A preliminary study exploring the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal excitability and phantom limb pain in people with a transtibial amputation.

Ashley N Dalrymple, Lee E Fisher, Douglas J Weber
{"title":"A preliminary study exploring the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal excitability and phantom limb pain in people with a transtibial amputation.","authors":"Ashley N Dalrymple, Lee E Fisher, Douglas J Weber","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad6a8d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is debilitating and affects over 70% of people with lower-limb amputation. Other neuropathic pain conditions correspond with increased spinal excitability, which can be measured using reflexes and<i>F</i>-waves. Spinal cord neuromodulation can be used to reduce neuropathic pain in a variety of conditions and may affect spinal excitability, but has not been extensively used for treating PLP. Here, we propose using a non-invasive neuromodulation method, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), to reduce PLP and modulate spinal excitability after transtibial amputation.<i>Approach</i>. We recruited three participants, two males (5- and 9-years post-amputation, traumatic and alcohol-induced neuropathy) and one female (3 months post-amputation, diabetic neuropathy) for this 5 d study. We measured pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), visual analog scale (VAS), and pain pressure threshold (PPT) test. We measured spinal reflex and motoneuron excitability using posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes and<i>F</i>-waves, respectively. We delivered tSCS for 30 min d<sup>-1</sup>for 5 d.<i>Main Results</i>. After 5 d of tSCS, MPQ scores decreased by clinically-meaningful amounts for all participants from 34.0 ± 7.0-18.3 ± 6.8; however, there were no clinically-significant decreases in VAS scores. Two participants had increased PPTs across the residual limb (Day 1: 5.4 ± 1.6 lbf; Day 5: 11.4 ± 1.0 lbf).<i>F</i>-waves had normal latencies but small amplitudes. PRM reflexes had high thresholds (59.5 ± 6.1<i>μ</i>C) and low amplitudes, suggesting that in PLP, the spinal cord is hypoexcitable. After 5 d of tSCS, reflex thresholds decreased significantly (38.6 ± 12.2<i>μ</i>C;<i>p</i>< 0.001).<i>Significance</i>. These preliminary results in this non-placebo-controlled study suggest that, overall, limb amputation and PLP may be associated with reduced spinal excitability and tSCS can increase spinal excitability and reduce PLP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad6a8d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is debilitating and affects over 70% of people with lower-limb amputation. Other neuropathic pain conditions correspond with increased spinal excitability, which can be measured using reflexes andF-waves. Spinal cord neuromodulation can be used to reduce neuropathic pain in a variety of conditions and may affect spinal excitability, but has not been extensively used for treating PLP. Here, we propose using a non-invasive neuromodulation method, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), to reduce PLP and modulate spinal excitability after transtibial amputation.Approach. We recruited three participants, two males (5- and 9-years post-amputation, traumatic and alcohol-induced neuropathy) and one female (3 months post-amputation, diabetic neuropathy) for this 5 d study. We measured pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), visual analog scale (VAS), and pain pressure threshold (PPT) test. We measured spinal reflex and motoneuron excitability using posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes andF-waves, respectively. We delivered tSCS for 30 min d-1for 5 d.Main Results. After 5 d of tSCS, MPQ scores decreased by clinically-meaningful amounts for all participants from 34.0 ± 7.0-18.3 ± 6.8; however, there were no clinically-significant decreases in VAS scores. Two participants had increased PPTs across the residual limb (Day 1: 5.4 ± 1.6 lbf; Day 5: 11.4 ± 1.0 lbf).F-waves had normal latencies but small amplitudes. PRM reflexes had high thresholds (59.5 ± 6.1μC) and low amplitudes, suggesting that in PLP, the spinal cord is hypoexcitable. After 5 d of tSCS, reflex thresholds decreased significantly (38.6 ± 12.2μC;p< 0.001).Significance. These preliminary results in this non-placebo-controlled study suggest that, overall, limb amputation and PLP may be associated with reduced spinal excitability and tSCS can increase spinal excitability and reduce PLP.

一项初步研究,探索经皮脊髓刺激对截肢者脊髓兴奋性和幻肢痛的影响。
目的:幻肢痛(PLP)会使人衰弱,影响 70% 以上的下肢截肢者。其他神经病理性疼痛症状与脊髓兴奋性增高相对应,脊髓兴奋性可通过反射和 F 波来测量。脊髓神经调控可用于减轻多种情况下的神经病理性疼痛,并可影响脊髓兴奋性,但尚未广泛用于治疗幻肢痛。在此,我们提议使用一种非侵入性神经调节方法--经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)来减轻幻肢痛,并调节经胫骨截肢后的脊髓兴奋性:我们招募了三名参与者,其中两名男性(截肢后 5 年和 9 年,外伤和酒精引起的神经病变)和一名女性(截肢后 3 个月,糖尿病神经病变)参加这项为期 5 天的研究。我们使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和疼痛压力阈值测试测量疼痛。我们使用后根肌(PRM)反射和 F 波分别测量脊髓反射和运动神经元的兴奋性。我们对患者进行了为期 5 天、每天 30 分钟的 tSCS 治疗:经过 5 天的 tSCS 治疗后,所有参与者的麦吉尔疼痛问卷评分均有临床意义的下降,从 34.0±7.0 降至 18.3±6.8;但 VAS 评分没有临床意义的下降。两名参与者的残肢疼痛压力阈值升高(第 1 天:5.4±1.6 磅;第 5 天:11.4±1.0 磅)。F 波的潜伏期正常,但振幅较小。PRM反射的阈值较高(59.5±6.1 µC),振幅较低,这表明PLP患者的脊髓兴奋性较低。在 tSCS 5 天后,反射阈值显著下降(38.6±12.2 µC;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信