Joint ICOH-WOPS & APA-PFAW global roundtable perspectives: exploring national policy approaches for psychological health at work through the 'National Policy Index' lens.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rachael E Potter, Michael Ertel, Maureen Dollard, Stavroula Leka, Aditya Jain, Loic Lerouge, Irene Houtman, Birgit Aust, Won-Jun Choi, Nicholas Crooks, John Fitzgerald, Siti Nurani Hassan, Andrea Kirk-Brown, Takenori Mishiba, Ashley Spetch, Ulrich Stoetzer, Pieter VAN Dijk
{"title":"Joint ICOH-WOPS & APA-PFAW global roundtable perspectives: exploring national policy approaches for psychological health at work through the 'National Policy Index' lens.","authors":"Rachael E Potter, Michael Ertel, Maureen Dollard, Stavroula Leka, Aditya Jain, Loic Lerouge, Irene Houtman, Birgit Aust, Won-Jun Choi, Nicholas Crooks, John Fitzgerald, Siti Nurani Hassan, Andrea Kirk-Brown, Takenori Mishiba, Ashley Spetch, Ulrich Stoetzer, Pieter VAN Dijk","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2024-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worker psychological health is a significant global imperative which requires national policy action and stakeholder engagement. While national policy is a critical lever for improving worker psychological health, some countries are more progressive than others in relation to policy development and/or implementation. At the Joint Congress of the International Commission on Occupational Health, Scientific Committee on Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors and the Asia Pacific Academy for Psychosocial Factors Work in Tokyo (September 2023), a Global Roundtable was designed to initiate international dialogue and knowledge exchange regarding relevant national policy approaches. The Global Roundtable involved experts from diverse regions alongside an engaged audience of congress attendees and facilitators. Qualitative data were analysed against the five components of the National Policy Index tool, comprising policy priority, specific laws, nation-wide initiatives, sector-oriented initiatives, national survey and/or studies. Analysis revealed that while work-related psychological health is a policy priority across many countries, at the same time, there are global gaps in both legislation specificity and active regulation across different countries. For future policy development across countries, it will be beneficial to continue and deepen international discourse and for countries to share their approaches with others.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2024-0092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worker psychological health is a significant global imperative which requires national policy action and stakeholder engagement. While national policy is a critical lever for improving worker psychological health, some countries are more progressive than others in relation to policy development and/or implementation. At the Joint Congress of the International Commission on Occupational Health, Scientific Committee on Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors and the Asia Pacific Academy for Psychosocial Factors Work in Tokyo (September 2023), a Global Roundtable was designed to initiate international dialogue and knowledge exchange regarding relevant national policy approaches. The Global Roundtable involved experts from diverse regions alongside an engaged audience of congress attendees and facilitators. Qualitative data were analysed against the five components of the National Policy Index tool, comprising policy priority, specific laws, nation-wide initiatives, sector-oriented initiatives, national survey and/or studies. Analysis revealed that while work-related psychological health is a policy priority across many countries, at the same time, there are global gaps in both legislation specificity and active regulation across different countries. For future policy development across countries, it will be beneficial to continue and deepen international discourse and for countries to share their approaches with others.

ICOH-WOPS 和 APA-PFAW 联合举办的全球圆桌会议观点:从 "国家政策指数 "的角度探讨工作场所心理健康的国家政策方法。
工人心理健康是一项重要的全球性任务,需要国家政策行动和利益相关者的参与。虽然国家政策是改善工人心理健康的关键杠杆,但一些国家在政策制定和/或实施方面比其他国家更先进。在东京举行的国际职业健康委员会、工作组织与社会心理因素科学委员会和亚太社会心理因素工作研究院联合大会(2023 年 9 月)上,设计了一个全球圆桌会议,以启动有关国家政策方法的国际对话和知识交流。参加全球圆桌会议的有来自不同地区的专家以及大会与会者和主持人。定性数据根据国家政策指数工具的五个组成部分进行了分析,包括政策优先事项、具体法律、全国性倡议、面向部门的倡议、国家调查和/或研究。分析表明,虽然与工作有关的心理健康在许多国家都是政策优先事项,但与此同时,不同国家在具体立法和积极监管方面都存在全球性差距。为了各国未来的政策发展,继续并深化国际讨论以及各国与其他国家分享其方法将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信