Questions and Responses to the Legitimacy of Criminal Reconciliation: The Approach is Based on the Valueless Behavior

Juncheng Chen, Hui Lv
{"title":"Questions and Responses to the Legitimacy of Criminal Reconciliation: The Approach is Based on the Valueless Behavior","authors":"Juncheng Chen, Hui Lv","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/57/20240085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of promoting the construction of the rule of law in China, there have been emerging legislation, there are also behind the abolition of legislation, criminal reconciliation system through legislation also formally entered the investigation stage in China. But at the same time, the controversy about this system has never stopped, and the important status of money, a sensitive thing in criminal reconciliation, makes the public full of doubts and incomprehensibilities about this system. From loss reduced the things appear in the beginning, some scholars begin to looking for reliable for its legitimacy basis to prove the existence of this system is reasonable, until the system has the breakthrough on the legislation, but not for the public's confusion a systemic response and cracking. valueless behavior theory in considering the twin issues of legal interest undermines the effectiveness of criminal punishment as a deterrent, rendering it less impactful compared to alternative approaches. Consequently, within the framework of such punitive measures, accommodating a criminal reconciliation system becomes challenging.","PeriodicalId":506419,"journal":{"name":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","volume":"79 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/57/20240085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The process of promoting the construction of the rule of law in China, there have been emerging legislation, there are also behind the abolition of legislation, criminal reconciliation system through legislation also formally entered the investigation stage in China. But at the same time, the controversy about this system has never stopped, and the important status of money, a sensitive thing in criminal reconciliation, makes the public full of doubts and incomprehensibilities about this system. From loss reduced the things appear in the beginning, some scholars begin to looking for reliable for its legitimacy basis to prove the existence of this system is reasonable, until the system has the breakthrough on the legislation, but not for the public's confusion a systemic response and cracking. valueless behavior theory in considering the twin issues of legal interest undermines the effectiveness of criminal punishment as a deterrent, rendering it less impactful compared to alternative approaches. Consequently, within the framework of such punitive measures, accommodating a criminal reconciliation system becomes challenging.
对刑事和解合法性的质疑与回应:基于无价值行为的方法
在我国推进法治建设的进程中,有不断涌现的立法,也有立法废止的背后,刑事和解制度通过立法也正式在我国进入了探究阶段。但与此同时,关于这一制度的争议也从未停止过,金钱这一敏感物在刑事和解中的重要地位,让公众对这一制度充满了质疑和不理解。从损失减少的事情出现之初,一些学者就开始为其寻找可靠的合法性依据来证明这一制度存在的合理性,直到这一制度在立法上有了突破,却没有对公众的困惑进行系统的回应和破解。"无价值行为理论 "在考虑法益的双重问题时,削弱了刑罚的威慑力,使其与其他方法相比影响力大打折扣。因此,在这种惩罚措施的框架内,容纳刑事和解制度变得具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信