Difference in medical student performance in a standardized patient encounter between telemedicine and in-person environments.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2024.2388422
Emily M Murphy, Ariella Stein, Reshma Pahwa, Maura McGuire, Tina Kumra
{"title":"Difference in medical student performance in a standardized patient encounter between telemedicine and in-person environments.","authors":"Emily M Murphy, Ariella Stein, Reshma Pahwa, Maura McGuire, Tina Kumra","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2388422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telemedicine is an increasingly common form of healthcare delivery in the United States. It is unclear how there are differences in clinical performance in early learners between in-person and telemedicine encounters.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>The authors conducted a single-site retrospective cohort study of 241 second-year medical students to compare performance between in-person and telemedicine standardized patient (SP) encounters. One hundred and twenty medical students in the 2020 academic year participated in a telemedicine encounter, and 121 medical students in the 2022 academic year participated in an in-person encounter. SPs completed a multi-domain performance checklist following the encounter, and the authors performed statistical analyses to compare student performance between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who completed in-person encounters had higher mean scores in overall performance (75.2 vs. 69.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001). They had higher scores in physical exam (83.3 vs. 50, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and interpersonal communication domains (95 vs. 85, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower scores in obtaining a history (73.3 vs. 80, <i>p</i> = 0.0025). There was no significant difference in assessment and plan scores (50 vs. 50, <i>p</i> = 0.96) or likelihood of appropriately promoting antibiotic stewardship (41.3% vs. 45.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors identified significant differences in clinical performance between in-person and telemedicine SP encounters, indicating that educational needs may differ between clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2388422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine is an increasingly common form of healthcare delivery in the United States. It is unclear how there are differences in clinical performance in early learners between in-person and telemedicine encounters.

Materials & methods: The authors conducted a single-site retrospective cohort study of 241 second-year medical students to compare performance between in-person and telemedicine standardized patient (SP) encounters. One hundred and twenty medical students in the 2020 academic year participated in a telemedicine encounter, and 121 medical students in the 2022 academic year participated in an in-person encounter. SPs completed a multi-domain performance checklist following the encounter, and the authors performed statistical analyses to compare student performance between groups.

Results: Students who completed in-person encounters had higher mean scores in overall performance (75.2 vs. 69.7, p < 0.001). They had higher scores in physical exam (83.3 vs. 50, p < 0.001) and interpersonal communication domains (95 vs. 85, p < 0.001) and lower scores in obtaining a history (73.3 vs. 80, p = 0.0025). There was no significant difference in assessment and plan scores (50 vs. 50, p = 0.96) or likelihood of appropriately promoting antibiotic stewardship (41.3% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.48).

Conclusion: The authors identified significant differences in clinical performance between in-person and telemedicine SP encounters, indicating that educational needs may differ between clinical environments.

远程医疗与面对面环境下医科学生在标准化会诊中的表现差异。
导言:在美国,远程医疗是一种越来越普遍的医疗服务形式。目前尚不清楚早期学习者的临床表现在面对面接触和远程医疗接触之间有何差异:作者对 241 名二年级医学生进行了一项单点回顾性队列研究,以比较面对面和远程医疗标准化病人 (SP) 会诊的表现。2020 学年的 120 名医学生参加了远程医疗会诊,2022 学年的 121 名医学生参加了面对面会诊。医学生在会诊后填写了一份多领域表现检查表,作者对两组学生的表现进行了统计分析比较:结果:完成面谈的学生在总体表现方面的平均得分更高(75.2 vs. 69.7,p p p = 0.0025)。评估和计划得分(50 分对 50 分,p = 0.96)或适当促进抗生素管理的可能性(41.3% 对 45.8%,p = 0.48)没有明显差异:作者发现,面对面和远程医疗 SP 会诊的临床表现存在明显差异,这表明不同临床环境下的教育需求可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信