Knowledge, Acceptance, and Uptake of Family Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Ghana

3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Medicine
Ruth Zielinski, Samia Abdelnabi, Georgina Amankwah, Vida A. Kukula, Veronica Apetorgbor, Elizabeth Awini, John Williams, Cheryl Moyer, Bidisha Ghosh, Jody R. Lori
{"title":"Knowledge, Acceptance, and Uptake of Family Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Ghana","authors":"Ruth Zielinski, Samia Abdelnabi, Georgina Amankwah, Vida A. Kukula, Veronica Apetorgbor, Elizabeth Awini, John Williams, Cheryl Moyer, Bidisha Ghosh, Jody R. Lori","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21081025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of family planning (FP) methods significantly contributes to improved outcomes for mothers and their offspring. However, the use of FP remains low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. A cluster randomized controlled clinical trial was implemented in Ghana, comparing group antenatal care (ANC) with routine care. The group ANC intervention included eight meetings where the seventh group meeting incorporated information and discussion regarding methods of FP. Data collection occurred at five time points: baseline (T0), 34 weeks’ gestation (T1), 6–12 weeks post birth (T2), 5–8 months post birth, and 11–14 months post birth (T4). At T1, there was a significantly greater increase in the knowledge of FP methods as well as the intention to use FP after the birth among the intervention group. The uptake of FP was significantly higher in the intervention group for all post-birth timepoints except for T4 where the control group had significantly higher rates. The reasons for the diminishing effect are unclear. An increasing uptake of FP methods requires a multifaceted approach that includes increasing accessibility, knowledge, and acceptability as well as addressing societal and cultural norms.","PeriodicalId":14044,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of family planning (FP) methods significantly contributes to improved outcomes for mothers and their offspring. However, the use of FP remains low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. A cluster randomized controlled clinical trial was implemented in Ghana, comparing group antenatal care (ANC) with routine care. The group ANC intervention included eight meetings where the seventh group meeting incorporated information and discussion regarding methods of FP. Data collection occurred at five time points: baseline (T0), 34 weeks’ gestation (T1), 6–12 weeks post birth (T2), 5–8 months post birth, and 11–14 months post birth (T4). At T1, there was a significantly greater increase in the knowledge of FP methods as well as the intention to use FP after the birth among the intervention group. The uptake of FP was significantly higher in the intervention group for all post-birth timepoints except for T4 where the control group had significantly higher rates. The reasons for the diminishing effect are unclear. An increasing uptake of FP methods requires a multifaceted approach that includes increasing accessibility, knowledge, and acceptability as well as addressing societal and cultural norms.
计划生育的知识、接受度和采用率:加纳集体产前护理分组随机对照试验
使用计划生育(FP)方法大大有助于改善母亲及其后代的生活质量。然而,计划生育方法的使用率仍然很低,尤其是在中低收入国家。加纳实施了一项分组随机对照临床试验,对集体产前保健(ANC)和常规护理进行了比较。小组产前保健干预包括八次会议,其中第七次小组会议纳入了有关计划生育方法的信息和讨论。数据收集在五个时间点进行:基线(T0)、妊娠 34 周(T1)、产后 6-12 周(T2)、产后 5-8 个月和产后 11-14 个月(T4)。在 T1 阶段,干预组对 FP 方法的了解程度以及产后使用 FP 的意愿都有明显提高。除 T4 外,干预组在产后所有时间点的使用率都明显高于对照组,对照组的使用率明显高于干预组。效果下降的原因尚不清楚。要提高计划生育方法的使用率,需要采取多方面的方法,包括提高可获得性、知识性和可接受性,以及解决社会和文化规范问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信