The Influence of Instructional Constraints and Cognitive Control on the Positivity Bias and the Positivity Effect in Autobiographical Memory.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Karen L Siedlecki, Jillian Minahan Zucchetto, Neshat Yazdani
{"title":"The Influence of Instructional Constraints and Cognitive Control on the Positivity Bias and the Positivity Effect in Autobiographical Memory.","authors":"Karen L Siedlecki, Jillian Minahan Zucchetto, Neshat Yazdani","doi":"10.1177/00914150241268181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The positivity effect and the positivity bias were examined in voluntary and involuntary autobiographical memories in a sample of younger (<i>n </i>= 69, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub><i><sub> </sub></i>= 23.2) and older adults (<i>n </i>= 57, <i>M</i><sub>age </sub>= 67.72). The positivity effect has been shown to be sensitive to instructional constraints and cognitive resources. Instructions were manipulated in the voluntary autobiographical memory condition such that participants were instructed to retrieve memories with different levels of constraints. Participants also completed two measures of cognitive control and an assessment of future time perspective. There was no evidence of the positivity effect or positivity bias once depressive symptoms were included as a covariate in the analyses, nor did cognitive control influence memory valence. Future time perspective did not mediate the relationship between age and memory valence. These results suggest that additional research should focus on potential variables that may influence the positivity effect and bias within autobiographical memories.</p>","PeriodicalId":47878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"914150241268181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150241268181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The positivity effect and the positivity bias were examined in voluntary and involuntary autobiographical memories in a sample of younger (n = 69, Mage= 23.2) and older adults (n = 57, Mage = 67.72). The positivity effect has been shown to be sensitive to instructional constraints and cognitive resources. Instructions were manipulated in the voluntary autobiographical memory condition such that participants were instructed to retrieve memories with different levels of constraints. Participants also completed two measures of cognitive control and an assessment of future time perspective. There was no evidence of the positivity effect or positivity bias once depressive symptoms were included as a covariate in the analyses, nor did cognitive control influence memory valence. Future time perspective did not mediate the relationship between age and memory valence. These results suggest that additional research should focus on potential variables that may influence the positivity effect and bias within autobiographical memories.

教学限制和认知控制对自传体记忆中的积极性偏差和积极性效应的影响》(The Influence of Instructional Constraints and Cognitive Control on the Positivity Biasivity and Positivity Effect in Autobiographical Memory)。
研究人员以年轻人(n = 69,Mage = 23.2)和老年人(n = 57,Mage = 67.72)为样本,考察了自愿和非自愿自传体记忆中的积极效应和积极偏差。事实证明,积极效应对指令限制和认知资源很敏感。在自愿自传体记忆条件下,我们对指令进行了处理,让参与者在不同程度的限制条件下检索记忆。参与者还完成了两项认知控制测量和一项未来时间视角评估。将抑郁症状作为协变量纳入分析后,没有证据表明存在积极效应或积极偏差,认知控制也没有影响记忆价值。未来时间视角并没有调解年龄与记忆价值之间的关系。这些结果表明,更多的研究应该关注可能影响自传体记忆中积极效应和偏差的潜在变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: These are some of the broad questions with which the International Journal of Aging and Human Development is concerned. Emphasis is upon psychological and social studies of aging and the aged. However, the Journal also publishes research that introduces observations from other fields that illuminate the "human" side of gerontology, or utilizes gerontological observations to illuminate in other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信