Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew J Hall, Rachael Cullinan, Glory Alozie, Swati Chopra, Leanne Greig, Jon Clarke, Philip E Riches, Phil Walmsley, Nicholas E Ohly, Nicholas Holloway
{"title":"Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.","authors":"Andrew J Hall, Rachael Cullinan, Glory Alozie, Swati Chopra, Leanne Greig, Jon Clarke, Philip E Riches, Phil Walmsley, Nicholas E Ohly, Nicholas Holloway","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2023-1371.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in implant survival according to sex, age, or obesity status. Ten-year PROMs were available for 196/387 (50.6%) surviving patients and were excellent: mean Oxford Knee Score 34.4 (95% CI 32.7 to 36.1); mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 51.2 (95% CI 16.1 to 86.3); mean EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire score 69.9 (95% CI 46.8 to 93.0); 141/196 (71.9%) achieved the 22-point FJS patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS); and 156/196 (79.6%) were \"very satisfied or satisfied\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the only large study reporting ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of TKA using a cemented single-radius design and with a CS tibial bearing construct. The findings of excellent implant survival, safety, and functional outcomes indicate that this combination is a safe and effective option in routine TKA. Further investigation of this single-radius design TKA with CS tibial bearings with well-matched patient study groups will allow further insight into the performance of these implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 8","pages":"808-816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2023-1371.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m2 (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in implant survival according to sex, age, or obesity status. Ten-year PROMs were available for 196/387 (50.6%) surviving patients and were excellent: mean Oxford Knee Score 34.4 (95% CI 32.7 to 36.1); mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 51.2 (95% CI 16.1 to 86.3); mean EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire score 69.9 (95% CI 46.8 to 93.0); 141/196 (71.9%) achieved the 22-point FJS patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS); and 156/196 (79.6%) were "very satisfied or satisfied".

Conclusion: This is the only large study reporting ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of TKA using a cemented single-radius design and with a CS tibial bearing construct. The findings of excellent implant survival, safety, and functional outcomes indicate that this combination is a safe and effective option in routine TKA. Further investigation of this single-radius design TKA with CS tibial bearings with well-matched patient study groups will allow further insight into the performance of these implants.

在不牺牲后十字韧带的情况下,采用骨水泥单半径髁稳定设计进行全膝关节置换术。
目的:与十字韧带固定(CR)设计相比,高度同形髁稳定(CS)关节的全膝关节置换术(TKA)可能具有更高的稳定性,同时减轻了后方稳定结构的局限性。该研究旨在评估在不牺牲后交叉韧带的情况下,使用 CS 嵌体的骨水泥单桡骨 TKA 的十年植入存活率和功能结果:这项回顾性队列研究包括2010年11月至2012年12月期间在英国一家专科中心接受TKA手术的连续患者。数据通过定制的电子数据库收集,并与全国关节成形术审计数据进行交叉对比,变量包括:术前特征、术中因素、并发症和死亡率状况。患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)由专业研究小组在术后十年收集。共有 536 例 TKAs,其中 308/536 例(57.5%)为女性患者。平均年龄为 69.0 岁(95% CI 45.0 至 88.0),平均体重指数为 32.2 kg/m2(95% CI 18.9 至 50.2),387/536(72.2%)例患者存活十年。共有四次翻修(0.7%):两次深部感染(需要清创并保留种植体),一次无菌性松动,一次血丝沉着:Kaplan-Meier分析表明,植入物的存活率与性别、年龄或肥胖状况无关。196/387(50.6%)名存活患者的十年PROM均为优秀:平均牛津膝关节评分为34.4(95% CI为32.7至36.1);平均忘却关节评分(FJS)为51.2(95% CI为16.1至86.3);平均EuroQol五项评分为34.4(95% CI为32.7至36.1);平均FJS评分为51.2(95% CI为16.1至86.3)。3);EuroQol 五维度五级问卷平均得分 69.9(95% CI 46.8 至 93.0);141/196(71.9%)人达到了 FJS 患者可接受症状状态(PASS)22 分;156/196(79.6%)人 "非常满意或满意":这是唯一一项报道采用骨水泥单桡骨设计和CS胫骨支座结构的TKA十年植入存活率和功能结果的大型研究。出色的植入物存活率、安全性和功能性结果表明,在常规 TKA 中,这种组合是一种安全有效的选择。在匹配良好的患者研究小组中对这种单桡骨设计 TKA 和 CS 胫骨轴承进行进一步研究,将有助于进一步了解这些植入物的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信