A retrospective study on the efficacy of pegfilgrastim-filgrastim combination regimen in the mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients.

Xingtong Wang, Wei Guo, Junna Li, Jia Li, Yangzhi Zhao, Beibei Du, Ou Bai
{"title":"A retrospective study on the efficacy of pegfilgrastim-filgrastim combination regimen in the mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients.","authors":"Xingtong Wang, Wei Guo, Junna Li, Jia Li, Yangzhi Zhao, Beibei Du, Ou Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.07.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high mobilization failure rate with the mobilization strategy of combining chemotherapy and filgrastim (rhG-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in lymphomas is one of the unresolved issues. Whether the combination of polyethylene glycol filgrastim [pegfilgrastim (PEG-FIL), PEG-rhG-CSF] and filgrastim (FIL) improves the mobilization success rate and the timing of combination therapy has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>107 lymphoma patients who received auto-HSCT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into groups of PEG+FIL and FIL. The group of PEG+FIL received pegfilgrastim (9 mg) on the third day of the chemotherapy, followed by filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day) based on the counts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). The group of FIL received filgrastim 10 μg /kg/day depending on the number of PBSCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of neutropenic fever in the group of PEG+FIL was significantly lower than in the group of FIL. The mean recovery time of leukocytes at autologous stem cell transplantation was significantly shorter in the group of PEG+FIL than in the group of FIL. Compared to the groups of FIL, the group of PEG+FIL had lower hospitalization costs. We found that the combination therapy is more recommended for patients with a bone marrow hematopoietic area of less than 30 %. Filgrastim is best administered 5-6 days after pegfilgrastim administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to conventional filgrastim mobilization, the combination of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim schedule has high efficacy, non-inferior safety, and superior health economic benefits during auto-HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2024.07.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The high mobilization failure rate with the mobilization strategy of combining chemotherapy and filgrastim (rhG-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in lymphomas is one of the unresolved issues. Whether the combination of polyethylene glycol filgrastim [pegfilgrastim (PEG-FIL), PEG-rhG-CSF] and filgrastim (FIL) improves the mobilization success rate and the timing of combination therapy has not been studied.

Methods: 107 lymphoma patients who received auto-HSCT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into groups of PEG+FIL and FIL. The group of PEG+FIL received pegfilgrastim (9 mg) on the third day of the chemotherapy, followed by filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day) based on the counts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). The group of FIL received filgrastim 10 μg /kg/day depending on the number of PBSCs.

Results: The incidence of neutropenic fever in the group of PEG+FIL was significantly lower than in the group of FIL. The mean recovery time of leukocytes at autologous stem cell transplantation was significantly shorter in the group of PEG+FIL than in the group of FIL. Compared to the groups of FIL, the group of PEG+FIL had lower hospitalization costs. We found that the combination therapy is more recommended for patients with a bone marrow hematopoietic area of less than 30 %. Filgrastim is best administered 5-6 days after pegfilgrastim administration.

Conclusions: Compared to conventional filgrastim mobilization, the combination of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim schedule has high efficacy, non-inferior safety, and superior health economic benefits during auto-HSCT.

一项关于pegfilgrastim-filgrastim联合疗法对淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植动员疗效的回顾性研究。
背景:在淋巴瘤的自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)中,化疗与filgrastim(rhG-CSF)联合应用的动员策略的动员失败率很高,这是一个尚未解决的问题。聚乙二醇非格司亭[pegfilgrastim (PEG-FIL),PEG-rhG-CSF]和非格司亭[filgrastim (FIL)]联合治疗是否能提高动员成功率以及联合治疗的时机尚未研究。PEG+FIL 组在化疗的第三天接受 pegfilgrastim(9 毫克),然后根据外周血干细胞(PBSC)的计数接受 filgrastim(10 微克/公斤/天)。FIL组根据外周血干细胞的数量接受10微克/千克/天的非格司亭治疗:结果:PEG+FIL 组的中性粒细胞减少性发热发生率明显低于 FIL 组。PEG+FIL组自体干细胞移植时白细胞的平均恢复时间明显短于FIL组。与 FIL 组相比,PEG+FIL 组的住院费用更低。我们发现,骨髓造血面积小于 30% 的患者更推荐使用联合疗法。Filgrastim 最好在使用 pegfilgrastim 5-6 天后再使用:结论:与传统的非格司亭动员疗法相比,培格非格司亭和非格司亭联合疗法在自身造血干细胞移植过程中具有较高的疗效、非劣质的安全性和较好的医疗经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信