[Application of small intestinal submucosa absorbable biofilm in the repair of alveolar bone defects].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Min-Zhen Zhang, Hui-Fang Kuang, Li-Yan Yang, Wen Luo
{"title":"[Application of small intestinal submucosa absorbable biofilm in the repair of alveolar bone defects].","authors":"Min-Zhen Zhang, Hui-Fang Kuang, Li-Yan Yang, Wen Luo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the clinical efficacy of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) absorbable biological membrane in alveolar bone defect repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 102 patients with alveolar bone defect who received guided bone regeneration (GBR) in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and divided into Bio-Gide group (51 cases using Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm) and SIS group (51 cases using SIS absorbable biofilm) by computer random number generator. The perioperative related indicators, blood calcium, blood phosphorus, biocompatibility, periodontal attachment loss (PAL) length, pulp sensitivity, tooth mobility, alveolar bone volume and adverse events of the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 24.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain on the first day after operation, VAS score on the fifth day after operation, wound healing time, blood calcium and phosphorus levels before operation, 1 d and 12 d after operation, PAL length before operation, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, pulp sensitivity and tooth looseness grade 1 and 2 percentage at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, bone width increase, bone height increase at 12 months after operation and adverse event rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with Bio-Gide group, the wound healing time and biofilm absorption time were shortened in SIS group(P<0.05), and the incidence of rejection was decreased 12 d after operation (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIS absorbable biofilm and Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm have similar efficacy and safety in repairing GBR for alveolar bone defects, but the former is more biocompatible and the latter can provide longer barrier function.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To study the clinical efficacy of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) absorbable biological membrane in alveolar bone defect repair.

Methods: A total of 102 patients with alveolar bone defect who received guided bone regeneration (GBR) in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and divided into Bio-Gide group (51 cases using Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm) and SIS group (51 cases using SIS absorbable biofilm) by computer random number generator. The perioperative related indicators, blood calcium, blood phosphorus, biocompatibility, periodontal attachment loss (PAL) length, pulp sensitivity, tooth mobility, alveolar bone volume and adverse events of the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 24.0 software package.

Results: There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain on the first day after operation, VAS score on the fifth day after operation, wound healing time, blood calcium and phosphorus levels before operation, 1 d and 12 d after operation, PAL length before operation, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, pulp sensitivity and tooth looseness grade 1 and 2 percentage at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, bone width increase, bone height increase at 12 months after operation and adverse event rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with Bio-Gide group, the wound healing time and biofilm absorption time were shortened in SIS group(P<0.05), and the incidence of rejection was decreased 12 d after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusions: SIS absorbable biofilm and Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm have similar efficacy and safety in repairing GBR for alveolar bone defects, but the former is more biocompatible and the latter can provide longer barrier function.

[小肠粘膜下可吸收生物膜在牙槽骨缺损修复中的应用]。
目的:研究小肠粘膜下可吸收生物膜在牙槽骨缺损修复中的临床疗效:选取2020年1月至2022年1月在我院接受引导骨再生术(GBR)的102例牙槽骨缺损患者,通过计算机随机数字生成器将其分为Bio-Gide组(51例使用Bio-Gide可吸收生物膜)和SIS组(51例使用SIS可吸收生物膜)。比较两组患者的围手术期相关指标、血钙、血磷、生物相容性、牙周附着丧失(PAL)长度、牙髓敏感性、牙齿活动度、牙槽骨量和不良反应。统计分析采用 SPSS 24.0 软件包:结果:两组在手术时间、术中失血量、术后第一天疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、术后第五天疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、伤口愈合时间、术前、术后 1 d 和 12 d 的血钙和血磷水平等方面均无明显差异、术前、术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的 PAL 长度,术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的牙髓敏感度和牙齿松动 1 级和 2 级百分比,术后 12 个月的骨宽度增加、骨高度增加以及两组间的不良事件发生率(P>0.05).与 Bio-Gide 组相比,SIS 组伤口愈合时间和生物膜吸收时间缩短(P<0.05),术后 12 d 排斥反应发生率降低(P<0.05):结论:SIS可吸收生物膜和Bio-Gide可吸收生物膜在修复牙槽骨缺损GBR方面具有相似的有效性和安全性,但前者的生物相容性更好,后者的屏障功能更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信