Evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two pen-side tests for detecting African swine fever virus in experimentally infected pigs

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 VIROLOGY
Hanh D. Vu, Hung Q. Luong, Huong T.L. Lai, Hoa T. Nguyen, Trang H. Pham, Lam Q. Truong, Giap V. Nguyen, Hiep L.X. Vu
{"title":"Evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two pen-side tests for detecting African swine fever virus in experimentally infected pigs","authors":"Hanh D. Vu,&nbsp;Hung Q. Luong,&nbsp;Huong T.L. Lai,&nbsp;Hoa T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Trang H. Pham,&nbsp;Lam Q. Truong,&nbsp;Giap V. Nguyen,&nbsp;Hiep L.X. Vu","doi":"10.1007/s00705-024-06098-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>African swine fever virus (ASFV) has spread through many countries and regions worldwide, causing significant losses. Timely detection of ASFV-infected pigs is crucial for disease control. In this study, we assessed the performance of two pen-side tests: a portable real-time PCR (qPCR) test for detecting viral genomic DNA and a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for detecting viral antigens. To determine the time from infection to the earliest detection, 10 ASFV-seronegative pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with 10<sup>4.0</sup> hemadsorption dose 50 of a highly virulent ASFV strain. Whole blood and oral swab samples were alternately collected from each group of five pigs daily until all succumbed to the infection. Samples were promptly subjected to the two pen-side tests upon collection, and a subset was transported to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for analysis using a reference qPCR assay. Viral genomic DNA was consistently detected by the reference qPCR assay in all blood samples from 2 days postinfection (dpi), preceding the onset of clinical signs, and in oral swabs from 4 dpi onwards. The portable qPCR test demonstrated comparable performance to the reference qPCR assay for both whole blood and oral swab samples. The LFIA exhibited 100% specificity when testing with whole blood samples but showed reduced sensitivity, particularly for blood samples collected early or late after infection. The antigen test did not perform well with oral swabs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8359,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Virology","volume":"169 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-024-06098-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) has spread through many countries and regions worldwide, causing significant losses. Timely detection of ASFV-infected pigs is crucial for disease control. In this study, we assessed the performance of two pen-side tests: a portable real-time PCR (qPCR) test for detecting viral genomic DNA and a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for detecting viral antigens. To determine the time from infection to the earliest detection, 10 ASFV-seronegative pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with 104.0 hemadsorption dose 50 of a highly virulent ASFV strain. Whole blood and oral swab samples were alternately collected from each group of five pigs daily until all succumbed to the infection. Samples were promptly subjected to the two pen-side tests upon collection, and a subset was transported to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for analysis using a reference qPCR assay. Viral genomic DNA was consistently detected by the reference qPCR assay in all blood samples from 2 days postinfection (dpi), preceding the onset of clinical signs, and in oral swabs from 4 dpi onwards. The portable qPCR test demonstrated comparable performance to the reference qPCR assay for both whole blood and oral swab samples. The LFIA exhibited 100% specificity when testing with whole blood samples but showed reduced sensitivity, particularly for blood samples collected early or late after infection. The antigen test did not perform well with oral swabs.

Abstract Image

评估用于检测实验感染猪体内非洲猪瘟病毒的两种栏边检测方法的诊断灵敏度和特异性。
非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)已在全球许多国家和地区蔓延,造成了重大损失。及时检测感染 ASFV 的猪对疾病控制至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种栏边检测方法的性能:用于检测病毒基因组 DNA 的便携式实时 PCR (qPCR) 检测方法和用于检测病毒抗原的侧流免疫分析法 (LFIA)。为了确定从感染到最早检测到病毒的时间,给 10 头 ASFV 阴性猪肌肉注射了 104.0 血吸虫剂量 50 的高致病性 ASFV 毒株。每天交替采集每组 5 头猪的全血和口腔拭子样本,直到所有猪感染死亡。样本在采集后立即进行两种栏边检测,并将一部分样本运送到兽医诊断实验室,使用参考 qPCR 分析法进行分析。参考 qPCR 检测法在感染后 2 天(临床症状出现前)起的所有血液样本和 4 天(临床症状出现前)起的口腔拭子中都能检测到病毒基因组 DNA。在全血和口腔拭子样本中,便携式 qPCR 检验的性能与参考 qPCR 检验相当。在检测全血样本时,LFIA 的特异性为 100%,但灵敏度有所降低,尤其是在感染后早期或晚期采集的血液样本中。抗原检测在检测口腔拭子时效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Virology
Archives of Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
324
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Virology publishes original contributions from all branches of research on viruses, virus-like agents, and virus infections of humans, animals, plants, insects, and bacteria. Coverage spans a broad spectrum of topics, from descriptions of newly discovered viruses, to studies of virus structure, composition, and genetics, to studies of virus interactions with host cells, organisms and populations. Studies employ molecular biologic, molecular genetics, and current immunologic and epidemiologic approaches. Contents include studies on the molecular pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and genetics of virus infections in individual hosts, and studies on the molecular epidemiology of virus infections in populations. Also included are studies involving applied research such as diagnostic technology development, monoclonal antibody panel development, vaccine development, and antiviral drug development.Archives of Virology wishes to publish obituaries of recently deceased well-known virologists and leading figures in virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信