Mitigating multiples, less is more: examining trends in multifetal gestation rates with assisted reproductive technology.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Hanna Kim, Andrew J Claffey, Kevin J Doody, Kathleen M Doody
{"title":"Mitigating multiples, less is more: examining trends in multifetal gestation rates with assisted reproductive technology.","authors":"Hanna Kim, Andrew J Claffey, Kevin J Doody, Kathleen M Doody","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03208-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multifetal gestation (MFG) is much more common in pregnancies that utilize assisted reproductive technologies (ART). We assessed how these rates have changed over the previous decade and the impact on live birth rates (LBR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study uses the National Summary Reports of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) from 2014 to 2020. Data points included only autologous cycles. The data were divided into five age groups as reported in the database: < 35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and > 42 years old. Descriptive statistics and a two-tailed T-test were used to determine the trends and statistical significance (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of twin births decreased substantially from 2014 to 2020 for autologous embryo transfers across all age groups and diagnoses. Surprisingly, the overall LBR for autologous IVF cycles decreased at similar rates from 2014 to 2020 in all age groups. The mean number of embryos transferred has dramatically reduced, especially across age groups < 42.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of twin and higher-level gestations have decreased substantially over the past decade; the effect correlates with the increased utilization of eSET and PGT. The cause of infertility did not significantly impact the rate of MFG.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03208-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Multifetal gestation (MFG) is much more common in pregnancies that utilize assisted reproductive technologies (ART). We assessed how these rates have changed over the previous decade and the impact on live birth rates (LBR).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study uses the National Summary Reports of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) from 2014 to 2020. Data points included only autologous cycles. The data were divided into five age groups as reported in the database: < 35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and > 42 years old. Descriptive statistics and a two-tailed T-test were used to determine the trends and statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Results: Rates of twin births decreased substantially from 2014 to 2020 for autologous embryo transfers across all age groups and diagnoses. Surprisingly, the overall LBR for autologous IVF cycles decreased at similar rates from 2014 to 2020 in all age groups. The mean number of embryos transferred has dramatically reduced, especially across age groups < 42.

Conclusion: Rates of twin and higher-level gestations have decreased substantially over the past decade; the effect correlates with the increased utilization of eSET and PGT. The cause of infertility did not significantly impact the rate of MFG.

Abstract Image

减少多胎妊娠,少即是多:研究辅助生殖技术多胎妊娠率的趋势。
目的:多胎妊娠(MFG)在使用辅助生殖技术(ART)的妊娠中更为常见。我们评估了这些比率在过去十年中的变化情况以及对活产率(LBR)的影响:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2014 年至 2020 年辅助生殖技术协会(SART)的国家总结报告。数据点仅包括自体周期。数据被分为数据库中报告的五个年龄组:42岁。采用描述性统计和双尾 T 检验来确定趋势和统计显著性(P 结果:从 2014 年到 2020 年,所有年龄组和诊断的自体胚胎移植的双胎率都大幅下降。令人惊讶的是,从 2014 年到 2020 年,所有年龄组的自体试管婴儿周期的总体 LBR 下降率相似。胚胎移植的平均数量大幅减少,尤其是在各年龄组中:在过去十年中,双胎和高妊娠率大幅下降;这种影响与eSET和PGT使用率的增加有关。不孕原因对多胎妊娠率的影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信