STudy to ActivelY WARM trauma patients (STAY WARM): a pilot study assessing feasibility of self-warming blankets in patients requiring a massive hemorrhage protocol activation.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Rachel Strauss, Amie Kron, Jeannie Callum, Chantal Armali, Dimpy Modi, Lowyl Notario, Pablo Perez D'Empaire, Bourke W Tillmann, Dylan Pannell, Homer Tien, Avery Nathens, Andrew Beckett, Luis Teodoro da Luz
{"title":"STudy to ActivelY WARM trauma patients (STAY WARM): a pilot study assessing feasibility of self-warming blankets in patients requiring a massive hemorrhage protocol activation.","authors":"Rachel Strauss, Amie Kron, Jeannie Callum, Chantal Armali, Dimpy Modi, Lowyl Notario, Pablo Perez D'Empaire, Bourke W Tillmann, Dylan Pannell, Homer Tien, Avery Nathens, Andrew Beckett, Luis Teodoro da Luz","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02612-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Massively bleeding trauma patients often arrive to intensive care units hypothermic. Active warming blankets have shown promise in reducing hypothermia in the pre-hospital setting, but less is known about their in-hospital use. The aim of this pilot evaluation was to understand the feasibility of the Ready-Heat<sup>®</sup> blanket in a level 1 trauma centre to improve the management of hypothermia in massively bleeding trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, feasibility study of 15 patients performed at a single level 1 trauma centre. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they presented to the trauma bay and a massive hemorrhage protocol was activated. Primary outcome measures (feasibility) included: blanket applied to the patient; temperature recording in the trauma bay, and next phase or final phase of care; and blanket remaining on patient upon arrival to the subsequent phase of care.Secondary outcome measures (safety) included skin irritation and cold discomfort. Use of the Ready-Heat<sup>®</sup> blanket was considered feasible if 10 of 15 patients met all four criteria for feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ready-Heat<sup>®</sup> blanket was placed on all patients with mean time to blanket application of 24 (± 13.4) minutes. Thirteen patients (86.7%) met all four criteria for feasibility. Initial challenges were identified in the first five patients including proper blanket application, keeping the blanket on the patient through subsequent phases of care, and failure to obtain temperature recordings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ready-Heat<sup>®</sup> blanket proves feasible for this patient population. A larger study focusing on hypothermia prevention and treatment is warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04399902.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>May 22, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02612-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Massively bleeding trauma patients often arrive to intensive care units hypothermic. Active warming blankets have shown promise in reducing hypothermia in the pre-hospital setting, but less is known about their in-hospital use. The aim of this pilot evaluation was to understand the feasibility of the Ready-Heat® blanket in a level 1 trauma centre to improve the management of hypothermia in massively bleeding trauma patients.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, feasibility study of 15 patients performed at a single level 1 trauma centre. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they presented to the trauma bay and a massive hemorrhage protocol was activated. Primary outcome measures (feasibility) included: blanket applied to the patient; temperature recording in the trauma bay, and next phase or final phase of care; and blanket remaining on patient upon arrival to the subsequent phase of care.Secondary outcome measures (safety) included skin irritation and cold discomfort. Use of the Ready-Heat® blanket was considered feasible if 10 of 15 patients met all four criteria for feasibility.

Results: The Ready-Heat® blanket was placed on all patients with mean time to blanket application of 24 (± 13.4) minutes. Thirteen patients (86.7%) met all four criteria for feasibility. Initial challenges were identified in the first five patients including proper blanket application, keeping the blanket on the patient through subsequent phases of care, and failure to obtain temperature recordings.

Conclusion: The Ready-Heat® blanket proves feasible for this patient population. A larger study focusing on hypothermia prevention and treatment is warranted.

Trial registration number: NCT04399902.

Date of registration: May 22, 2020.

积极温暖创伤患者的研究(STAY WARM):一项试点研究,评估需要启动大出血方案的患者使用自我温暖毯的可行性。
目的:大量出血的外伤患者到达重症监护室时往往体温过低。在院前环境中,主动式保暖毯已显示出降低低体温的前景,但人们对其在院内的使用却知之甚少。本次试点评估的目的是了解 Ready-Heat® 保暖毯在一级创伤中心改善大出血创伤患者低体温管理的可行性:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、可行性研究,在一家一级创伤中心对 15 名患者进行了研究。只要患者在创伤室就诊并启动了大出血方案,就有资格参加这项研究。主要结果测量指标(可行性)包括:给患者盖上毯子;在创伤室、下一阶段或最后护理阶段记录体温;患者到达下一阶段护理阶段时毯子仍盖在患者身上。如果 15 位患者中有 10 位符合所有四项可行性标准,则认为使用 Ready-Heat® 毯子是可行的:所有患者都使用了即热®毯,使用毯子的平均时间为 24 (± 13.4) 分钟。13名患者(86.7%)符合可行性的所有四项标准。在前五名患者中发现了最初的挑战,包括正确使用毯子、在随后的护理阶段保持毯子盖在患者身上以及无法获得体温记录:结论:事实证明,Ready-Heat®保温毯对这类患者是可行的。结论:事实证明,Ready-Heat® 毯子对这类患者是可行的,有必要进行更大规模的研究,重点关注低体温症的预防和治疗:试验注册号:NCT04399902.注册日期:2020 年 5 月 22 日:注册日期:2020 年 5 月 22 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信