Key stakeholders and their roles in modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure: a systematic literature review

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Eric McLaren, Dimitrios Salampasis, Richard Busulwa, Rico Johannes Baldegger, Pascal Wild
{"title":"Key stakeholders and their roles in modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure: a systematic literature review","authors":"Eric McLaren, Dimitrios Salampasis, Richard Busulwa, Rico Johannes Baldegger, Pascal Wild","doi":"10.1108/sampj-08-2023-0598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Even though extant research highlights the crucial role some stakeholders play in helping corporations understand, manage and mitigate the occurrence of modern slavery in their supply chains and operations, there is a fundamental lack of understanding of all the relevant stakeholder groups and the specific roles they play. By adopting a stakeholder theory approach, this study aims to identify all the key stakeholders and their associated roles towards supporting corporations’ modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A systematic literature review was conducted by following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant literature included scholarly work focusing on the identification of key stakeholders and the roles they play in enabling corporations’ modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Nine stakeholder groups and their roles were identified, such as governments, workers, IGOs, NGOs and suppliers. Examples of performed activities include conducting audits, providing training, monitoring occurrences of modern slavery, enforcing regulations, reporting on labour issues and evaluating corporations’ modern slavery reports.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>A comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders and their roles enables better collaboration towards achieving transparency within corporations’ supply chains and operations. Other stakeholders can leverage these findings to enhance modern slavery reporting activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Clarity regarding key stakeholders and their roles may improve quality and quantity of reported modern slavery information, enhancing corporations’ public accountability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study adopts a stakeholder theory approach to provide a comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders and their roles in enhancing corporations’ modern slavery reporting activities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-08-2023-0598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Even though extant research highlights the crucial role some stakeholders play in helping corporations understand, manage and mitigate the occurrence of modern slavery in their supply chains and operations, there is a fundamental lack of understanding of all the relevant stakeholder groups and the specific roles they play. By adopting a stakeholder theory approach, this study aims to identify all the key stakeholders and their associated roles towards supporting corporations’ modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure activities.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic literature review was conducted by following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant literature included scholarly work focusing on the identification of key stakeholders and the roles they play in enabling corporations’ modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure activities.

Findings

Nine stakeholder groups and their roles were identified, such as governments, workers, IGOs, NGOs and suppliers. Examples of performed activities include conducting audits, providing training, monitoring occurrences of modern slavery, enforcing regulations, reporting on labour issues and evaluating corporations’ modern slavery reports.

Practical implications

A comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders and their roles enables better collaboration towards achieving transparency within corporations’ supply chains and operations. Other stakeholders can leverage these findings to enhance modern slavery reporting activities.

Social implications

Clarity regarding key stakeholders and their roles may improve quality and quantity of reported modern slavery information, enhancing corporations’ public accountability.

Originality/value

This study adopts a stakeholder theory approach to provide a comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders and their roles in enhancing corporations’ modern slavery reporting activities.

主要利益攸关方及其在现代奴隶制监测、侦查和披露中的作用:系统文献综述
目的尽管现有研究强调了一些利益攸关方在帮助企业了解、管理和减少其供应链和运营中发生的现代奴隶制现象方面所发挥的关键作用,但对所有相关利益攸关方群体及其所发挥的具体作用仍然缺乏根本性的了解。通过采用利益相关者理论方法,本研究旨在确定所有主要利益相关者及其在支持公司的现代奴隶制监测、侦查和披露活动方面的相关作用。相关文献包括侧重于识别主要利益相关者及其在促进公司开展现代奴隶制监测、侦查和披露活动中的作用的学术著作。研究结果识别出九个利益相关者群体及其作用,如政府、工人、政府间组织、非政府组织和供应商。对主要利益相关者及其作用的全面了解有助于更好地开展合作,以实现企业供应链和运营的透明度。其他利益相关者可以利用这些发现来加强现代奴隶制报告活动。社会意义明确主要利益相关者及其作用可以提高报告现代奴隶制信息的质量和数量,加强企业的公众责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信