Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial

Q3 Dentistry
J. J. Patel, N. Shah, K. Janani, S. Mahalaxmi, Priya Porwal, Aishwarya D. Jain
{"title":"Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"J. J. Patel, N. Shah, K. Janani, S. Mahalaxmi, Priya Porwal, Aishwarya D. Jain","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_93_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of the study was to assess the sealing efficacy of three dam seal materials.\n \n \n \n Ninety participants were enrolled after obtaining consent. After the placement of rubber dam (RD), a stream of air was applied at the interface area and visualized at ×6 magnification to identify sealing ability. Dam seal materials were divided into Group A: Liquid Dam, Group B: Kool-Dam, and Group C: OraSeal caulking putty substance. Leakage was assessed using self-designed criteria such as sealing ability, retention, ease of adaptability, and removal. The data were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS 20 software.\n \n \n \n Kool-Dam (Group B) demonstrated superior effectiveness in controlling saliva seepage around the clamp and teeth (P = 0.039) compared to other groups. In addition, it was evident that Kool-Dam (Group B) had greater effectiveness as compared to Liquid Dam and OraSeal (Group C) with relation to the retention of dam seal material (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the ease of adaptation or removal of dam seal material.\n \n \n \n This study highlights the importance of dam seal materials as an adjunct material to establish a tight seal over a RD placement. From the present study, it was evident that Kool-Dam exhibited superior performance over Liquid Dam and OraSeal dam seal material in terms of better sealing ability and retention of the dam seal materials.\n","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_93_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the sealing efficacy of three dam seal materials. Ninety participants were enrolled after obtaining consent. After the placement of rubber dam (RD), a stream of air was applied at the interface area and visualized at ×6 magnification to identify sealing ability. Dam seal materials were divided into Group A: Liquid Dam, Group B: Kool-Dam, and Group C: OraSeal caulking putty substance. Leakage was assessed using self-designed criteria such as sealing ability, retention, ease of adaptability, and removal. The data were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS 20 software. Kool-Dam (Group B) demonstrated superior effectiveness in controlling saliva seepage around the clamp and teeth (P = 0.039) compared to other groups. In addition, it was evident that Kool-Dam (Group B) had greater effectiveness as compared to Liquid Dam and OraSeal (Group C) with relation to the retention of dam seal material (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the ease of adaptation or removal of dam seal material. This study highlights the importance of dam seal materials as an adjunct material to establish a tight seal over a RD placement. From the present study, it was evident that Kool-Dam exhibited superior performance over Liquid Dam and OraSeal dam seal material in terms of better sealing ability and retention of the dam seal materials.
用于隔离手术的各种橡胶坝屏障材料的密封效果:随机对照试验
这项研究旨在评估三种水坝密封材料的密封效果。 在征得同意后,90 名参与者参加了研究。放置橡胶坝(RD)后,在界面区域注入气流,并在 ×6 倍放大镜下观察,以确定密封能力。水坝密封材料分为 A 组液体坝、B 组:Kool-Dam 和 C 组:OraSeal 填缝腻子物质。渗漏情况采用自行设计的标准进行评估,如密封能力、保持力、适应性和清除的难易程度。数据使用 IBM SPSS 20 软件进行制表和分析。 与其他组相比,Kool-Dam(B 组)在控制夹钳和牙齿周围的唾液渗出方面表现出更高的有效性(P = 0.039)。此外,Kool-Dam(B 组)与 Liquid Dam 和 OraSeal(C 组)相比,在保持水坝密封材料方面显然更有效(P = 0.039)。在适应或去除水坝密封材料的难易程度方面,两者没有明显的统计学差异(P < 0.05)。 这项研究强调了坝体密封材料作为一种辅助材料,对在 RD 置位上建立严密密封的重要性。从本研究中可以明显看出,Kool-Dam 在密封能力和坝封材料的保留方面优于 Liquid Dam 和 OraSeal 坝封材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信