Translation and validation of the Portuguese version of the discrimination in medical settings scale: a cross-sectional study with Portuguese Roma

Tiago Melo Pereira, Sara Martinho, Miguel Barbosa
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Portuguese version of the discrimination in medical settings scale: a cross-sectional study with Portuguese Roma","authors":"Tiago Melo Pereira, Sara Martinho, Miguel Barbosa","doi":"10.1108/ijmhsc-01-2024-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nPerceived discrimination in medical setting is associated to adverse healthcare outcomes. Yet, few tools exist for assessing such discrimination among patients in Portugal. This study aimed to validate the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale for the Portuguese Roma population, explore their experiences of healthcare discrimination and analyze the association between perceived discrimination, health perception and healthcare trust.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this cross-sectional study, 84 Roma adults (60,7% women) completed the DMS, along with microaggression assessments, health perception and healthcare trust evaluations.\n\nFindings\nThe seven-item DMS scale yielded a one-factor structure that explained 71.80% of variance, with strong reliability (a = 0.89). The average DMS-measured perceived discrimination was 2.46. Discrimination correlated inversely with health perception and was strongly negatively associated to trust in healthcare.\n\nOriginality/value\nThe DMS scale exhibited reliability, single-dimensionality and validity among the Roma. High perceived discrimination in medical settings among Portuguese Roma was notably associated with individual health perception and healthcare trust.\n","PeriodicalId":503778,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-01-2024-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Perceived discrimination in medical setting is associated to adverse healthcare outcomes. Yet, few tools exist for assessing such discrimination among patients in Portugal. This study aimed to validate the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale for the Portuguese Roma population, explore their experiences of healthcare discrimination and analyze the association between perceived discrimination, health perception and healthcare trust. Design/methodology/approach In this cross-sectional study, 84 Roma adults (60,7% women) completed the DMS, along with microaggression assessments, health perception and healthcare trust evaluations. Findings The seven-item DMS scale yielded a one-factor structure that explained 71.80% of variance, with strong reliability (a = 0.89). The average DMS-measured perceived discrimination was 2.46. Discrimination correlated inversely with health perception and was strongly negatively associated to trust in healthcare. Originality/value The DMS scale exhibited reliability, single-dimensionality and validity among the Roma. High perceived discrimination in medical settings among Portuguese Roma was notably associated with individual health perception and healthcare trust.
葡萄牙语版医疗环境歧视量表的翻译和验证:一项针对葡萄牙罗姆人的横断面研究
目的 在医疗环境中感受到的歧视与不良医疗结果有关。然而,目前很少有工具可用于评估葡萄牙患者所遭受的歧视。本研究旨在验证葡萄牙罗姆人的医疗环境歧视量表(DMS),探索他们的医疗歧视经历,并分析感知到的歧视、健康感知和医疗信任之间的关联。研究结果由七个项目组成的DMS量表为单因素结构,可解释71.80%的方差,具有很高的可靠性(a = 0.89)。DMS测量的平均歧视感为2.46。歧视与健康感知成反比,与对医疗保健的信任呈强烈的负相关。葡萄牙罗姆人在医疗环境中感知到的高度歧视与个人的健康感知和医疗信任度明显相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信