantly shorter. A third (n = 86) of patients with a positive diagnosis did not receive oncological/surgical treatment.
Conclusions: A combined approach was associated with improved yield and reduced time to evaluation/treatment, with similar success and adverse event rates. Careful multidisciplinary discussion is recommended to avoid performing unnecessary EUS procedures.
期刊介绍:
Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.