New equation for estimation of dental age by tooth cementum thickness in adolescents and adults: forensic aspects.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1007/s00414-024-03297-x
Minja Birimiša, Jelena Dumančić, Marin Vodanović, Sandra Anić-Milošević, Hrvoje Brkić
{"title":"New equation for estimation of dental age by tooth cementum thickness in adolescents and adults: forensic aspects.","authors":"Minja Birimiša, Jelena Dumančić, Marin Vodanović, Sandra Anić-Milošević, Hrvoje Brkić","doi":"10.1007/s00414-024-03297-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our research was aimed to establish the equation and to determine its precision for dental age estimation in adolescents, adults and the elderly based on the thickness of deposited dental cement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study sample consisted of 206 donor teeth of both sexes (10 to 82 years of age). The roots were transversely cut (6 cuts) on an ISOMET 1000 cutter at apical, middle, and cervical parts (slice thickness 0.3 to 0.5 μm). Measurements of cement thickness on incisions were made with a light microscope and an Olympus EP50 camera with previous microscope calibration for each measurement episode. Measurements were carried out clockwise at 4 measuring points on each incision. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software packages STATISTICA version 12.0 StatSoft, Inc. 2013, and MedCalc<sup>®</sup> version 22.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean cement thickness (MCT) significantly declined from apical to cervical cuts (P < 0.001, ANOVA) and was thicker in teeth with a destroyed tooth crown (P < 0.001, ANOVA) and in molars compared to incisors (P < 0.001, ANOVA). MCT was greater in men and in teeth with more than one root but without reaching statistical significance. MCT showed a significant increase from the second decade of chronological age with a peek at sixth decade and declined to the ninth decade (P < 0.001, ANOVA). Piecewise linear regression defined a breakpoint age of 53 years, so two different equations were calculated (≤ 53 years and > 53 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resulting equation is recommended for estimating dental age in forensic analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2459-2467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03297-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our research was aimed to establish the equation and to determine its precision for dental age estimation in adolescents, adults and the elderly based on the thickness of deposited dental cement.

Design: The study sample consisted of 206 donor teeth of both sexes (10 to 82 years of age). The roots were transversely cut (6 cuts) on an ISOMET 1000 cutter at apical, middle, and cervical parts (slice thickness 0.3 to 0.5 μm). Measurements of cement thickness on incisions were made with a light microscope and an Olympus EP50 camera with previous microscope calibration for each measurement episode. Measurements were carried out clockwise at 4 measuring points on each incision. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software packages STATISTICA version 12.0 StatSoft, Inc. 2013, and MedCalc® version 22.0.

Results: Mean cement thickness (MCT) significantly declined from apical to cervical cuts (P < 0.001, ANOVA) and was thicker in teeth with a destroyed tooth crown (P < 0.001, ANOVA) and in molars compared to incisors (P < 0.001, ANOVA). MCT was greater in men and in teeth with more than one root but without reaching statistical significance. MCT showed a significant increase from the second decade of chronological age with a peek at sixth decade and declined to the ninth decade (P < 0.001, ANOVA). Piecewise linear regression defined a breakpoint age of 53 years, so two different equations were calculated (≤ 53 years and > 53 years).

Conclusions: The resulting equation is recommended for estimating dental age in forensic analyses.

Abstract Image

根据青少年和成年人牙骨质厚度估算牙龄的新公式:法医学方面。
目的:我们的研究旨在根据沉积牙水泥的厚度,建立青少年、成年人和老年人的牙齿年龄估计公式并确定其精确度:我们的研究旨在根据沉积牙水泥的厚度,为青少年、成年人和老年人的牙齿年龄估算建立方程并确定其精确度:研究样本包括 206 颗供体牙,男女均有(10 至 82 岁)。在 ISOMET 1000 型切割机上对牙根的根尖、中部和颈部进行横向切割(6 刀)(切片厚度为 0.3 至 0.5 μm)。使用光学显微镜和奥林巴斯EP50照相机测量切口上的骨水泥厚度,每次测量之前都要进行显微镜校准。顺时针在每个切口的 4 个测量点进行测量。使用统计软件包 STATISTICA 12.0 StatSoft, Inc. 2013 和 MedCalc® 22.0 版本进行统计分析:平均骨水泥厚度(MCT)从根尖切口到颈部切口明显下降(P 53岁):结论:建议在法医分析中使用所得出的等式来估计牙齿年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信