The outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Priscilla Princess Mhango, Thokozani Linda Zungu, Harold Ismael Nkume, Alinune Musopole, Shaffi Yusuf Mdala
{"title":"The outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.","authors":"Priscilla Princess Mhango, Thokozani Linda Zungu, Harold Ismael Nkume, Alinune Musopole, Shaffi Yusuf Mdala","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02607-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cataract is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness in Africa. The management of this condition requires timely surgical extraction of the cataractous lens with immediate optical correction and long-term follow-up to monitor visual improvement and manage complications that may arise. This review provides an opportunity to benchmark outcomes and to shed light on the reasons for those outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the published literature and report on the outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>The EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included all published primary studies from sub-Saharan Africa on cataract surgery outcomes in children aged 0-16 years with primary intraocular lens implantation conducted between 1990 and 2020. Eligible studies were those published in English or for which an English translation was available. In addition, reviewers screened the reference lists of all studies included in the full-text review for eligible studies. During the review, studies fitting the inclusion criteria above except for having been conducted in middle and high-income countries were tagged and placed in a comparison arm.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Study eligibility was determined by two independent reviewers, and data extraction was conducted by one reviewer with entries checked for accuracy by another reviewer. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data synthesis were followed. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used for quality appraisal of the studies. The statistical software R was used in the analysis, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Forest plots were generated using the R package 'metafor'.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery and the proportions of eyes that achieved good, borderline, or poor visual outcome according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) categorisation of post-operative visual acuity. The secondary outcome measures reported included lag time to surgery, rates of follow-up, and rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight out of 4763 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, and seven were included in the quantitative analysis. There was a male preponderance in the study population, and the mean age at the time of cataract surgery ranged from 3.4 to 8.4 years. Visual outcomes were available for short-term visual outcomes (1 to 6 months) as the studies had a significant loss to follow-up. The pooled proportion of eyes that achieved a good visual acuity (i.e. equal to or greater than 6/18) in the short-term period was 31% (CI, 20-42). The comparative studies from middle and high-income countries reported proportions ranging from 41 to 91%, with higher thresholds for good visual acuity of 6/12 and 6/15.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This review reports that there is a lower proportion of eyes with good outcomes after undergoing paediatric cataract surgery in sub-Saharan Africa than in middle- and high-income countries. Furthermore, this review states that there is a high proportion of patients lost to follow-up and suboptimal refractive correction and amblyopia treatment after paediatric cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02607-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cataract is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness in Africa. The management of this condition requires timely surgical extraction of the cataractous lens with immediate optical correction and long-term follow-up to monitor visual improvement and manage complications that may arise. This review provides an opportunity to benchmark outcomes and to shed light on the reasons for those outcomes.

Objectives: To review the published literature and report on the outcomes of paediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens insertion in sub-Saharan Africa.

Data source: The EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles.

Study selection: We included all published primary studies from sub-Saharan Africa on cataract surgery outcomes in children aged 0-16 years with primary intraocular lens implantation conducted between 1990 and 2020. Eligible studies were those published in English or for which an English translation was available. In addition, reviewers screened the reference lists of all studies included in the full-text review for eligible studies. During the review, studies fitting the inclusion criteria above except for having been conducted in middle and high-income countries were tagged and placed in a comparison arm.

Data extraction and synthesis: Study eligibility was determined by two independent reviewers, and data extraction was conducted by one reviewer with entries checked for accuracy by another reviewer. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data synthesis were followed. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used for quality appraisal of the studies. The statistical software R was used in the analysis, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Forest plots were generated using the R package 'metafor'.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery and the proportions of eyes that achieved good, borderline, or poor visual outcome according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) categorisation of post-operative visual acuity. The secondary outcome measures reported included lag time to surgery, rates of follow-up, and rate of complications.

Results: Eight out of 4763 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, and seven were included in the quantitative analysis. There was a male preponderance in the study population, and the mean age at the time of cataract surgery ranged from 3.4 to 8.4 years. Visual outcomes were available for short-term visual outcomes (1 to 6 months) as the studies had a significant loss to follow-up. The pooled proportion of eyes that achieved a good visual acuity (i.e. equal to or greater than 6/18) in the short-term period was 31% (CI, 20-42). The comparative studies from middle and high-income countries reported proportions ranging from 41 to 91%, with higher thresholds for good visual acuity of 6/12 and 6/15.

Conclusion and relevance: This review reports that there is a lower proportion of eyes with good outcomes after undergoing paediatric cataract surgery in sub-Saharan Africa than in middle- and high-income countries. Furthermore, this review states that there is a high proportion of patients lost to follow-up and suboptimal refractive correction and amblyopia treatment after paediatric cataract surgery.

撒哈拉以南非洲地区小儿白内障手术与眼内人工晶体植入术的结果:系统性综述。
重要性:白内障是非洲儿童失明的主要原因之一。治疗这种疾病需要及时通过手术摘除白内障晶状体,并立即进行光学矫正和长期随访,以监测视力改善情况和处理可能出现的并发症。本综述提供了一个基准结果的机会,并阐明产生这些结果的原因:回顾已发表的文献,报告撒哈拉以南非洲地区儿童白内障手术及眼内人工晶体植入术的结果:数据来源:在 EMBASE、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上搜索相关文章:我们纳入了撒哈拉以南非洲地区在 1990 年至 2020 年间发表的所有关于 0-16 岁儿童白内障手术治疗效果和初次眼内人工晶体植入术的主要研究。符合条件的研究均以英文发表或有英文译本。此外,审稿人还筛选了所有纳入全文综述的研究的参考文献列表,以查找符合条件的研究。在审查过程中,除了在中等收入和高收入国家进行的研究外,符合上述纳入标准的研究均被标记并列入对比研究:研究资格由两名独立审稿人确定,数据提取由一名审稿人进行,并由另一名审稿人检查条目的准确性。数据综合遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)的批判性评估核对表用于对研究进行质量评估。分析中使用了 R 统计软件,并使用随机效应模型对数据进行了汇总。使用R软件包 "metafor "生成森林图:主要结果是白内障手术后的视力(VA),以及根据世界卫生组织(WHO)对术后视力的分类,达到良好、边缘或较差视力结果的眼睛比例。报告的次要结果指标包括手术滞后时间、随访率和并发症发生率:在 4763 项研究中,有 8 项符合纳入本综述的条件,其中 7 项纳入了定量分析。研究人群中男性居多,白内障手术时的平均年龄从 3.4 岁到 8.4 岁不等。由于这些研究的随访损失较大,因此只能获得短期(1 至 6 个月)的视觉结果。短期内达到良好视力(即等于或大于 6/18)的眼睛的总比例为 31% (CI,20-42)。来自中等收入和高收入国家的比较研究报告的比例从41%到91%不等,视力良好的阈值较高,分别为6/12和6/15:本综述报告指出,撒哈拉以南非洲地区接受儿童白内障手术后获得良好疗效的眼睛比例低于中等收入和高收入国家。此外,本综述还指出,儿童白内障手术后失去随访的患者比例较高,屈光矫正和弱视治疗效果不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信