The Clinical Utility of Powdered and Flowable Matrices in Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Allegra L Fierro, Nour Hijazi, Carolyn Foley, Lauren Rodio, John C Lantis
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of Powdered and Flowable Matrices in Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration.","authors":"Allegra L Fierro, Nour Hijazi, Carolyn Foley, Lauren Rodio, John C Lantis","doi":"10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cellular and matrix-like products come in many forms. Among them, powdered and micronized formulations have become increasingly available and popular owing to their unique properties and advantages. Powders have increased tissue contact which many believe can enhance granulation tissue formation, they fill irregular and deep cavities, and they can be used in concert with sheet-like products and skin grafts for improved healing. Despite their advantages, powdered products do have certain limitations that hinder their use, including poor insurance coverage and a lack of CPT coding for adequate reimbursement in an outpatient setting, making their use primarily limited to the operating room. Also, most published data on powdered products consists of smaller case studies and case series, with few reports evaluating the efficacy and utility of powdered formulations compared to their sheet-like progenitors. In this manuscript, we organize available powdered matrix products by type of substrate: xenograft, allograft, placental-based, and synthetic, and review the data in support of various products in specific wound types. This review of the supporting literature provides the current body of evidence on the utility of powdered matrices in wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cellular and matrix-like products come in many forms. Among them, powdered and micronized formulations have become increasingly available and popular owing to their unique properties and advantages. Powders have increased tissue contact which many believe can enhance granulation tissue formation, they fill irregular and deep cavities, and they can be used in concert with sheet-like products and skin grafts for improved healing. Despite their advantages, powdered products do have certain limitations that hinder their use, including poor insurance coverage and a lack of CPT coding for adequate reimbursement in an outpatient setting, making their use primarily limited to the operating room. Also, most published data on powdered products consists of smaller case studies and case series, with few reports evaluating the efficacy and utility of powdered formulations compared to their sheet-like progenitors. In this manuscript, we organize available powdered matrix products by type of substrate: xenograft, allograft, placental-based, and synthetic, and review the data in support of various products in specific wound types. This review of the supporting literature provides the current body of evidence on the utility of powdered matrices in wounds.

粉末和可流动基质在伤口修复和组织再生中的临床应用
细胞和类基质产品有多种形式。其中,粉末状和微粉化制剂因其独特的性能和优势,越来越多地受到人们的青睐。粉末可增加与组织的接触,许多人认为这可促进肉芽组织的形成,粉末可填充不规则的深腔,还可与片状产品和植皮产品配合使用,以改善愈合。尽管粉末产品有很多优点,但它们也有一些局限性,阻碍了它们的使用,包括保险覆盖率低,缺乏 CPT 编码,无法在门诊环境中获得足够的报销,因此它们的使用主要局限于手术室。此外,已发表的有关粉末产品的数据大多是小型病例研究和系列病例,很少有报告评估粉末制剂与其片状制剂相比的疗效和实用性。在本手稿中,我们按基质类型对现有的粉末基质产品进行了整理:异种基质、同种基质、胎盘基质和合成基质,并回顾了各种产品在特定伤口类型中的支持数据。这篇文献综述提供了目前有关粉末基质在伤口中应用的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信