Survival and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Post-Extraction Implants versus Delayed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oral Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.3390/oral4030027
Alba Portal-Solera, Beatriz Pardal-Peláez
{"title":"Survival and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Post-Extraction Implants versus Delayed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Alba Portal-Solera, Beatriz Pardal-Peláez","doi":"10.3390/oral4030027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a series of protocols regarding the placement of dental implants after tooth extraction. The advantages and disadvantages that determine the procedure and timing of each dental implant placement process are key to achieving success. The main objective of this study was to elucidate/establish/determine whether there are differences in the survival and marginal bone loss between implants placed immediately after placement and those placed following a delayed protocol. A search was conducted in Pubmed, BVS, and Cochrane. Eleven randomized clinical trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected, and a meta-analysis was carried out to compare the implant failures and marginal bone loss between study groups. The analysis showed that delayed implant placement had fewer failures (odds ratio, fixed effects: 3.47 [CI: 95% (1.17, 10.48)]). As regards marginal bone loss, there was a tendency towards less tissue loss in the delayed placement group (mean difference, random effects: 0.11 [CI: 95% (−0.10, 0.33)]); however, further research is needed to evaluate this variable.","PeriodicalId":19685,"journal":{"name":"Oral","volume":"117 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/oral4030027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are a series of protocols regarding the placement of dental implants after tooth extraction. The advantages and disadvantages that determine the procedure and timing of each dental implant placement process are key to achieving success. The main objective of this study was to elucidate/establish/determine whether there are differences in the survival and marginal bone loss between implants placed immediately after placement and those placed following a delayed protocol. A search was conducted in Pubmed, BVS, and Cochrane. Eleven randomized clinical trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected, and a meta-analysis was carried out to compare the implant failures and marginal bone loss between study groups. The analysis showed that delayed implant placement had fewer failures (odds ratio, fixed effects: 3.47 [CI: 95% (1.17, 10.48)]). As regards marginal bone loss, there was a tendency towards less tissue loss in the delayed placement group (mean difference, random effects: 0.11 [CI: 95% (−0.10, 0.33)]); however, further research is needed to evaluate this variable.
拔牙后即刻种植体与延迟种植体的存活率和边缘骨损失:系统回顾和元分析
拔牙后植入牙科植入体有一系列的规范。决定每种牙科植入物植入过程和时机的优缺点是取得成功的关键。本研究的主要目的是阐明/建立/确定种植体植入后立即植入和延迟植入在存活率和边缘骨质流失方面是否存在差异。研究人员在 Pubmed、BVS 和 Cochrane 中进行了搜索。筛选出了 11 项符合纳入标准的随机临床试验,并进行了荟萃分析,以比较不同研究组之间的种植体失败率和边缘骨质流失情况。分析结果显示,延迟植入种植体的失败率较低(几率比,固定效应:3.47 [CI: 95% (1.17, 10.48)])。在边缘骨损失方面,延迟植入组的组织损失更少(随机效应,平均差:0.11 [CI: 95% (1.17, 10.48]):0.11 [CI: 95% (-0.10, 0.33)]);不过,还需要进一步的研究来评估这一变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信