Bioeconomic and sustainability performance of dairy-beef steer and heifer production systems differing in stocking rate

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M. Kearney , E.G. O'Riordan , M. McGee , J. Breen , R. Dunne , P. French , P. Crosson
{"title":"Bioeconomic and sustainability performance of dairy-beef steer and heifer production systems differing in stocking rate","authors":"M. Kearney ,&nbsp;E.G. O'Riordan ,&nbsp;M. McGee ,&nbsp;J. Breen ,&nbsp;R. Dunne ,&nbsp;P. French ,&nbsp;P. Crosson","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is little published research on dairy-beef heifer systems or comparisons of heifer and steer dairy-beef production. Furthermore, given its impact on the productivity and economics of dairy-beef systems, any comparison of gender must also consider potential interactions with stocking rate (SR). The objective of this study was to evaluate the variability of physical and economic performance, greenhouse gas emissions, feed-food competition and pasture land-use of dairy-beef production steer and heifer systems at differing stocking rates. Performance data from a two (gender: Steers and Heifers) x two (SR: Low and High) x two (breed-types: Early-maturing (EM) and Late-maturing (LM) factorial experiment was used to parameterize a bio-economic farm systems model. Low SR animals were heavier, had higher fat scores and better conformed at slaughter. High stocking rate resulted in greater carcass output per hectare and subsequently were, on average, 22 % more profitable than their Low SR counterparts. Late-maturing animals were found to be more profitable than early-maturing, and steers were more profitable than heifers. GHG emissions of the eight treatments investigated ranged from 10.7 to 17.7 kgs of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq) per kilogram of carcass weight produced, with both High SR and heifer systems having lower GHG emissions per kg of product than their Low SR and steer counterparts. Human edible protein efficiency was only favorable for the steer systems. High SR systems had, on average, lower land use per kg of product than their Low SR counterparts. Results from this study indicate that no single treatment was optimal across the range of performance metrics considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 105531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001379/pdfft?md5=b812e493600bfee0b3c671aeffd9c74d&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little published research on dairy-beef heifer systems or comparisons of heifer and steer dairy-beef production. Furthermore, given its impact on the productivity and economics of dairy-beef systems, any comparison of gender must also consider potential interactions with stocking rate (SR). The objective of this study was to evaluate the variability of physical and economic performance, greenhouse gas emissions, feed-food competition and pasture land-use of dairy-beef production steer and heifer systems at differing stocking rates. Performance data from a two (gender: Steers and Heifers) x two (SR: Low and High) x two (breed-types: Early-maturing (EM) and Late-maturing (LM) factorial experiment was used to parameterize a bio-economic farm systems model. Low SR animals were heavier, had higher fat scores and better conformed at slaughter. High stocking rate resulted in greater carcass output per hectare and subsequently were, on average, 22 % more profitable than their Low SR counterparts. Late-maturing animals were found to be more profitable than early-maturing, and steers were more profitable than heifers. GHG emissions of the eight treatments investigated ranged from 10.7 to 17.7 kgs of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2eq) per kilogram of carcass weight produced, with both High SR and heifer systems having lower GHG emissions per kg of product than their Low SR and steer counterparts. Human edible protein efficiency was only favorable for the steer systems. High SR systems had, on average, lower land use per kg of product than their Low SR counterparts. Results from this study indicate that no single treatment was optimal across the range of performance metrics considered.

饲养率不同的奶牛-小公牛和小母牛生产系统的生物经济和可持续性绩效
有关奶牛-肉牛小母牛系统或小母牛与公牛奶牛-肉牛生产比较的公开研究很少。此外,考虑到性别对奶牛-牛肉系统的生产率和经济性的影响,任何性别比较都必须考虑到与存栏率(SR)的潜在相互作用。本研究的目的是评估不同放养率下奶牛-牛肉生产公牛和母牛系统的物理和经济性能、温室气体排放、饲料-食物竞争和牧场土地利用的变化。来自两个(性别:母牛和小母牛)x 两个(SR:低和高)x 两个(品种类型:早熟(EM))系统的性能数据:早熟(EM)和晚熟(LM))因子实验的性能数据被用于对生物经济农场系统模型进行参数化。低SR牲畜体重更大,脂肪分数更高,屠宰时体型更好。高放养率使每公顷胴体产量更高,因此平均利润比低SR动物高出22%。晚熟牲畜比早熟牲畜更有利可图,公牛比母牛更有利可图。在所调查的八种处理中,每公斤胴体重量的温室气体排放量在 10.7 至 17.7 公斤二氧化碳当量(kg COeq)之间,高 SR 和小母牛系统每公斤产品的温室气体排放量均低于低 SR 和小公牛系统。人类可食用蛋白质效率仅对公牛饲养系统有利。高SR系统每公斤产品的平均土地使用量低于低SR系统。这项研究的结果表明,在所考虑的一系列性能指标中,没有一种处理方法是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信