Comparing reach distance between the Y-Balance Test-Lower Quarter and Star Excursion Balance Test: Are practitioners using the correct protocol?

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q1 REHABILITATION

Physical Therapy in Sport Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.007

James G. Bodden, Robert A. Needham, Nachiappan Chockalingam

{"title":"Comparing reach distance between the Y-Balance Test-Lower Quarter and Star Excursion Balance Test: Are practitioners using the correct protocol?","authors":"James G. Bodden, Robert A. Needham, Nachiappan Chockalingam","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare reach distances between the YBT-LQ and SEBT using the correct protocols as outlined by the developers. This will provide an accurate insight on the actual magnitude differences in reach distance between the movement screen tests and will safeguard practitioners on the subsequent use of these outcomes to inform clinical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants included sixteen healthy female subjects from the university and amateur sports teams.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome</h3><p>Reach distances in the anterior direction (ANT), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) between participants on the YBT-LQ and SEBT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The principal findings highlighted that a statistically significantly greater reach distance on the left and right side for the YBT-LQ compared to the SEBT in the ANT, PM, and PL directions (p < 0.0005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the YBT-LQ and SEBT are not comparable tests due to the differences in reach distance and methodological differences. Therefore, previous, and future research using the YBT-LQ and SEBT cannot be used interchangeably. Not following developed guidelines questions the applicability of the findings of reach distance scores to infer on performance and assessment of injury risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786/pdfft?md5=41ccb0dc4224c253005bc907368427b9&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000786-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare reach distances between the YBT-LQ and SEBT using the correct protocols as outlined by the developers. This will provide an accurate insight on the actual magnitude differences in reach distance between the movement screen tests and will safeguard practitioners on the subsequent use of these outcomes to inform clinical decision making.

Design

Observational.

Setting

Laboratory.

Participants

Participants included sixteen healthy female subjects from the university and amateur sports teams.

Main outcome

Reach distances in the anterior direction (ANT), posterior medial (PM) and posterior lateral (PL) between participants on the YBT-LQ and SEBT.

Results

The principal findings highlighted that a statistically significantly greater reach distance on the left and right side for the YBT-LQ compared to the SEBT in the ANT, PM, and PL directions (p < 0.0005).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that the YBT-LQ and SEBT are not comparable tests due to the differences in reach distance and methodological differences. Therefore, previous, and future research using the YBT-LQ and SEBT cannot be used interchangeably. Not following developed guidelines questions the applicability of the findings of reach distance scores to infer on performance and assessment of injury risk.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较Y型平衡测试-下四分位和星形偏移平衡测试的到达距离：练习者是否使用了正确的协议？

目标按照开发人员概述的正确方案，比较 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 的伸展距离。这将为运动筛查测试之间的伸展距离的实际大小差异提供准确的见解，并为从业人员随后使用这些结果为临床决策提供依据提供保障。主要结果参加者在 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 中的前方（ANT）、后内侧（PM）和后外侧（PL）的伸展距离.结果主要研究结果表明，与 SEBT 相比，YBT-LQ 在 ANT、PM 和 PL 方向上的左侧和右侧伸展距离具有显著的统计学意义（P < 0.结论本研究的结果表明，YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 由于在触及距离和方法上的差异而不具有可比性。因此，以前和未来使用 YBT-LQ 和 SEBT 的研究不能互换使用。如果不遵循已制定的指导原则，就会质疑伸展距离评分结果在推断运动表现和评估受伤风险方面的适用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

8.30%

发文量

125

审稿时长

39 days

期刊介绍： Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.