Patient Satisfaction with the Quality of Nursing Care in the Outpatient Department of the Hospital

Malihah Ramadhani Rum, Oci Etri Nursanty
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction with the Quality of Nursing Care in the Outpatient Department of the Hospital","authors":"Malihah Ramadhani Rum, Oci Etri Nursanty","doi":"10.33221/jiiki.v14i02.3386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient satisfaction in healthcare services is crucial as it reflects the quality of service provided by the institution. Knowing the level of patient satisfaction is very useful for related institutions to evaluate ongoing programs and identify areas needing improvement. The quality of hospital services consists of two aspects, meeting established quality standards and satisfying customer (patient) needs. Hospitals need to focus on providing services that prioritize customer satisfaction. To enhance the quality of healthcare services, it can begin with evaluating each element contributing to patient satisfaction. \nObjectives: The objective of this study is to assess the level of patient satisfaction in the Outpatient Department so that the hospital can conduct evaluations and improve services according to patient needs. \nMethods: This study is a quantitative research using a descriptive survey approach. The population in this study consists of patients in the outpatient department in September 2023, totaling 3,112 patients. The sample size was determined using Slovin's formula, and the calculated sample size for this study is 97 patients. \nResults: Patient satisfaction with tangibles was found 1% rated it as bad, 8% as poor, 30% as good, and 60% as excellent. Reliability was found that 2% rated it as bad, 9% as poor, 31% as good, and 58% as excellent. Responsiveness was found that 1% rated it as bad, 5% as poor, 32% as good, and 62% as excellent. Assurance was found that 1% rated it as bad, 5% as poor, 32% as good, and 62% as excellent. Empathy was found that 1% rated it as bad, 11% as poor, 30% as good, and 58% as excellent. \nConclusion: Patient satisfaction regarding nursing care services rated as excellent in the Outpatient Department of Ali Sibroh Malisi Hospital, assessed across five dimensions-tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy-averages below 70%. This is significantly far from the minimum service standard set by the Ministry of Health, which is 95%.","PeriodicalId":377205,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan Indonesia","volume":"29 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33221/jiiki.v14i02.3386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction in healthcare services is crucial as it reflects the quality of service provided by the institution. Knowing the level of patient satisfaction is very useful for related institutions to evaluate ongoing programs and identify areas needing improvement. The quality of hospital services consists of two aspects, meeting established quality standards and satisfying customer (patient) needs. Hospitals need to focus on providing services that prioritize customer satisfaction. To enhance the quality of healthcare services, it can begin with evaluating each element contributing to patient satisfaction. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the level of patient satisfaction in the Outpatient Department so that the hospital can conduct evaluations and improve services according to patient needs. Methods: This study is a quantitative research using a descriptive survey approach. The population in this study consists of patients in the outpatient department in September 2023, totaling 3,112 patients. The sample size was determined using Slovin's formula, and the calculated sample size for this study is 97 patients. Results: Patient satisfaction with tangibles was found 1% rated it as bad, 8% as poor, 30% as good, and 60% as excellent. Reliability was found that 2% rated it as bad, 9% as poor, 31% as good, and 58% as excellent. Responsiveness was found that 1% rated it as bad, 5% as poor, 32% as good, and 62% as excellent. Assurance was found that 1% rated it as bad, 5% as poor, 32% as good, and 62% as excellent. Empathy was found that 1% rated it as bad, 11% as poor, 30% as good, and 58% as excellent. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction regarding nursing care services rated as excellent in the Outpatient Department of Ali Sibroh Malisi Hospital, assessed across five dimensions-tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy-averages below 70%. This is significantly far from the minimum service standard set by the Ministry of Health, which is 95%.
病人对医院门诊部护理质量的满意度
背景:患者对医疗服务的满意度至关重要,因为它反映了医疗机构的服务质量。了解患者满意度的高低对相关机构评估正在进行的项目和确定需要改进的地方非常有用。医院服务质量包括两个方面,一是达到既定的质量标准,二是满足客户(患者)的需求。医院需要把重点放在提供客户满意度优先的服务上。要提高医疗服务质量,可以从评估患者满意度的各个要素入手。目标:本研究旨在评估门诊部的患者满意度,以便医院根据患者需求进行评估并改进服务。研究方法本研究采用描述性调查法进行定量研究。研究对象包括 2023 年 9 月在门诊部就诊的 3112 名患者。样本量使用斯洛文公式确定,计算得出本研究的样本量为 97 名患者。研究结果结果发现,患者对有形物品的满意度有 1%的人认为不好,8%的人认为差,30%的人认为好,60%的人认为优秀。可靠性方面,2%的患者认为不好,9%的患者认为差,31%的患者认为好,58%的患者认为优秀。调查发现,1% 的人认为响应性差,5% 的人认为响应性差,32% 的人认为响应性好,62% 的人认为响应性好。1% 的人认为 "保证 "不好,5% 的人认为 "差",32% 的人认为 "好",62% 的人认为 "优秀"。调查发现,1% 的人认为 "同理心 "不好,11% 的人认为 "差",30% 的人认为 "好",58% 的人认为 "优"。结论阿里-西布罗-马利西医院门诊部的护理服务被评为 "优秀",在五个维度(切身感受、可靠性、响应性、保证和移情)的评估中,患者的平均满意度低于 70%。这与卫生部规定的最低服务标准(95%)相差甚远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信