Assessing the impact of educational eHealth and mHealth interventions on health outcomes in continuity of care for enterostomy patients: A meta-analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"Assessing the impact of educational eHealth and mHealth interventions on health outcomes in continuity of care for enterostomy patients: A meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of educational eHealth and mHealth interventions on self-care ability, quality of life (QoL), ostomy complications and other health outcomes in enterostomy patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive database search yielded 7385 records, which were narrowed down to 13 RCTs through stringent PRISMA-guided selection. These studies, conducted globally from 2015 to 2023, involved a total of 1530 participants and employed various eHealth and mHealth platforms, from mobile apps to telehealth systems. Primary outcomes assessed were self-care ability, QoL, and ostomy complications, mostly analyzed using a random-effects model due to inherent study heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The meta-analysis showed significant improvements in self-care ability (SMD = 0.85, CI = [0.23, 1.47], P = 0.007) and QoL (SMD = 0.64, CI = [0.50, 0.79], P &lt; 0.001) among participants receiving eHealth and mHealth interventions compared to those receiving standard care. eHealth and mHealth interventions also led to a reduction in ostomy complications (SMD = 0.18, CI = [0.12, 0.27], P &lt; 0.001). Secondary outcomes revealed significant improvements in stoma adjustment (SMD = 1.13, CI = [0.70, 1.56], P &lt; 0.001) and self-efficacy (SMD = 0.51, CI = [0.38, 0.64], P &lt; 0.001). The effects on psychological well-being were mixed, with some studies showing benefits in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms, albeit with high heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>eHealth and mHealth interventions appear effective in improving essential health outcomes for enterostomy patients, though the heterogeneity among studies suggests that results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of these interventions underscores the need for their integration into routine care, tailored to individual patient needs and local healthcare settings. Further research is required to determine the most effective eHealth and mHealth modalities and to explore their long-term benefits and scalability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001741/pdfft?md5=e40b3eff44044f3daf6d255e6cd418ed&pid=1-s2.0-S1462388924001741-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of educational eHealth and mHealth interventions on self-care ability, quality of life (QoL), ostomy complications and other health outcomes in enterostomy patients.

Methods

A comprehensive database search yielded 7385 records, which were narrowed down to 13 RCTs through stringent PRISMA-guided selection. These studies, conducted globally from 2015 to 2023, involved a total of 1530 participants and employed various eHealth and mHealth platforms, from mobile apps to telehealth systems. Primary outcomes assessed were self-care ability, QoL, and ostomy complications, mostly analyzed using a random-effects model due to inherent study heterogeneity.

Results

The meta-analysis showed significant improvements in self-care ability (SMD = 0.85, CI = [0.23, 1.47], P = 0.007) and QoL (SMD = 0.64, CI = [0.50, 0.79], P < 0.001) among participants receiving eHealth and mHealth interventions compared to those receiving standard care. eHealth and mHealth interventions also led to a reduction in ostomy complications (SMD = 0.18, CI = [0.12, 0.27], P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes revealed significant improvements in stoma adjustment (SMD = 1.13, CI = [0.70, 1.56], P < 0.001) and self-efficacy (SMD = 0.51, CI = [0.38, 0.64], P < 0.001). The effects on psychological well-being were mixed, with some studies showing benefits in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms, albeit with high heterogeneity.

Conclusions

eHealth and mHealth interventions appear effective in improving essential health outcomes for enterostomy patients, though the heterogeneity among studies suggests that results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of these interventions underscores the need for their integration into routine care, tailored to individual patient needs and local healthcare settings. Further research is required to determine the most effective eHealth and mHealth modalities and to explore their long-term benefits and scalability.

评估教育性电子健康和移动健康干预对肠造口术患者持续护理健康结果的影响:元分析
目的 评估教育性电子健康和移动健康干预措施对肠造口术患者的自我护理能力、生活质量(QoL)、造口并发症和其他健康结果的影响。方法 通过全面的数据库搜索获得了 7385 条记录,并在严格的 PRISMA 指导下筛选出 13 项 RCT。这些研究于 2015 年至 2023 年在全球范围内进行,共有 1530 人参与,采用了从移动应用程序到远程医疗系统等各种电子健康和移动健康平台。评估的主要结果包括自我护理能力、QoL 和造口并发症,由于研究本身存在异质性,因此大多采用随机效应模型进行分析。与接受标准护理的参与者相比,接受电子健康和移动健康干预的参与者的自我护理能力(SMD = 0.85,CI = [0.23,1.47],P = 0.007)和生活质量(SMD = 0.64,CI = [0.50,0.79],P < 0.001)均有明显改善。电子健康和移动健康干预还可减少造口并发症(SMD = 0.18,CI = [0.12,0.27],P < 0.001)。次要结果显示,造口适应性(SMD = 1.13,CI = [0.70,1.56],P < 0.001)和自我效能感(SMD = 0.51,CI = [0.38,0.64],P < 0.001)均有明显改善。对心理健康的影响好坏参半,一些研究显示在减少抑郁和焦虑症状方面有益处,但异质性很高。结论健康和移动医疗干预措施似乎能有效改善肠造口患者的基本健康状况,但研究之间的异质性表明,应谨慎解释研究结果。这些干预措施的有效性突出表明,有必要根据患者的个人需求和当地医疗环境将其纳入常规护理中。要确定最有效的电子健康和移动健康模式并探索其长期益处和可扩展性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信