Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks

Daria Maltseva, Irina Pavlova, Lika Kapustina, Vasilisa Vashchenko, Dalibor Fiala
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks","authors":"Daria Maltseva, Irina Pavlova, Lika Kapustina, Vasilisa Vashchenko, Dalibor Fiala","doi":"10.19181/4m.2023.32.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comparative analysis of two major scientific publication databases: Web of Science Core Collection and eLibrary – to identify their differences and unique opportunities for exploration of bibliographic networks of Russian scientific authors. Current shortage of tools and approaches for collection, processing and analysis of bibliographic data in the Russian language constitutes the relevance of this study. Empirical analysis is based on comparison of respective arrays of scientific publications in the field of sociology over the period of 2010-2021. We propose a set of comparison criteria including those related to the procedure of data access, quality of data management, quantitative and qualitative features of the data. Inspection of the databases based on the proposed criteria aids in identification of intersections between both the collections and the respective qualitative observations about them. We make conclusions regarding the comparative advantages and weaknesses of both databases in regards to their potential as the sole data source for bibliographic studies, and make recommendations for their effective use in research on Russian science.","PeriodicalId":271863,"journal":{"name":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","volume":"80 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2023.32.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of two major scientific publication databases: Web of Science Core Collection and eLibrary – to identify their differences and unique opportunities for exploration of bibliographic networks of Russian scientific authors. Current shortage of tools and approaches for collection, processing and analysis of bibliographic data in the Russian language constitutes the relevance of this study. Empirical analysis is based on comparison of respective arrays of scientific publications in the field of sociology over the period of 2010-2021. We propose a set of comparison criteria including those related to the procedure of data access, quality of data management, quantitative and qualitative features of the data. Inspection of the databases based on the proposed criteria aids in identification of intersections between both the collections and the respective qualitative observations about them. We make conclusions regarding the comparative advantages and weaknesses of both databases in regards to their potential as the sole data source for bibliographic studies, and make recommendations for their effective use in research on Russian science.
对 WoS 和电子图书馆分析书目网络能力的比较分析
本文对两个主要科学出版物数据库进行了比较分析:Web of Science Core Collection 和 eLibrary,以确定它们之间的差异以及探索俄罗斯科学作者书目网络的独特机会。目前缺乏收集、处理和分析俄语书目数据的工具和方法,这是本研究的相关性所在。实证分析基于对 2010-2021 年间社会学领域各自科学出版物阵列的比较。我们提出了一套比较标准,包括与数据访问程序、数据管理质量、数据的定量和定性特征相关的标准。根据建议的标准对数据库进行检查,有助于确定两个数据集之间的交叉点以及对它们各自的定性观察。我们就这两个数据库作为书目研究唯一数据源的潜力方面的相对优势和劣势得出结论,并就在俄罗斯科学研究中有效使用这两个数据库提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信