Development of a novel electrochemical sensor for the detection of U6+ ion with polyaniline, N-phenylglycine and graphene oxide based electrode using 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-(diethylamino) phenol as ligand

IF 2.2 4区 化学 Q2 Engineering
Kusumita Dutta, Tessy Vincent, Siddhartha Panda
{"title":"Development of a novel electrochemical sensor for the detection of U6+ ion with polyaniline, N-phenylglycine and graphene oxide based electrode using 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-(diethylamino) phenol as ligand","authors":"Kusumita Dutta,&nbsp;Tessy Vincent,&nbsp;Siddhartha Panda","doi":"10.1007/s11696-024-03630-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Low limit of detection (LOD), high sensitivity and selectivity are essential performance criteria of a sensor. As the naturally occurring uranyl ion (U<sup>6+</sup>) is toxic, a sensor with suitable performance parameters for measuring U<sup>6+</sup> in drinking water is of interest. In this work, four aspects of the detection of U<sup>6+</sup> are presented. First, a composite synthesized from aniline, <i>N</i>-phenylglycine and graphene oxide (GO) was used for the first time to detect the uranyl ion. Second, the ligand 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-(diethylamino) phenol (BromoPADAP) was used as a ligand, attached at the composite surface, functionalized with diamine (Design I) and also as a complexing agent in the electrolyte (Design II), and a comparative study for both the cases was conducted. The parameters for comparison were the sensitivity, LOD and interference from several test ions. It was found that for Design I, the LOD was 50 ppt, while for Design II the LOD was 8 ppb. Next, the interference phenomena were explained by the conventional peak reduction (PR) technique and the barrier width (BW) technique. The BW technique was used for the first time to scale the interference of test ions toward the target analyte Cd<sup>2+</sup>, as in our previous works. PR technique requires a higher number of tests, while the BW technique employs a couple of tests, thus minimizing the effort. In this work, the BW technique supported the PR technique results in predicting the interference behavior. Finally, the BW technique was used to explain the difference in Design I and II results.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":513,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11696-024-03630-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low limit of detection (LOD), high sensitivity and selectivity are essential performance criteria of a sensor. As the naturally occurring uranyl ion (U6+) is toxic, a sensor with suitable performance parameters for measuring U6+ in drinking water is of interest. In this work, four aspects of the detection of U6+ are presented. First, a composite synthesized from aniline, N-phenylglycine and graphene oxide (GO) was used for the first time to detect the uranyl ion. Second, the ligand 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-(diethylamino) phenol (BromoPADAP) was used as a ligand, attached at the composite surface, functionalized with diamine (Design I) and also as a complexing agent in the electrolyte (Design II), and a comparative study for both the cases was conducted. The parameters for comparison were the sensitivity, LOD and interference from several test ions. It was found that for Design I, the LOD was 50 ppt, while for Design II the LOD was 8 ppb. Next, the interference phenomena were explained by the conventional peak reduction (PR) technique and the barrier width (BW) technique. The BW technique was used for the first time to scale the interference of test ions toward the target analyte Cd2+, as in our previous works. PR technique requires a higher number of tests, while the BW technique employs a couple of tests, thus minimizing the effort. In this work, the BW technique supported the PR technique results in predicting the interference behavior. Finally, the BW technique was used to explain the difference in Design I and II results.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

以 2-(5-溴-2-吡啶偶氮)-5-(二乙基氨基)苯酚为配体,利用聚苯胺、N-苯基甘氨酸和氧化石墨烯电极开发新型电化学传感器,用于检测 U6+ 离子
低检测限(LOD)、高灵敏度和高选择性是传感器的基本性能标准。由于天然存在的铀酰离子(U6+)具有毒性,因此具有合适性能参数的传感器对测量饮用水中的 U6+ 具有重要意义。本研究从四个方面介绍了 U6+ 的检测方法。首先,首次使用苯胺、N-苯基甘氨酸和氧化石墨烯(GO)合成的复合材料来检测铀酰离子。其次,使用配体 2-(5-溴-2-吡啶偶氮)-5-(二乙氨基)苯酚(BromoPADAP)作为配体,附着在复合材料表面,用二胺进行功能化(设计 I),同时也作为电解质中的络合剂(设计 II),并对这两种情况进行了比较研究。比较参数包括灵敏度、LOD 和几种测试离子的干扰。结果发现,设计 I 的检测限为 50 ppt,而设计 II 的检测限为 8 ppb。接下来,用传统的峰值降低(PR)技术和屏障宽度(BW)技术解释了干扰现象。与我们之前的工作一样,BW 技术首次用于测量测试离子对目标分析物 Cd2+ 的干扰。PR 技术需要较多的测试次数,而 BW 技术只需几次测试,因此可以最大限度地减少工作量。在这项工作中,BW 技术在预测干扰行为方面支持 PR 技术的结果。最后,BW 技术被用来解释设计 I 和设计 II 结果的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Papers
Chemical Papers Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
590
期刊介绍: Chemical Papers is a peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to basic and applied chemical research. It has a broad scope covering the chemical sciences, but favors interdisciplinary research and studies that bring chemistry together with other disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信