Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for severe agitation in real-world emergency settings: protocol of individual-participant-data network meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Spyridon Siafis, Hui Wu, Nobuyuki Nomura, Johannes Schneider-Thoma, Irene Bighelli, Carolin Lorenz, Joseph E Dib, Prathap Tharyan, Leonie A Calver, Geoffrey K Isbister, Esther W Y Chan, Jonathan C Knott, Celene Y L Yap, Célia Mantovani, Marc L Martel, David Barbic, William G Honer, Wulf-Peter Hansen, Gisele Huf, Jacob Alexander, Nirmal S Raveendran, Evandro S F Coutinho, Josef Priller, Clive E Adams, Georgia Salanti, Stefan Leucht
{"title":"Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for severe agitation in real-world emergency settings: protocol of individual-participant-data network meta-analysis.","authors":"Spyridon Siafis, Hui Wu, Nobuyuki Nomura, Johannes Schneider-Thoma, Irene Bighelli, Carolin Lorenz, Joseph E Dib, Prathap Tharyan, Leonie A Calver, Geoffrey K Isbister, Esther W Y Chan, Jonathan C Knott, Celene Y L Yap, Célia Mantovani, Marc L Martel, David Barbic, William G Honer, Wulf-Peter Hansen, Gisele Huf, Jacob Alexander, Nirmal S Raveendran, Evandro S F Coutinho, Josef Priller, Clive E Adams, Georgia Salanti, Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02623-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe psychomotor agitation and aggression often require immediate pharmacological intervention, but clear evidence-based recommendations for choosing among the multiple options are lacking. To address this gap, we plan a systematic review and individual-participant-data network meta-analysis to investigate their comparative effectiveness in real-world emergency settings with increased precision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will include randomized controlled trials investigating intramuscular or intravenous pharmacological interventions, as monotherapy or in combination, in adults with severe psychomotor agitation irrespective of the underlying diagnosis and requiring rapid tranquilization in general or psychiatric emergency settings. We will exclude studies before 2002, those focusing on specific reasons for agitation and placebo-controlled trials to avoid concerns related to the transitivity assumption and potential selection biases. We will search for eligible studies in BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP. Individual-participant data will be requested from the study authors and harmonized into a uniform format, and aggregated data will also be extracted from the studies. At least two independent reviewers will conduct the study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment using RoB 2, and applicability evaluation using the RITES tool. The primary outcome will be the number of patients achieving adequate sedation within 30 min after treatment, with secondary outcomes including the need for additional interventions and adverse events, using odds ratios as the effect size. If enough individual-participant data will be collected, we will synthesize them in a network meta-regression model within a Bayesian framework, incorporating study- and participant-level characteristics to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. In cases where individual-participant data are unavailable, potential data availability bias will be explored, and models allowing for the inclusion of studies reporting only aggregated data will be considered. We will assess the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This individual-participant-data network meta-analysis aims to provide a fine-tuned synthesis of the evidence on the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for severe psychomotor agitation in real-world emergency settings. The findings from this study can greatly be provided clearer evidence-based guidance on the most effective treatments.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023402365.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02623-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe psychomotor agitation and aggression often require immediate pharmacological intervention, but clear evidence-based recommendations for choosing among the multiple options are lacking. To address this gap, we plan a systematic review and individual-participant-data network meta-analysis to investigate their comparative effectiveness in real-world emergency settings with increased precision.

Methods: We will include randomized controlled trials investigating intramuscular or intravenous pharmacological interventions, as monotherapy or in combination, in adults with severe psychomotor agitation irrespective of the underlying diagnosis and requiring rapid tranquilization in general or psychiatric emergency settings. We will exclude studies before 2002, those focusing on specific reasons for agitation and placebo-controlled trials to avoid concerns related to the transitivity assumption and potential selection biases. We will search for eligible studies in BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP. Individual-participant data will be requested from the study authors and harmonized into a uniform format, and aggregated data will also be extracted from the studies. At least two independent reviewers will conduct the study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment using RoB 2, and applicability evaluation using the RITES tool. The primary outcome will be the number of patients achieving adequate sedation within 30 min after treatment, with secondary outcomes including the need for additional interventions and adverse events, using odds ratios as the effect size. If enough individual-participant data will be collected, we will synthesize them in a network meta-regression model within a Bayesian framework, incorporating study- and participant-level characteristics to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. In cases where individual-participant data are unavailable, potential data availability bias will be explored, and models allowing for the inclusion of studies reporting only aggregated data will be considered. We will assess the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach.

Discussion: This individual-participant-data network meta-analysis aims to provide a fine-tuned synthesis of the evidence on the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for severe psychomotor agitation in real-world emergency settings. The findings from this study can greatly be provided clearer evidence-based guidance on the most effective treatments.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023402365.

真实世界急救环境中严重躁动的药物治疗效果:个人参与者数据网络荟萃分析协议。
背景:严重的精神运动性躁动和攻击行为往往需要立即进行药物干预,但在多种方案中如何做出选择却缺乏明确的循证建议。为了填补这一空白,我们计划进行一项系统性综述和个人参与者数据网络荟萃分析,以更精确地研究它们在真实世界急救环境中的比较效果:我们将纳入研究肌肉注射或静脉注射药物干预的随机对照试验,这些试验针对的是在普通或精神科急诊环境中需要快速镇静的严重精神运动性躁动成人患者,无论其基础诊断如何,均可作为单一疗法或联合疗法使用。我们将排除 2002 年之前的研究、针对特定躁动原因的研究以及安慰剂对照试验,以避免与过渡性假设和潜在选择偏差有关的问题。我们将在 BIOSIS、CENTRAL、CINAHL Plus、Embase、LILACS、MEDLINE via Ovid、PubMed、ProQuest、PsycINFO、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 WHO-ICTRP 中搜索符合条件的研究。将要求研究作者提供参与者的个人数据,并将其统一为统一格式,还将从研究中提取汇总数据。至少有两名独立评审员将进行研究选择、数据提取、使用 RoB 2 进行偏倚风险评估以及使用 RITES 工具进行适用性评估。主要结果是治疗后 30 分钟内达到充分镇静的患者人数,次要结果包括是否需要额外干预和不良事件,使用几率比作为效应大小。如果能收集到足够多的个体参与者数据,我们将在贝叶斯框架内通过网络元回归模型对这些数据进行综合,同时纳入研究和参与者层面的特征,以探索潜在的异质性来源。在无法获得个体参与者数据的情况下,我们将探讨潜在的数据可用性偏差,并考虑纳入仅报告汇总数据的研究模型。我们将采用网络Meta分析置信度(CINeMA)方法评估证据的置信度:本项个人参与者数据网络荟萃分析旨在对现实世界急救环境中药物干预治疗严重精神运动性躁动的比较有效性证据进行微调综合。这项研究的结果可为最有效的治疗方法提供更明确的循证指导:系统综述注册:PREMCORD42023402365。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信