Pasitikėjimas valstybe ir gyventojų subjektyvi gerovė: 21 valstybės duomenys

Tadas Vadvilavičius
{"title":"Pasitikėjimas valstybe ir gyventojų subjektyvi gerovė: 21 valstybės duomenys","authors":"Tadas Vadvilavičius","doi":"10.15388/psichol.2024.70.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In psychological research, greater attention is paid to the closest social systems of a person and their importance for that person’s well-being. However, it cannot be ruled out that the state-level social system and its assessment can also be significant predictors of a person’s subjective well-being. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an individual’s trust in parliament, political parties, the political and legal system, and the police on life satisfaction and subjective happiness. Data from the European Social Survey Round 10, which includes 21 countries (n = 34079), were used for the analysis. The results revealed that the people have the most trust in the police and the least trust in political parties. Additionally, the results show that men trust parliament and the legal system more than women and are more satisfied with life. Structural equation modeling revealed that trust in the state predicts higher life satisfaction and subjective well-being. The results revealed that the state, as the highest social system, is also significant for a person’s subjective well-being. The results also showed differences between countries. The obtained research findings open up possibilities for further research.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"24 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/psichol.2024.70.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In psychological research, greater attention is paid to the closest social systems of a person and their importance for that person’s well-being. However, it cannot be ruled out that the state-level social system and its assessment can also be significant predictors of a person’s subjective well-being. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an individual’s trust in parliament, political parties, the political and legal system, and the police on life satisfaction and subjective happiness. Data from the European Social Survey Round 10, which includes 21 countries (n = 34079), were used for the analysis. The results revealed that the people have the most trust in the police and the least trust in political parties. Additionally, the results show that men trust parliament and the legal system more than women and are more satisfied with life. Structural equation modeling revealed that trust in the state predicts higher life satisfaction and subjective well-being. The results revealed that the state, as the highest social system, is also significant for a person’s subjective well-being. The results also showed differences between countries. The obtained research findings open up possibilities for further research.
对国家的信任与主观幸福感:来自 21 个国家的证据
在心理学研究中,人们更多关注的是一个人最亲近的社会系统及其对该人幸福的重要性。然而,不排除国家层面的社会体系及其评估也会对一个人的主观幸福感产生重要的预测作用。本研究旨在确定个人对议会、政党、政治和法律体系以及警察的信任对生活满意度和主观幸福感的影响。分析采用了欧洲社会调查第 10 轮的数据,其中包括 21 个国家(n = 34079)。结果显示,人们对警察的信任度最高,对政党的信任度最低。此外,结果显示,男性比女性更信任议会和法律系统,对生活的满意度更高。结构方程模型显示,对国家的信任可预测较高的生活满意度和主观幸福感。结果显示,国家作为最高的社会体系,对个人的主观幸福感也有重要影响。结果还显示了国家之间的差异。这些研究成果为进一步研究提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信