Analysis of the intensity of engagement with CuidaTEXT, a text message intervention for dementia caregiver support among Latinos/as.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2024.2387111
Valerie Medina, Amber Watts, Monica Fracachán-Cabrera, Cameo Hazlewood, Mariana Ramirez-Mantilla, Eric D Vidoni, Jaime Perales-Puchalt
{"title":"Analysis of the intensity of engagement with <i>CuidaTEXT</i>, a text message intervention for dementia caregiver support among Latinos/as.","authors":"Valerie Medina, Amber Watts, Monica Fracachán-Cabrera, Cameo Hazlewood, Mariana Ramirez-Mantilla, Eric D Vidoni, Jaime Perales-Puchalt","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2024.2387111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the associations between participant intensity of engagement with a text message intervention, <i>CuidaTEXT</i>, and socio-demographic factors, acceptability measures, and clinical outcomes among Latino/a caregivers of individuals with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>CuidaTEXT</i> is a six-month, bilingual, and bidirectional intervention. We enrolled 24 Latino/a caregivers in a one-arm feasibility trial. Participants received approximately one automatic daily text message and could engage with the intervention by texting specific keywords (e.g. STRESS to receive messages about stress-coping), and by chat-texting with a live coach. We used metrics and psychometric scales to quantify variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants sent a total of 1847 messages to <i>CuidaTEXT</i>. Higher intensity of engagement was associated with higher intervention satisfaction (<i>r</i> = 0.6, <i>p</i> = 0.007), as were several other acceptability outcomes. We found no associations between intensity of engagement with <i>CuidaTEXT</i> and sociodemographic or clinical outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Encouraging more intense engagement with <i>CuidaTEXT</i> might lead to higher levels of satisfaction with the intervention. However, it is possible that those who are highly satisfied, engage more intensely with <i>CuidaTEXT</i>. Future research should determine the directionality of these associations to optimize text message interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Creating more opportunities to increase the intensity of text message engagement with caregiver support interventions may improve caregiver satisfaction with them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"924-945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2387111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the associations between participant intensity of engagement with a text message intervention, CuidaTEXT, and socio-demographic factors, acceptability measures, and clinical outcomes among Latino/a caregivers of individuals with dementia.

Methods: CuidaTEXT is a six-month, bilingual, and bidirectional intervention. We enrolled 24 Latino/a caregivers in a one-arm feasibility trial. Participants received approximately one automatic daily text message and could engage with the intervention by texting specific keywords (e.g. STRESS to receive messages about stress-coping), and by chat-texting with a live coach. We used metrics and psychometric scales to quantify variables.

Results: Participants sent a total of 1847 messages to CuidaTEXT. Higher intensity of engagement was associated with higher intervention satisfaction (r = 0.6, p = 0.007), as were several other acceptability outcomes. We found no associations between intensity of engagement with CuidaTEXT and sociodemographic or clinical outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Encouraging more intense engagement with CuidaTEXT might lead to higher levels of satisfaction with the intervention. However, it is possible that those who are highly satisfied, engage more intensely with CuidaTEXT. Future research should determine the directionality of these associations to optimize text message interventions.

Clinical implications: Creating more opportunities to increase the intensity of text message engagement with caregiver support interventions may improve caregiver satisfaction with them.

分析参与 CuidaTEXT(一种针对拉美裔痴呆症照护者支持的短信干预)的强度。
目的研究拉丁裔/拉美裔痴呆症患者照顾者参与短信干预CuidaTEXT的强度与社会人口因素、可接受性测量和临床结果之间的关联:CuidaTEXT 是一项为期六个月的双语双向干预措施。我们在一项单臂可行性试验中招募了 24 名拉丁裔照顾者。参与者每天会收到约一条自动短信,他们可以通过发送特定关键词(例如:STRESS,以接收有关压力应对的短信)和与真人教练聊天的方式参与干预。我们使用指标和心理测量量表来量化变量:结果:参与者共向 CuidaTEXT 发送了 1847 条信息。参与强度越高,干预满意度越高(r = 0.6,p = 0.007),其他几个可接受性结果也是如此。我们发现,参与 CuidaTEXT 的强度与社会人口学或临床结果之间没有关联(p > 0.05):结论:鼓励更多的人参与 CuidaTEXT 可能会提高干预的满意度。不过,也有可能是那些满意度高的人参与 CuidaTEXT 的程度更高。未来的研究应确定这些关联的方向性,以优化短信干预:临床意义:创造更多机会,提高护理人员参与短信支持干预的强度,可能会提高护理人员对干预的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信