Clinical Characteristics, Predictors for Mortality and Comparison of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Five-Factor Score on Survival in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Hong Kong

Joshua Ka Ho Yeung, Joyce Kit Yu Young
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics, Predictors for Mortality and Comparison of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Five-Factor Score on Survival in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Hong Kong","authors":"Joshua Ka Ho Yeung, Joyce Kit Yu Young","doi":"10.1142/s2661341724500020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the clinical profile and predictors of mortality of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients in Hong Kong. To compare the accuracy of the latest Five-Factor Score (FFS-2009) and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) in prediction of survival with this local cohort. Methods: A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed AAV patients, from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2022, managed in the Kowloon West Cluster (KWC) hospitals in Hong Kong. Demographic and baseline characteristics, clinical profile, and treatment profile were reviewed. Factors associated with mortality were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model. The performances of FFS and BVAS in mortality prediction were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 83 AAV patients were included in the study. The median age was 70.5 years at diagnosis. Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA; 69.9%) was the most common AAV subtype. The median FFS and BVAS were 2 and 20, respectively. The overall mortality was 45.6% across the study period. Multivariate Cox regression identified age at diagnosis (HR 1.043, [Formula: see text]), stabilized peak serum creatinine (HR 1.002, [Formula: see text]), hemoglobin level (HR 0.754, [Formula: see text]), cardiac involvement (HR 3.862, [Formula: see text]), and use of maintenance therapy (HR 0.261, [Formula: see text]) as independent predictors of overall survival. Both FFS and BVAS were significant predictors of overall survival. The areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves suggested FFS was a good prediction tool for early mortality in 1 year, with an AUC value of 0.874. Conclusion: Despite the advances in treatment, AAV still carried significant morbidities with high mortality. Clinical predictors and existing scoring systems showed good predictive power on mortality.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":" January","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341724500020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical profile and predictors of mortality of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients in Hong Kong. To compare the accuracy of the latest Five-Factor Score (FFS-2009) and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) in prediction of survival with this local cohort. Methods: A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed AAV patients, from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2022, managed in the Kowloon West Cluster (KWC) hospitals in Hong Kong. Demographic and baseline characteristics, clinical profile, and treatment profile were reviewed. Factors associated with mortality were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model. The performances of FFS and BVAS in mortality prediction were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 83 AAV patients were included in the study. The median age was 70.5 years at diagnosis. Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA; 69.9%) was the most common AAV subtype. The median FFS and BVAS were 2 and 20, respectively. The overall mortality was 45.6% across the study period. Multivariate Cox regression identified age at diagnosis (HR 1.043, [Formula: see text]), stabilized peak serum creatinine (HR 1.002, [Formula: see text]), hemoglobin level (HR 0.754, [Formula: see text]), cardiac involvement (HR 3.862, [Formula: see text]), and use of maintenance therapy (HR 0.261, [Formula: see text]) as independent predictors of overall survival. Both FFS and BVAS were significant predictors of overall survival. The areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves suggested FFS was a good prediction tool for early mortality in 1 year, with an AUC value of 0.874. Conclusion: Despite the advances in treatment, AAV still carried significant morbidities with high mortality. Clinical predictors and existing scoring systems showed good predictive power on mortality.
香港 ANCA 相关性血管炎患者的临床特征、死亡率预测因素以及伯明翰血管炎活动性评分与五因素评分对存活率的影响比较
目的描述香港抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关性脉管炎(AAV)患者的临床概况和死亡率预测因素。比较最新的五因素评分(FFS-2009)和伯明翰脉管炎活动度评分(BVAS)在预测本地队列中患者生存率方面的准确性。研究方法一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象为2011年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间在香港九龙西联院(KWC)接受治疗的新确诊AAV患者。研究回顾了患者的人口统计学特征、基线特征、临床特征和治疗特征。采用 Cox 比例危险模型分析了与死亡率相关的因素。通过接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析了 FFS 和 BVAS 在预测死亡率方面的表现。结果本研究共纳入 83 例 AAV 患者。确诊时的中位年龄为 70.5 岁。显微镜下多血管炎(MPA;69.9%)是最常见的 AAV 亚型。FFS和BVAS的中位数分别为2和20。在整个研究期间,总死亡率为45.6%。多变量 Cox 回归确定诊断时的年龄(HR 1.043,[计算公式:见正文])、稳定的血清肌酐峰值(HR 1.002,[计算公式:见正文])、血红蛋白水平(HR 0.754,[计算公式:见正文])、心脏受累(HR 3.862,[计算公式:见正文])和使用维持治疗(HR 0.261,[计算公式:见正文])是总生存率的独立预测因素。FFS和BVAS均可显著预测总生存期。ROC 曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)表明,FFS 是预测 1 年内早期死亡率的良好工具,AUC 值为 0.874。结论尽管在治疗方面取得了进步,但 AAV 仍会带来严重的并发症和较高的死亡率。临床预测指标和现有评分系统对死亡率有很好的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信