Digital radiographic evaluation of obturation quality in primary molars using two obturation techniques: An in vivo study

Syeda Najeya Banu, Sunil Raj N, Anitha Anand, Nandan N, Soundarya V, Supriya P R
{"title":"Digital radiographic evaluation of obturation quality in primary molars using two obturation techniques: An in vivo study","authors":"Syeda Najeya Banu, Sunil Raj N, Anitha Anand, Nandan N, Soundarya V, Supriya P R","doi":"10.18231/j.idjsr.2024.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare two different obturation techniques such as incremental technique and slow-speed motor-driven lentulo spiral technique and to evaluate its obturation quality using digital radiography. The study included children aged four to seven years with pulpally affected mandibular primary molars that required pulpectomy. A total of 36 primary molars (8 maxillary and 28 mandibular) were selected and randomly split into two groups of 18 teeth each. In Group I, obturation was performed using a hand plugger, whereas in Group II, it was done with a slow-speed motor-driven lentulo spiral. A digital intraoral receptor was used to assess the quality of obturation and the presence of voids. The data were statistically analyzed. The Chi-square test was performed to compare between groups.Results: Statistical analysis by Chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference regarding the quality of obturation between the groups with respect to the apical seal. Group1 showed more optimal filling than Group 2. No significant difference was evident among the two groups concerning voids (P = 1.00).The incremental technique produced ideal obturation compared to the motor-driven lentulo spiral technique.","PeriodicalId":383292,"journal":{"name":"International Dental Journal of Student's Research","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Dental Journal of Student's Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.idjsr.2024.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare two different obturation techniques such as incremental technique and slow-speed motor-driven lentulo spiral technique and to evaluate its obturation quality using digital radiography. The study included children aged four to seven years with pulpally affected mandibular primary molars that required pulpectomy. A total of 36 primary molars (8 maxillary and 28 mandibular) were selected and randomly split into two groups of 18 teeth each. In Group I, obturation was performed using a hand plugger, whereas in Group II, it was done with a slow-speed motor-driven lentulo spiral. A digital intraoral receptor was used to assess the quality of obturation and the presence of voids. The data were statistically analyzed. The Chi-square test was performed to compare between groups.Results: Statistical analysis by Chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference regarding the quality of obturation between the groups with respect to the apical seal. Group1 showed more optimal filling than Group 2. No significant difference was evident among the two groups concerning voids (P = 1.00).The incremental technique produced ideal obturation compared to the motor-driven lentulo spiral technique.
使用两种咬合技术对初级磨牙的咬合质量进行数字射线评估:活体研究
比较两种不同的封髓技术,如增量技术和慢速马达驱动皮瓣螺旋技术,并使用数字射线摄影评估其封髓质量。研究对象包括患有牙髓受影响的下颌初级磨牙并需要进行牙髓切除术的四至七岁儿童。共选取了 36 颗初级磨牙(8 颗上颌和 28 颗下颌),随机分成两组,每组 18 颗。第一组使用手动塞牙器进行封堵,而第二组则使用慢速马达驱动的螺旋式封堵器进行封堵。使用数字口内感受器评估窝沟封闭的质量和是否存在空隙。对数据进行了统计分析。组间比较采用卡方检验:结果:通过卡方检验进行的统计分析显示,在根尖封闭方面,各组之间的充填质量存在显著差异。第一组比第二组显示出更理想的充填效果,两组在空隙方面没有明显差异(P = 1.00)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信