Improving discharge summaries from hospital with a brief recommendation text box - results from a nationwide survey.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0046
Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard
{"title":"Improving discharge summaries from hospital with a brief recommendation text box - results from a nationwide survey.","authors":"Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Danish hospital physicians are obliged to mark the discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's GP is recommended to follow up, as well as to state suggested follow-up actions in a recommendation text box.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to investigate the GP's experiences with the recommendation text box.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A questionnaire sent to a representative sample of general practitioners in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with GPs and hospital physicians. It was subsequently pilot-tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost ¾ of the general practitioners (72%) 'totally or partly agree' that the recommendation text box is easy to find. In addition, our results show significant differences between software used by the GPs. Almost 2/3 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the recommendation text box provides brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs generally find that the recommendation text box provides them with brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up. In addition, the software used by the GPs has a significant influence on how the recommendation text box is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Danish hospital physicians are obliged to mark the discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's GP is recommended to follow up, as well as to state suggested follow-up actions in a recommendation text box.

Aim: This study aims to investigate the GP's experiences with the recommendation text box.

Design & setting: A questionnaire sent to a representative sample of general practitioners in Denmark.

Method: A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with GPs and hospital physicians. It was subsequently pilot-tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the survey.

Results: Almost ¾ of the general practitioners (72%) 'totally or partly agree' that the recommendation text box is easy to find. In addition, our results show significant differences between software used by the GPs. Almost 2/3 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the recommendation text box provides brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up.

Conclusion: GPs generally find that the recommendation text box provides them with brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up. In addition, the software used by the GPs has a significant influence on how the recommendation text box is presented.

用简短建议文本框改进出院摘要--全国性调查的结果。
背景:丹麦医院医生有义务在出院摘要中标注是否建议病人的全科医生进行随访,并在建议文本框中说明建议的随访行动:向丹麦具有代表性的全科医生样本发送问卷:根据背景材料、焦点小组访谈以及与全科医生和医院医生的讨论,为全科医生准备了一份问卷。随后,研究人员和全科医生对问卷进行了试点测试,并在调查前对问卷进行了修订:结果:近 3/3 的全科医生(72%)"完全或部分同意 "建议文本框易于查找。此外,我们的调查结果显示,全科医生使用的软件之间存在显著差异。近三分之二(63%)的全科医生 "完全同意 "或 "部分同意 "建议文本框提供有关建议随访的简短而准确的信息:结论:全科医生普遍认为,建议文本框为他们提供了简短而准确的建议随访信息。此外,全科医生使用的软件对建议文本框的显示方式也有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信