Immunity against conserved epitopes dominates after two consecutive exposures to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1

IF 7.5 1区 生物学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
{"title":"Immunity against conserved epitopes dominates after two consecutive exposures to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure histories become increasingly complex through original and variant-adapted vaccines and infections with viral variants. Upon exposure to the highly altered Omicron spike glycoprotein, pre-immunized individuals predominantly mount recall responses of Wuhan-Hu-1 (wild-type)-imprinted memory B (B<sub>MEM</sub>) cells mostly targeting conserved non-neutralizing epitopes, leading to diminished Omicron neutralization. We investigated the impact of imprinting in individuals double/triple vaccinated with a wild-type-strain-based mRNA vaccine who, thereafter, had two consecutive exposures to Omicron BA.1 spike (breakthrough infection followed by BA.1-adapted vaccine). We found that depletion of conserved epitope-recognizing antibodies using a wild-type spike bait results in strongly diminished BA.1 neutralization. Furthermore, spike-specific B<sub>MEM</sub> cells recognizing conserved epitopes are much more prevalent than BA.1-specific B<sub>MEM</sub> cells. Our observations suggest that imprinted B<sub>MEM</sub> cell recall responses limit the induction of strain-specific responses even after two consecutive BA.1 spike exposures. Vaccine adaptation strategies need to consider that prior SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccinations may cause persistent immune imprinting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9798,"journal":{"name":"Cell reports","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure histories become increasingly complex through original and variant-adapted vaccines and infections with viral variants. Upon exposure to the highly altered Omicron spike glycoprotein, pre-immunized individuals predominantly mount recall responses of Wuhan-Hu-1 (wild-type)-imprinted memory B (BMEM) cells mostly targeting conserved non-neutralizing epitopes, leading to diminished Omicron neutralization. We investigated the impact of imprinting in individuals double/triple vaccinated with a wild-type-strain-based mRNA vaccine who, thereafter, had two consecutive exposures to Omicron BA.1 spike (breakthrough infection followed by BA.1-adapted vaccine). We found that depletion of conserved epitope-recognizing antibodies using a wild-type spike bait results in strongly diminished BA.1 neutralization. Furthermore, spike-specific BMEM cells recognizing conserved epitopes are much more prevalent than BA.1-specific BMEM cells. Our observations suggest that imprinted BMEM cell recall responses limit the induction of strain-specific responses even after two consecutive BA.1 spike exposures. Vaccine adaptation strategies need to consider that prior SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccinations may cause persistent immune imprinting.

Abstract Image

连续两次接触 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 后,对保守表位的免疫力占主导地位
严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)接触史通过原始疫苗和变异适应疫苗以及病毒变异体感染变得越来越复杂。在暴露于高度改变的 Omicron 穗状糖蛋白时,预免疫个体主要对武汉-Hu-1(野生型)-印记记忆 B(BMEM)细胞产生回忆反应,这些细胞大多以保守的非中和表位为目标,从而导致 Omicron 中和作用减弱。我们研究了接种了基于野生型菌株的 mRNA 疫苗双联/三联的个体中印记的影响,这些个体在接种后连续两次暴露于 Omicron BA.1 穗状病毒(突破性感染后接种 BA.1 适应疫苗)。我们发现,使用野生型尖峰饵料消耗保守表位识别抗体会导致 BA.1 中和能力大大降低。此外,识别保守表位的尖峰特异性 BMEM 细胞比 BA.1 特异性 BMEM 细胞更普遍。我们的观察结果表明,即使连续暴露两次 BA.1 穗状病毒,印记 BMEM 细胞的召回反应也会限制诱导菌株特异性反应。疫苗适应策略需要考虑到之前的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗接种可能会导致持续的免疫印记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell reports
Cell reports CELL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
1305
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Cell Reports publishes high-quality research across the life sciences and focuses on new biological insight as its primary criterion for publication. The journal offers three primary article types: Reports, which are shorter single-point articles, research articles, which are longer and provide deeper mechanistic insights, and resources, which highlight significant technical advances or major informational datasets that contribute to biological advances. Reviews covering recent literature in emerging and active fields are also accepted. The Cell Reports Portfolio includes gold open-access journals that cover life, medical, and physical sciences, and its mission is to make cutting-edge research and methodologies available to a wide readership. The journal's professional in-house editors work closely with authors, reviewers, and the scientific advisory board, which consists of current and future leaders in their respective fields. The advisory board guides the scope, content, and quality of the journal, but editorial decisions are independently made by the in-house scientific editors of Cell Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信