Safety and efficacy of lasers compared to cold knife in direct visual internal urethrotomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Muhammad Faizan, Eman Mahboob, Muhammad Ammar Samad, Leenah Fatima, Ammara Fatima, Amna Iqbal, Rafia Rauf, Mustafa Naeem, Umer Bin Shoaib, Sarush Ahmed Siddiqui, Muhammad Hasanain Imran
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of lasers compared to cold knife in direct visual internal urethrotomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Faizan, Eman Mahboob, Muhammad Ammar Samad, Leenah Fatima, Ammara Fatima, Amna Iqbal, Rafia Rauf, Mustafa Naeem, Umer Bin Shoaib, Sarush Ahmed Siddiqui, Muhammad Hasanain Imran","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04134-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cold knife urethrotome was introduced in 1971 and it had an 80% success rate. New advancements in this field have shed light on the use of various lasers such as carbon dioxide, Nd: YAG, KTP, Argon, Ho: YAG, and excimer lasers. It has been observed that cold knife urethrotomy has a higher recurrence rate than laser urethrotomy, but the superiority of either treatment modality has not been established yet. Data were thoroughly searched through PubMed, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. We also used clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing and published research. The data was analyzed via R studio version 2023.12.1 (oceanstorm). For dichotomous variables, Odds Ratio (OR) were used to pool data and standardized mean difference was used for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 14 studies including 1114 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the combined analysis revealed significant relation with a mean difference of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.37; 1.62), and favored laser group. The overall results have shown the laser to have a significant favorable profile demonstrating a recurrence, Odds Ratio of 0.42 (95% CI:0.27;0.65). Patients with laser therapy had a lower risk of complication rate (OR 0.49, 95% Cl: 0.35; 0.67). All the findings obtained by the analysis in this study favour lasers significantly over the cold knife technique especially when mean Qmax, with recurrence and complications taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04134-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold knife urethrotome was introduced in 1971 and it had an 80% success rate. New advancements in this field have shed light on the use of various lasers such as carbon dioxide, Nd: YAG, KTP, Argon, Ho: YAG, and excimer lasers. It has been observed that cold knife urethrotomy has a higher recurrence rate than laser urethrotomy, but the superiority of either treatment modality has not been established yet. Data were thoroughly searched through PubMed, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. We also used clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing and published research. The data was analyzed via R studio version 2023.12.1 (oceanstorm). For dichotomous variables, Odds Ratio (OR) were used to pool data and standardized mean difference was used for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 14 studies including 1114 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the combined analysis revealed significant relation with a mean difference of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.37; 1.62), and favored laser group. The overall results have shown the laser to have a significant favorable profile demonstrating a recurrence, Odds Ratio of 0.42 (95% CI:0.27;0.65). Patients with laser therapy had a lower risk of complication rate (OR 0.49, 95% Cl: 0.35; 0.67). All the findings obtained by the analysis in this study favour lasers significantly over the cold knife technique especially when mean Qmax, with recurrence and complications taken into account.

Abstract Image

激光与冷刀在直视下内尿道切开术中的安全性和有效性比较:系统回顾和 Meta 分析。
冷刀尿道切开术于 1971 年问世,成功率高达 80%。这一领域的新进展揭示了各种激光的使用,如二氧化碳激光、Nd:YAG 激光、KTP 激光、氩激光、Ho:YAG 激光和准分子激光。据观察,冷刀尿道切开术的复发率高于激光尿道切开术,但两种治疗方式的优劣尚未确定。我们通过PubMed、Scopus和clinicaltrials.gov对数据进行了全面搜索。我们还使用 clinicaltrials.gov 查询了正在进行和已发表的研究。数据通过 R studio version 2023.12.1 (oceanstorm) 进行分析。对于二分变量,使用比值比(OR)来汇集数据;对于连续变量,使用标准化平均差和 95% 置信区间(CI)。本次荟萃分析共纳入了 14 项研究,包括 1114 名参与者。综合分析的结果显示,激光组与其他组有显著关系,平均差为 0.99(95% CI:0.37;1.62)。总体结果显示,激光对复发有明显的有利影响,Odds Ratio 为 0.42 (95% CI:0.27; 0.65)。接受激光治疗的患者并发症风险较低(OR 0.49,95% Cl:0.35;0.67)。本研究分析得出的所有结果均显示,激光疗法明显优于冷刀疗法,尤其是在考虑到平均Qmax、复发率和并发症的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信