Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard
{"title":"Improving discharge summaries from hospital with a brief recommendation text box - results from a nationwide survey.","authors":"Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Danish hospital physicians are obliged to mark the discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's GP is recommended to follow up, as well as to state suggested follow-up actions in a recommendation text box.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to investigate the GP's experiences with the recommendation text box.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A questionnaire sent to a representative sample of general practitioners in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with GPs and hospital physicians. It was subsequently pilot-tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost ¾ of the general practitioners (72%) 'totally or partly agree' that the recommendation text box is easy to find. In addition, our results show significant differences between software used by the GPs. Almost 2/3 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the recommendation text box provides brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs generally find that the recommendation text box provides them with brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up. In addition, the software used by the GPs has a significant influence on how the recommendation text box is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Danish hospital physicians are obliged to mark the discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's GP is recommended to follow up, as well as to state suggested follow-up actions in a recommendation text box.
Aim: This study aims to investigate the GP's experiences with the recommendation text box.
Design & setting: A questionnaire sent to a representative sample of general practitioners in Denmark.
Method: A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with GPs and hospital physicians. It was subsequently pilot-tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the survey.
Results: Almost ¾ of the general practitioners (72%) 'totally or partly agree' that the recommendation text box is easy to find. In addition, our results show significant differences between software used by the GPs. Almost 2/3 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the recommendation text box provides brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up.
Conclusion: GPs generally find that the recommendation text box provides them with brief and precise information about the recommended follow-up. In addition, the software used by the GPs has a significant influence on how the recommendation text box is presented.