Determination of the best point of entry of percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws depending on patient positioning for surgery: A cadaveric study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Michał Kułakowski, Karol Elster, Wojciech Piotrowski, Paweł Ślęczka, Aleksandra Królikowska, Jarosław Witkowski, Łukasz Oleksy, Dariusz Janczak, Paweł Reichert
{"title":"Determination of the best point of entry of percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws depending on patient positioning for surgery: A cadaveric study.","authors":"Michał Kułakowski, Karol Elster, Wojciech Piotrowski, Paweł Ślęczka, Aleksandra Królikowska, Jarosław Witkowski, Łukasz Oleksy, Dariusz Janczak, Paweł Reichert","doi":"10.17219/acem/188780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard starting point for percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion was initially determined at the intersection of the line posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine and the line continuing the anatomical axis of the femur. The technique was pioneered in patients lying prone in surgery, although it has been used with patients in the supine position. The optimal starting point for patients in both prone and supine positions remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This cadaveric study aimed to determine the best entry point for the percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws depending on the patient's positioning for surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Kirschner wires (K-wires) were percutaneously inserted into the sacral body of 8th human cadavers. In addition to the so-called standard sacroiliac screw entry point (point A), points located consecutively 1 cm (point B) and 2 cm (point C) cranially from the point along the line, prolonging the femoral axis were also studied. The K-wires were inserted into the studied entry points on the right side in a supine position and on the left side of the same cadaver in a prone position. The placement of the K-wires was assessed using radiographic imaging and cadaver dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An analysis of the K-wire placement in the supine position revealed incorrect positioning of 100% of the K-wires inserted at entry point A and 87% at entry point B. All the K-wires inserted in the supine position at entry point C were correctly placed. All K-wires inserted in the prone position were correctly positioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 studied entry points enabled the correct placement of orthopedic implants for prone position surgery. The best entry point for surgery performed in the supine position was located 2 cm cranially from the standard entry point, along the line prolonging the femoral axis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/188780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The standard starting point for percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion was initially determined at the intersection of the line posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine and the line continuing the anatomical axis of the femur. The technique was pioneered in patients lying prone in surgery, although it has been used with patients in the supine position. The optimal starting point for patients in both prone and supine positions remains uncertain.

Objectives: This cadaveric study aimed to determine the best entry point for the percutaneous insertion of sacroiliac screws depending on the patient's positioning for surgery.

Material and methods: Kirschner wires (K-wires) were percutaneously inserted into the sacral body of 8th human cadavers. In addition to the so-called standard sacroiliac screw entry point (point A), points located consecutively 1 cm (point B) and 2 cm (point C) cranially from the point along the line, prolonging the femoral axis were also studied. The K-wires were inserted into the studied entry points on the right side in a supine position and on the left side of the same cadaver in a prone position. The placement of the K-wires was assessed using radiographic imaging and cadaver dissection.

Results: An analysis of the K-wire placement in the supine position revealed incorrect positioning of 100% of the K-wires inserted at entry point A and 87% at entry point B. All the K-wires inserted in the supine position at entry point C were correctly placed. All K-wires inserted in the prone position were correctly positioned.

Conclusions: All 3 studied entry points enabled the correct placement of orthopedic implants for prone position surgery. The best entry point for surgery performed in the supine position was located 2 cm cranially from the standard entry point, along the line prolonging the femoral axis.

根据患者的手术体位确定经皮插入骶髂螺钉的最佳切入点:尸体研究。
背景:经皮骶髂螺钉插入的标准起始点最初确定为髂前上棘后方的连线与股骨解剖轴连线的交叉点。该技术首先用于俯卧位手术患者,但也用于仰卧位手术患者。俯卧位和仰卧位患者的最佳起始点仍不确定:这项尸体研究旨在根据患者的手术体位,确定经皮插入骶髂螺钉的最佳切入点:将 Kirschner 线(K 线)经皮插入 8 具人体尸体的骶骨中。除了所谓的标准骶髂螺钉插入点(A点)外,还研究了沿延长股骨轴线从该点向颅内连续插入1厘米(B点)和2厘米(C点)的点。在同一尸体的右侧仰卧位和左侧俯卧位,将 K 线插入所研究的切入点。通过放射成像和尸体解剖评估了 K 线的位置:结果:对仰卧位 K 线放置情况的分析表明,100% 的 K 线插入点 A 的位置不正确,87% 的 K 线插入点 B 的位置不正确。在俯卧位插入的所有 K 线均定位正确:所有研究的 3 个切入点都能在俯卧位手术中正确植入骨科植入物。仰卧位手术的最佳进入点位于标准进入点的颅内 2 厘米处,沿着股骨轴延长线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信