Bulk Fill Composite Resin for Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Study

R. Vanolli, A. M. Cavazzini, Gabriela Spanholi Tamagno, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Júlio Katuhide Ueda, Veridiana Camilotti
{"title":"Bulk Fill Composite Resin for Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Study","authors":"R. Vanolli, A. M. Cavazzini, Gabriela Spanholi Tamagno, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Júlio Katuhide Ueda, Veridiana Camilotti","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i75520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To clinically evaluate for 24 months the restorations of caries-free cervical lesions (CFCL) made with bulk-fill composite resin.  \nMaterials and Methods: Sixty CFCL were selected and divided into two experimental groups: Filtek Z350 (control with conventional composite resin) and Filtek BF (Bulk Fill composite resin). The restorations were evaluated according to the USPHS criteria - marginal adaptation, anatomic form, marginal discoloration, caries formation, postoperative sensitivity, and retention - at the following periods: initial, 7, 30, 180, and 720 days. The results were statistically analyzed using the Friedman ANOVA test (p < 0.05) followed by the Durbin-Conover post-test (p < 0.05). For intra-group analysis, the Wilcoxon non-parametric test was used (p < 0.05). \nResults: Significant differences were observed between the groups, with Bulk Fill resin showing superior clinical performance in terms of marginal adaptation, restoration discoloration, anatomic form, and especially dentin sensitivity. Regarding caries formation and retention, both groups presented similar results. \nConclusion: Bulk-fill composite resins demonstrated superiority in various USPHS criteria in the treatment of caries-free cervical lesions, proving to be a promising material for this treatment context.","PeriodicalId":506708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i75520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To clinically evaluate for 24 months the restorations of caries-free cervical lesions (CFCL) made with bulk-fill composite resin.  Materials and Methods: Sixty CFCL were selected and divided into two experimental groups: Filtek Z350 (control with conventional composite resin) and Filtek BF (Bulk Fill composite resin). The restorations were evaluated according to the USPHS criteria - marginal adaptation, anatomic form, marginal discoloration, caries formation, postoperative sensitivity, and retention - at the following periods: initial, 7, 30, 180, and 720 days. The results were statistically analyzed using the Friedman ANOVA test (p < 0.05) followed by the Durbin-Conover post-test (p < 0.05). For intra-group analysis, the Wilcoxon non-parametric test was used (p < 0.05). Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups, with Bulk Fill resin showing superior clinical performance in terms of marginal adaptation, restoration discoloration, anatomic form, and especially dentin sensitivity. Regarding caries formation and retention, both groups presented similar results. Conclusion: Bulk-fill composite resins demonstrated superiority in various USPHS criteria in the treatment of caries-free cervical lesions, proving to be a promising material for this treatment context.
用于非龋性宫颈病变的团状填充复合树脂:为期 24 个月的随机临床研究
目的对使用大量填充复合树脂制作的无龋牙颈部病变(CFCL)修复体进行为期 24 个月的临床评估。 材料与方法:选取 60 个无龋牙颈部病变,分为两个实验组:Filtek Z350(使用传统复合树脂的对照组)和 Filtek BF(大量填充复合树脂)。根据美国牙科医师协会(USPHS)的标准(边缘适应性、解剖形态、边缘变色、龋齿形成、术后敏感性和保持力),在初始、7、30、180 和 720 天对修复体进行评估。结果采用弗里德曼方差分析(Friedman ANOVA)进行统计分析(P < 0.05),然后进行杜宾-康诺弗后检验(P < 0.05)。组内分析采用 Wilcoxon 非参数检验(P < 0.05)。结果显示各组之间存在显著差异,Bulk Fill 树脂在边缘适应性、修复体变色、解剖形态,尤其是牙本质敏感性方面的临床表现更胜一筹。在龋齿形成和固位方面,两组结果相似。结论在治疗无龋牙颈部病变时,团状填充复合树脂在美国牙科医师协会(USPHS)的各种标准中都表现出了优越性,证明它是一种很有前途的治疗材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信