Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis and Management: Insights from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Study

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis and Management: Insights from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Limited data exist regarding familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis and treatment in diverse populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>We sought to assess patient characteristics and current treatment patterns among individuals with FH and/or elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in a diverse real-world cohort within the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined data from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program, a cross-sectional study beginning in 2015 inclusive of historically underrepresented groups. Among participants with &gt;1 LDL-C measurement, we examined lipid-lowering medication utilization and treatment patterns among participants with and without FH diagnosis stratified by LDL-C. We additionally examined whether sex differences existed in treatment and diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 369,483 All of Us participants age ≥18 years, our study sample included 113,153 individuals who had at least one LDL-C measurement. Of these, 4018 (3.5%) had LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL, 733 (0.26%) had LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, and 434 were diagnosed with FH (0.37%). Statin usage was found to be higher among men compared to women both in those with FH (84% vs. 70.3%, p=0.002) and without FH (54.2% vs. 39.2%, p&lt;0.001) irrespective of LDL-C measures. Women tended to have higher mean LDL-C levels compared to men (130.9 mg/dL vs. 105.8 mg/dL, p&lt;0.001 in those with FH and 106.9 mg/dL vs. 98.8 mg/dL p&lt;0.001 in those without FH). Participants with FH were also more likely to be on statin therapy (75.2% vs 44.8%, p-value &lt;0.001) with 18.4% on two or more types of lipid-lowering agents. Despite this, a higher percentage of FH participants had a history of &gt;1 major ASCVD event (19.4% vs 10.7%, p-value &lt;0.001), and exhibited higher mean LDL-C levels (121.9 mg/dL vs 103.9 mg/dL) compared to non-FH participants. Notably, only 30.5% of FH participants achieved the recommended LDL-C&lt;100 mg/dL compared to 45.7% of those without FH (p-value&lt;0.001). Furthermore, a majority (60.6%) of those already diagnosed with FH had LDL-C &lt;130 mg/dL, including those not taking a lipid-lowering drug (Figure 1), questioning whether FH is being incorrectly diagnosed in some patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the under and possible inappropriate diagnosis of FH and inadequate treatment of those diagnosed with FH among a real-world population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Synopsis

Limited data exist regarding familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis and treatment in diverse populations.

Objective/Purpose

We sought to assess patient characteristics and current treatment patterns among individuals with FH and/or elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in a diverse real-world cohort within the United States.

Methods

We examined data from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program, a cross-sectional study beginning in 2015 inclusive of historically underrepresented groups. Among participants with >1 LDL-C measurement, we examined lipid-lowering medication utilization and treatment patterns among participants with and without FH diagnosis stratified by LDL-C. We additionally examined whether sex differences existed in treatment and diagnosis.

Results

Among 369,483 All of Us participants age ≥18 years, our study sample included 113,153 individuals who had at least one LDL-C measurement. Of these, 4018 (3.5%) had LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL, 733 (0.26%) had LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, and 434 were diagnosed with FH (0.37%). Statin usage was found to be higher among men compared to women both in those with FH (84% vs. 70.3%, p=0.002) and without FH (54.2% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001) irrespective of LDL-C measures. Women tended to have higher mean LDL-C levels compared to men (130.9 mg/dL vs. 105.8 mg/dL, p<0.001 in those with FH and 106.9 mg/dL vs. 98.8 mg/dL p<0.001 in those without FH). Participants with FH were also more likely to be on statin therapy (75.2% vs 44.8%, p-value <0.001) with 18.4% on two or more types of lipid-lowering agents. Despite this, a higher percentage of FH participants had a history of >1 major ASCVD event (19.4% vs 10.7%, p-value <0.001), and exhibited higher mean LDL-C levels (121.9 mg/dL vs 103.9 mg/dL) compared to non-FH participants. Notably, only 30.5% of FH participants achieved the recommended LDL-C<100 mg/dL compared to 45.7% of those without FH (p-value<0.001). Furthermore, a majority (60.6%) of those already diagnosed with FH had LDL-C <130 mg/dL, including those not taking a lipid-lowering drug (Figure 1), questioning whether FH is being incorrectly diagnosed in some patients.

Conclusions

This study highlights the under and possible inappropriate diagnosis of FH and inadequate treatment of those diagnosed with FH among a real-world population.

家族性高胆固醇血症的诊断与管理:美国国立卫生研究院精准医学计划 "我们所有人 "研究的启示
背景/简介有关不同人群中家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)诊断和治疗的数据有限。目标/目的我们试图评估美国不同现实世界队列中 FH 和/或低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)升高个体的患者特征和当前治疗模式。方法我们研究了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)精准医学倡议 "我们所有人 "研究项目的数据,这是一项始于 2015 年的横断面研究,其中包括历史上代表性不足的群体。在进行了>1次低密度脂蛋白胆固醇测量的参与者中,我们研究了按低密度脂蛋白胆固醇分层的有FH诊断和无FH诊断参与者的降脂药物使用情况和治疗模式。结果在 369,483 名年龄≥18 岁的全美参与者中,我们的研究样本包括 113,153 名至少进行过一次低密度脂蛋白胆固醇测量的人。其中,4018 人(3.5%)的 LDL-C≥160 mg/dL,733 人(0.26%)的 LDL-C≥190 mg/dL,434 人被诊断为 FH(0.37%)。无论低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的测量结果如何,在 FH 患者(84% 对 70.3%,p=0.002)和非 FH 患者(54.2% 对 39.2%,p<0.001)中,男性使用他汀类药物的比例均高于女性。女性的平均低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平往往高于男性(FH 患者为 130.9 mg/dL 对 105.8 mg/dL,p<0.001;非 FH 患者为 106.9 mg/dL 对 98.8 mg/dL,p<0.001)。FH患者也更有可能接受他汀类药物治疗(75.2% vs 44.8%,p值为<0.001),其中18.4%的患者接受两种或两种以上的降脂药物治疗。尽管如此,与非 FH 参与者相比,有更高比例的 FH 参与者曾发生过>1 次重大 ASCVD 事件(19.4% vs 10.7%,p 值为<0.001),并表现出更高的平均 LDL-C 水平(121.9 mg/dL vs 103.9 mg/dL)。值得注意的是,只有 30.5% 的 FH 参与者达到了推荐的 LDL-C<100 mg/dL,而非 FH 参与者的这一比例为 45.7%(p 值<0.001)。此外,大多数(60.6%)已确诊为 FH 的患者的 LDL-C <130 mg/dL,包括那些未服用降脂药物的人(图 1),这让人怀疑是否有些患者的 FH 诊断有误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. While preference is given to material of immediate practical concern, the science that underpins lipidology is forwarded by expert contributors so that evidence-based approaches to reducing cardiovascular and coronary heart disease can be made immediately available to our readers. Sections of the Journal will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信