EXPRESS: Getting the Board on Board: Marketing Department Power and Board Interlocks

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Peter Ebbes, Frank Germann, Rajdeep Grewal
{"title":"EXPRESS: Getting the Board on Board: Marketing Department Power and Board Interlocks","authors":"Peter Ebbes, Frank Germann, Rajdeep Grewal","doi":"10.1177/00222437241272180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the power held by the marketing department can determine key organizational outcomes, including firm performance, this power seemingly has been decreasing. To address this apparent disconnect, the authors propose that the board of directors is a critical but overlooked antecedent of marketing department power (MDP). In particular, the authors demonstrate that directors’ exposure through board service at other firms (i.e., board interlocks) affects MDP in the firms on whose boards they also serve (i.e., focal firms). A sample of 6,008 firms, spanning 2007–2021, reveals that MDP in board-interlocked firms has a positive effect on MDP in focal firms. Despite evidence that board interlock effects have diminished or even disappeared, the findings suggest the board interlock effect remains a potent antecedent of MDP—and this effect did not decrease during the observation period. Adapting the 3R (reach–richness–receptivity) framework, the authors also find that the board interlock effect increases with greater reach and richness of a focal firm’s board interlock network and its executives’ receptivity to information. The marketing department’s decreasing power is concerning for the discipline; the robust results of this study suggest that firms need to get the board “on board” to stem this diminishing trend.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437241272180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the power held by the marketing department can determine key organizational outcomes, including firm performance, this power seemingly has been decreasing. To address this apparent disconnect, the authors propose that the board of directors is a critical but overlooked antecedent of marketing department power (MDP). In particular, the authors demonstrate that directors’ exposure through board service at other firms (i.e., board interlocks) affects MDP in the firms on whose boards they also serve (i.e., focal firms). A sample of 6,008 firms, spanning 2007–2021, reveals that MDP in board-interlocked firms has a positive effect on MDP in focal firms. Despite evidence that board interlock effects have diminished or even disappeared, the findings suggest the board interlock effect remains a potent antecedent of MDP—and this effect did not decrease during the observation period. Adapting the 3R (reach–richness–receptivity) framework, the authors also find that the board interlock effect increases with greater reach and richness of a focal firm’s board interlock network and its executives’ receptivity to information. The marketing department’s decreasing power is concerning for the discipline; the robust results of this study suggest that firms need to get the board “on board” to stem this diminishing trend.
快讯让董事会参与进来:市场部权力与董事会互锁
尽管市场营销部门的权力可以决定包括公司业绩在内的关键组织结果,但这种权力似乎一直在下降。为了解决这一明显的脱节问题,作者提出,董事会是营销部门权力(MDP)的一个重要但被忽视的前因。作者特别证明,董事通过在其他公司的董事会任职(即董事会互锁),会影响他们同时在其董事会任职的公司(即焦点公司)的营销部门权力。对 2007-2021 年间 6 008 家公司的抽样调查显示,董事会互锁公司的 MDP 对焦点公司的 MDP 有积极影响。尽管有证据表明董事会互锁效应已经减弱甚至消失,但研究结果表明,董事会互锁效应仍然是 MDP 的有力前因,而且这种效应在观察期内并没有减弱。通过调整 3R(覆盖面-丰富度-接受度)框架,作者还发现,董事会连锁效应会随着焦点公司董事会连锁网络的覆盖面和丰富度以及高管对信息的接受度的增加而增加。市场营销部门的力量不断减弱,这对这门学科来说令人担忧;本研究的有力结果表明,企业需要让董事会 "加入",以阻止这种减弱的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信