Commercially Available Guides Overestimate Socket Length During Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Socket Retrograde Drilling

Q3 Medicine
Emily R. McDermott M.D. , Michael Proffitt Ph.D. , Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. , Bjorn Christian Balldin M.D.
{"title":"Commercially Available Guides Overestimate Socket Length During Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Socket Retrograde Drilling","authors":"Emily R. McDermott M.D. ,&nbsp;Michael Proffitt Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. ,&nbsp;Bjorn Christian Balldin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To objectively assess the accuracy of socket measurements taken during cruciate ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reaming technique.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six complete knee sawbone specimens were used to ream anterior and posterior cruciate ligament sockets in the femur and tibia in a retrograde fashion using a standard retrograde reaming device. The longest and shortest sides of the sockets were measured using a ruler. One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests were used to evaluate whether the actual measured socket length matched the estimated length set on the drill guide.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One fellowship-trained surgeon reamed 24 total sockets in sawbone specimens using guides. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the estimated measurement and the actual shortest tunnel length in each of the sockets. The median short side socket lengths were shorter than their respective intended depths by 4 mm for the femoral anterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the femoral posterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the tibial anterior cruciate ligament socket, and 4.5 mm for the tibial posterior cruciate ligament socket. All differences were significant at α = 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The estimated cruciate socket lengths reamed during ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reamer and standard intra-articular measuring instrumentation were greater than the actual measured socket lengths.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Successful cruciate ligament reconstruction relies on accurate socket measurements. This study examined the accuracy of commercially available cruciate ligament socket drill guides and the implications for clinical practice, to include graft-tunnel mismatch and surface area available for healing. Surgeons may consider reaming slightly longer than estimated sockets when performing all-inside cruciate ligament reconstructions to ensure appropriate socket depth for graft fixation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000312/pdfft?md5=5de08460b433d2510bc1a6a2ef16257e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000312-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To objectively assess the accuracy of socket measurements taken during cruciate ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reaming technique.

Methods

Six complete knee sawbone specimens were used to ream anterior and posterior cruciate ligament sockets in the femur and tibia in a retrograde fashion using a standard retrograde reaming device. The longest and shortest sides of the sockets were measured using a ruler. One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests were used to evaluate whether the actual measured socket length matched the estimated length set on the drill guide.

Results

One fellowship-trained surgeon reamed 24 total sockets in sawbone specimens using guides. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the estimated measurement and the actual shortest tunnel length in each of the sockets. The median short side socket lengths were shorter than their respective intended depths by 4 mm for the femoral anterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the femoral posterior cruciate ligament socket, 6 mm for the tibial anterior cruciate ligament socket, and 4.5 mm for the tibial posterior cruciate ligament socket. All differences were significant at α = 0.05.

Conclusions

The estimated cruciate socket lengths reamed during ligament reconstruction using a retrograde reamer and standard intra-articular measuring instrumentation were greater than the actual measured socket lengths.

Clinical Relevance

Successful cruciate ligament reconstruction relies on accurate socket measurements. This study examined the accuracy of commercially available cruciate ligament socket drill guides and the implications for clinical practice, to include graft-tunnel mismatch and surface area available for healing. Surgeons may consider reaming slightly longer than estimated sockets when performing all-inside cruciate ligament reconstructions to ensure appropriate socket depth for graft fixation.

在前后十字韧带臼逆行钻孔过程中,市售导向器高估了臼长度
方法使用六块完整的膝锯骨标本,使用标准逆行铰接装置,以逆行方式铰接股骨和胫骨的前交叉韧带和后交叉韧带套筒。用直尺测量韧带臼的最长边和最短边。使用单侧Wilcoxon符号秩和检验来评估实际测量的关节窝长度是否与钻导上设定的估计长度一致。统计分析表明,每个牙槽窝的估计测量值与实际最短隧道长度之间存在显著差异。股骨前十字韧带髋臼短边长度的中位数比各自的预定深度短4毫米,股骨后十字韧带髋臼短6毫米,胫骨前十字韧带髋臼短6毫米,胫骨后十字韧带髋臼短4.5毫米。结论在韧带重建过程中使用逆行铰刀和标准关节内测量仪器铰制的十字韧带臼估计长度大于实际测量的臼长度。临床意义成功的十字韧带重建依赖于精确的臼测量。本研究考察了市售十字韧带臼钻导向器的准确性以及对临床实践的影响,包括移植物-隧道不匹配和可用于愈合的表面积。外科医生在进行全内侧十字韧带重建时,可考虑钻孔深度略长于预计的臼,以确保移植物固定时有适当的臼深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信