Sacha K. G. Shaw, Jennifer L. Posey, Thomas Zane, Mary Jane Weiss
{"title":"Comparing interteaching and discussion forums in an asynchronous online classroom","authors":"Sacha K. G. Shaw, Jennifer L. Posey, Thomas Zane, Mary Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1002/jaba.2905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (<i>M</i> = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (<i>M</i> = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample <i>t</i> test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at <i>p</i> < .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (<i>M =</i> 87.28) and discussion forum (<i>M =</i> 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 4","pages":"989-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.2905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (M = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (M = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample t test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at p < .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (M = 87.28) and discussion forum (M = 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
本研究比较了在一门硕士水平的异步研究方法课程中，教学间活动和论坛活动对测验和作业成绩的影响。在交替处理设计中，六名参与者有一半周参与了教师间教学，另一半周参与了论坛讨论。参与互动教学的学员（M = 96.75）的测验分数普遍高于参与论坛讨论的学员（M = 75.95）。配对样本 t 检验的结果表明，两种条件下的学生在 p
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
