Comparative Test of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) In Suwung Estuary Using Sentinel-2B and Landsat 8 Imagery

I. M. Yuliara, N. Ratini
{"title":"Comparative Test of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) In Suwung Estuary Using Sentinel-2B and Landsat 8 Imagery","authors":"I. M. Yuliara, N. Ratini","doi":"10.9734/ajr2p/2024/v8i3165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine and compare the accuracy of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) estimates using Sentinel-2B and Landsat 8 satellite imagery in the Suwung estuary, Denpasar city, Bali. The TSS measurements in the laboratory were carried out on 20 samples for Sentinel-2B (LabS) and 20 samples for Landsat 8 (LabL) which were taken at the same coordinates. Regression and correlation methods are used to validate TSS estimates against laboratory TSS. Accuracy tests to determine the level of estimation error use root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean relative error (MRE). Comparison of estimation accuracy is determined by differences in error rate calculation results. The results of regression analysis and accuracy tests for paired samples show a very strong correlation, both in pair 1 (LabS with Sentinel-2B) namely r=0.9484 and in pair 2 (LabL with Landsat 8) it is r=0.8910, and the error rate for pair 1 is smaller than pair 2. The implications of these results show that the accuracy of the TSS estimation of the Laili algorithm using Sentinel-2B is better than Landsat 8.","PeriodicalId":8529,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Research and Reviews in Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Research and Reviews in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajr2p/2024/v8i3165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine and compare the accuracy of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) estimates using Sentinel-2B and Landsat 8 satellite imagery in the Suwung estuary, Denpasar city, Bali. The TSS measurements in the laboratory were carried out on 20 samples for Sentinel-2B (LabS) and 20 samples for Landsat 8 (LabL) which were taken at the same coordinates. Regression and correlation methods are used to validate TSS estimates against laboratory TSS. Accuracy tests to determine the level of estimation error use root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean relative error (MRE). Comparison of estimation accuracy is determined by differences in error rate calculation results. The results of regression analysis and accuracy tests for paired samples show a very strong correlation, both in pair 1 (LabS with Sentinel-2B) namely r=0.9484 and in pair 2 (LabL with Landsat 8) it is r=0.8910, and the error rate for pair 1 is smaller than pair 2. The implications of these results show that the accuracy of the TSS estimation of the Laili algorithm using Sentinel-2B is better than Landsat 8.
利用哨兵-2B 和大地遥感卫星 8 号成像对水汶河口的总悬浮固体 (TSS) 进行比较测试
本研究旨在确定和比较使用哨兵-2B 和大地遥感卫星 8 号卫星图像对巴厘岛登巴萨市苏翁河口的总悬浮固体(TSS)估算值的准确性。实验室中的总悬浮固体测量是在同一坐标上对 20 个哨兵-2B(LabS)样本和 20 个大地遥感卫星 8(LabL)样本进行的。使用回归和相关方法来验证实验室总悬浮固体的估计值。使用均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和平均相对误差 (MRE) 进行精度测试,以确定估算误差水平。通过误差率计算结果的差异来确定估算精度的比较。成对样本的回归分析和精度测试结果显示出很强的相关性,成对 1(LabS 与 Sentinel-2B)的相关性为 r=0.9484,成对 2(LabL 与 Landsat 8)的相关性为 r=0.8910,且成对 1 的误差率小于成对 2。这些结果的含义表明,使用 Sentinel-2B 的 Laili 算法的 TSS 估计精度优于 Landsat 8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信