Replies to Queries in Gynecologic Oncology by Bard, Bing and the Google Assistant

Edward J. Pavlik, Dharani D. Ramaiah, Taylor A. Rives, Allison L. Swiecki-Sikora, Jamie M. Land
{"title":"Replies to Queries in Gynecologic Oncology by Bard, Bing and the Google Assistant","authors":"Edward J. Pavlik, Dharani D. Ramaiah, Taylor A. Rives, Allison L. Swiecki-Sikora, Jamie M. Land","doi":"10.3390/biomedinformatics4030097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When women receive a diagnosis of a gynecologic malignancy, they can have questions about their diagnosis or treatment that can result in voice queries to virtual assistants for more information. Recent advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the landscape of medical information accessibility. The Google virtual assistant (VA) outperformed Siri, Alexa and Cortana in voice queries presented prior to the explosive implementation of AI in early 2023. The efforts presented here focus on determining if advances in AI in the last 12 months have improved the accuracy of Google VA responses related to gynecologic oncology. Previous questions were utilized to form a common basis for queries prior to 2023 and responses in 2024. Correct answers were obtained from the UpToDate medical resource. Responses related to gynecologic oncology were obtained using Google VA, as well as the generative AI chatbots Google Bard/Gemini and Microsoft Bing-Copilot. The AI narrative responses varied in length and positioning of answers within the response. Google Bard/Gemini achieved an 87.5% accuracy rate, while Microsoft Bing-Copilot reached 83.3%. In contrast, the Google VA’s accuracy in audible responses improved from 18% prior to 2023 to 63% in 2024. While the accuracy of the Google VA has improved in the last year, it underperformed Google Bard/Gemini and Microsoft Bing-Copilot so there is considerable room for further improved accuracy.","PeriodicalId":72394,"journal":{"name":"BioMedInformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedInformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4030097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When women receive a diagnosis of a gynecologic malignancy, they can have questions about their diagnosis or treatment that can result in voice queries to virtual assistants for more information. Recent advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the landscape of medical information accessibility. The Google virtual assistant (VA) outperformed Siri, Alexa and Cortana in voice queries presented prior to the explosive implementation of AI in early 2023. The efforts presented here focus on determining if advances in AI in the last 12 months have improved the accuracy of Google VA responses related to gynecologic oncology. Previous questions were utilized to form a common basis for queries prior to 2023 and responses in 2024. Correct answers were obtained from the UpToDate medical resource. Responses related to gynecologic oncology were obtained using Google VA, as well as the generative AI chatbots Google Bard/Gemini and Microsoft Bing-Copilot. The AI narrative responses varied in length and positioning of answers within the response. Google Bard/Gemini achieved an 87.5% accuracy rate, while Microsoft Bing-Copilot reached 83.3%. In contrast, the Google VA’s accuracy in audible responses improved from 18% prior to 2023 to 63% in 2024. While the accuracy of the Google VA has improved in the last year, it underperformed Google Bard/Gemini and Microsoft Bing-Copilot so there is considerable room for further improved accuracy.
巴德、必应和谷歌助手对妇科肿瘤学查询的回复
当女性被诊断出患有妇科恶性肿瘤时,她们可能会对诊断或治疗产生疑问,从而通过语音向虚拟助手询问更多信息。人工智能(AI)的最新进展改变了医疗信息的可及性。在 2023 年初人工智能爆炸性发展之前,谷歌虚拟助手(VA)在语音查询方面的表现优于 Siri、Alexa 和 Cortana。本文介绍的工作重点是确定过去 12 个月中人工智能的进步是否提高了谷歌虚拟助手回答妇科肿瘤相关问题的准确性。以前的问题被用来作为 2023 年之前查询和 2024 年回复的共同基础。正确答案来自 UpToDate 医学资源。与妇科肿瘤学相关的回答通过 Google VA 以及生成式人工智能聊天机器人 Google Bard/Gemini 和 Microsoft Bing-Copilot 获得。人工智能叙述式回复的长度和答案在回复中的位置各不相同。谷歌 Bard/Gemini 的准确率达到了 87.5%,而微软 Bing-Copilot 则达到了 83.3%。相比之下,谷歌虚拟现实的有声回答准确率从 2023 年之前的 18% 提高到 2024 年的 63%。虽然谷歌虚拟现实的准确率在去年有所提高,但它的表现不如谷歌Bard/Gemini和微软Bing-Copilot,因此准确率还有很大的进一步提高空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信