A window of opportunity for ICU end-of-life care-A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1111/aas.14507
Iben Strøm Darfelt, Anne Højager Nielsen, Pål Klepstad, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard
{"title":"A window of opportunity for ICU end-of-life care-A retrospective multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Iben Strøm Darfelt, Anne Højager Nielsen, Pål Klepstad, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.14507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"window of opportunity\" for intensive care staff to deliver end-of-life (EOL) care lies in the timeframe from \"documenting the diagnosis of dying\" to death. Diagnosing the dying can be a challenging task in the ICU. We aimed to describe the trajectories for dying patients in Danish intensive care units (ICUs) and to examine whether physicians document that patients are dying in time to perform EOL care and, if so, when a window of opportunity for EOL care exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Danish Intensive Care Database, we identified patients ≥18 years old admitted to Danish ICUs between January and December 2020 with an ICU stay of >96 h (four days) and who died during the ICU stay or within 7 days after ICU discharge. A chart review was performed on 250 consecutive patients admitted from January 1, 2020, to ICUs in the Central Denmark Region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most charts (223 [89%]), it was documented that the patient was dying. Of those patients who received mechanical ventilation, 171 (68%) died after abrupt discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, and 63 (25%) died after gradual withdrawal. Patients whose mechanical ventilation was discontinued abruptly died after a median of 1 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-15) and 5 h (IQR: 2-15) after a diagnosis of dying was recorded. In contrast, patients with a gradual withdrawal died after a median of 108 h (IQR: 71-189) and 22 h (IQR: 5-67) after a diagnosis of dying was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EOL care hinges on the ability to diagnose the dying. This study shows that there is a window of opportunity for EOL care, particularly for patients who are weaned from mechanical ventilation. This highlights the importance of intensifying efforts to address EOL care requirements for ICU patients and those discharged from ICUs who are not eligible for readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1446-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The "window of opportunity" for intensive care staff to deliver end-of-life (EOL) care lies in the timeframe from "documenting the diagnosis of dying" to death. Diagnosing the dying can be a challenging task in the ICU. We aimed to describe the trajectories for dying patients in Danish intensive care units (ICUs) and to examine whether physicians document that patients are dying in time to perform EOL care and, if so, when a window of opportunity for EOL care exists.

Methods: From the Danish Intensive Care Database, we identified patients ≥18 years old admitted to Danish ICUs between January and December 2020 with an ICU stay of >96 h (four days) and who died during the ICU stay or within 7 days after ICU discharge. A chart review was performed on 250 consecutive patients admitted from January 1, 2020, to ICUs in the Central Denmark Region.

Results: In most charts (223 [89%]), it was documented that the patient was dying. Of those patients who received mechanical ventilation, 171 (68%) died after abrupt discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, and 63 (25%) died after gradual withdrawal. Patients whose mechanical ventilation was discontinued abruptly died after a median of 1 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-15) and 5 h (IQR: 2-15) after a diagnosis of dying was recorded. In contrast, patients with a gradual withdrawal died after a median of 108 h (IQR: 71-189) and 22 h (IQR: 5-67) after a diagnosis of dying was recorded.

Conclusions: EOL care hinges on the ability to diagnose the dying. This study shows that there is a window of opportunity for EOL care, particularly for patients who are weaned from mechanical ventilation. This highlights the importance of intensifying efforts to address EOL care requirements for ICU patients and those discharged from ICUs who are not eligible for readmission.

ICU 生命末期护理的机会之窗--一项多中心队列回顾性研究。
背景:重症监护人员提供生命末期(EOL)护理的 "机会之窗 "就在从 "记录濒死诊断 "到死亡的这段时间内。在重症监护病房,诊断临终病人是一项具有挑战性的任务。我们旨在描述丹麦重症监护病房(ICU)中临终患者的生命轨迹,并研究医生是否及时记录患者濒临死亡以实施临终关怀,如果是,何时存在临终关怀的机会之窗:我们从丹麦重症监护数据库中找出了 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间入住丹麦重症监护病房、在重症监护病房住院时间超过 96 小时(4 天)且在重症监护病房住院期间或出院后 7 天内死亡的年龄≥18 岁的患者。我们对丹麦中部地区自2020年1月1日起入住重症监护室的250名连续患者进行了病历审查:大多数病历(223 份[89%])都记录了患者濒临死亡。在接受机械通气的患者中,171 人(68%)在突然停止机械通气后死亡,63 人(25%)在逐渐停止机械通气后死亡。突然中断机械通气的患者分别在诊断为死亡后 1 小时(四分位间距 [IQR]:0-15)和 5 小时(四分位间距 [IQR]:2-15)后死亡。与此相反,逐渐停药的患者分别在确诊死亡后 108 小时(IQR:71-189)和 22 小时(IQR:5-67)后死亡:临终关怀取决于诊断临终的能力。本研究表明,临终关怀存在机会之窗,尤其是对已脱离机械通气的患者。这凸显了加大力度满足重症监护病房患者和从重症监护病房出院但不符合再次入院条件的患者的临终关怀要求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信