Comparison of conventional linear regression method and interpretable artificial neural network for copper determination using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge

IF 3.2 2区 化学 Q1 SPECTROSCOPY
Hoang Bao Khanh , Nguyen Lam Duy , Nguyen Anh Tien , Nguyen Huynh Duy Khang
{"title":"Comparison of conventional linear regression method and interpretable artificial neural network for copper determination using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge","authors":"Hoang Bao Khanh ,&nbsp;Nguyen Lam Duy ,&nbsp;Nguyen Anh Tien ,&nbsp;Nguyen Huynh Duy Khang","doi":"10.1016/j.sab.2024.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents an investigation of solution cathode glow discharge (SCGD) - optical emission spectroscopy (OES) using an artificial neural network (ANN) for Cu determination. The glow discharge from the SCGD cell was generated to collect 3600 spectra of twelve Cu concentrations from 2.2 mg/L to 40.7 mg/L as the training/validation and testing dataset for two ANN models. Their performances were then compared with the conventional linear regression calibrated at the Cu emission line of 324.8 nm. The accuracy of the ANN models was improved from 3% to 5% in the second and the first ANN models, respectively, while their precision can enhance from 2% at a Cu concentration of 40.7 mg/L to 12% at a Cu concentration of 2.2 mg/L. The detection limit can be reduced from 1.2 mg/L by linear regression to 0.3 mg/L by ANN models. We also confirmed that the performance of ANN models is in agreement with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), with a difference of accuracy below 3% in tracking three different Cu concentrations. To interpret the ANN model, ANN ‘s weight characterization was analyzed, and its results show that ANN can recognize the critical emission lines that affect the prediction results and can separate the spectral line even in spectrum superposition. This demonstrated the ability of ANN in improving accuracy and precision to trace heavy metal using the SCGD-OES spectra.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21890,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0584854724001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents an investigation of solution cathode glow discharge (SCGD) - optical emission spectroscopy (OES) using an artificial neural network (ANN) for Cu determination. The glow discharge from the SCGD cell was generated to collect 3600 spectra of twelve Cu concentrations from 2.2 mg/L to 40.7 mg/L as the training/validation and testing dataset for two ANN models. Their performances were then compared with the conventional linear regression calibrated at the Cu emission line of 324.8 nm. The accuracy of the ANN models was improved from 3% to 5% in the second and the first ANN models, respectively, while their precision can enhance from 2% at a Cu concentration of 40.7 mg/L to 12% at a Cu concentration of 2.2 mg/L. The detection limit can be reduced from 1.2 mg/L by linear regression to 0.3 mg/L by ANN models. We also confirmed that the performance of ANN models is in agreement with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), with a difference of accuracy below 3% in tracking three different Cu concentrations. To interpret the ANN model, ANN ‘s weight characterization was analyzed, and its results show that ANN can recognize the critical emission lines that affect the prediction results and can separate the spectral line even in spectrum superposition. This demonstrated the ability of ANN in improving accuracy and precision to trace heavy metal using the SCGD-OES spectra.

Abstract Image

利用溶液阴极辉光放电光学发射光谱测定铜的传统线性回归法与可解释人工神经网络的比较
本研究利用人工神经网络 (ANN) 对溶液阴极辉光放电 (SCGD) - 光学发射光谱 (OES) 进行了研究,以测定铜。从 SCGD 池产生的辉光放电收集了从 2.2 mg/L 到 40.7 mg/L 的 12 种铜浓度的 3600 个光谱,作为两个 ANN 模型的训练/验证和测试数据集。然后将它们的性能与在 324.8 纳米铜发射线校准的传统线性回归进行比较。在第二个和第一个 ANN 模型中,ANN 模型的准确度分别从 3% 提高到 5%,而精度则从铜浓度为 40.7 mg/L 时的 2% 提高到铜浓度为 2.2 mg/L 时的 12%。检测限可从线性回归的 1.2 mg/L 降至 ANN 模型的 0.3 mg/L。我们还证实,ANN 模型与电感耦合等离子体-光学发射光谱(ICP-OES)的性能一致,在跟踪三种不同的铜浓度时,精度差异低于 3%。为了解释 ANN 模型,对 ANN 的权重特征进行了分析,结果表明 ANN 能够识别影响预测结果的关键发射线,即使在光谱叠加的情况下也能分离光谱线。这证明了 ANN 在提高利用 SCGD-OES 光谱溯源重金属的准确性和精确度方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, is intended for the rapid publication of both original work and reviews in the following fields: Atomic Emission (AES), Atomic Absorption (AAS) and Atomic Fluorescence (AFS) spectroscopy; Mass Spectrometry (MS) for inorganic analysis covering Spark Source (SS-MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-MS), Glow Discharge (GD-MS), and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS). Laser induced atomic spectroscopy for inorganic analysis, including non-linear optical laser spectroscopy, covering Laser Enhanced Ionization (LEI), Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF), Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (RIS) and Resonance Ionization Mass Spectrometry (RIMS); Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS); Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy (CRDS), Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (LA-ICP-AES) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). X-ray spectrometry, X-ray Optics and Microanalysis, including X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and related techniques, in particular Total-reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (TXRF), and Synchrotron Radiation-excited Total reflection XRF (SR-TXRF). Manuscripts dealing with (i) fundamentals, (ii) methodology development, (iii)instrumentation, and (iv) applications, can be submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信