Evaluation of a short-structured learner-centric training program on rational drug prescribing for medical interns: A quasi-experimental study

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
A. Nishanthi, Rajalakshmi Mahendran, K. Ganapathy, M. Shanthi
{"title":"Evaluation of a short-structured learner-centric training program on rational drug prescribing for medical interns: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"A. Nishanthi, Rajalakshmi Mahendran, K. Ganapathy, M. Shanthi","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_129_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Rational drug prescribing skills of interns remain bleak despite clinical pharmacology training during their second year, warranting the need for further training. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-structured learner-centric training program using the World Health Organization (WHO) guide to good prescribing in improving interns’ knowledge of rational drug use and their rational drug prescribing skills.\n \n \n \n This quasi-experimental study was implemented at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. We conducted a short-structured learner-centric training program on rational drug prescribing for interns in September 2022, using the WHO guide to good prescribing. The medical interns who consented to participate were included in the study. A pre-test was administered at the start of the training, followed by a post-test and feedback questions at the end of the program. Statistical tests used for quantitative data were the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and McNemar’s Chi-square test. Qualitative data were analyzed using manual content analysis.\n \n \n \n Of the 77 interns who attended the training program, 73 provided consent and completed both the pre-test and the post-test. Their mean age was 22 years, with a slight preponderance of female participants (53.4%). Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the median (interquartile range) total scores from 52 (44.6 – 60) to 84 (70 – 88) after the training (P = 0.001), out of a maximum score of 93. Also, a significantly greater number of them wrote legible prescriptions (grade 4/excellent – 44 in pre-test vs 52 in post-test; P = 0.001) after the training.\n \n \n \n The short-structured learner-centric training program based on the WHO guide to good prescribing significantly improved the knowledge of rational drug use and rational drug prescribing skills among medical interns.\n","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_129_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rational drug prescribing skills of interns remain bleak despite clinical pharmacology training during their second year, warranting the need for further training. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-structured learner-centric training program using the World Health Organization (WHO) guide to good prescribing in improving interns’ knowledge of rational drug use and their rational drug prescribing skills. This quasi-experimental study was implemented at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. We conducted a short-structured learner-centric training program on rational drug prescribing for interns in September 2022, using the WHO guide to good prescribing. The medical interns who consented to participate were included in the study. A pre-test was administered at the start of the training, followed by a post-test and feedback questions at the end of the program. Statistical tests used for quantitative data were the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and McNemar’s Chi-square test. Qualitative data were analyzed using manual content analysis. Of the 77 interns who attended the training program, 73 provided consent and completed both the pre-test and the post-test. Their mean age was 22 years, with a slight preponderance of female participants (53.4%). Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the median (interquartile range) total scores from 52 (44.6 – 60) to 84 (70 – 88) after the training (P = 0.001), out of a maximum score of 93. Also, a significantly greater number of them wrote legible prescriptions (grade 4/excellent – 44 in pre-test vs 52 in post-test; P = 0.001) after the training. The short-structured learner-centric training program based on the WHO guide to good prescribing significantly improved the knowledge of rational drug use and rational drug prescribing skills among medical interns.
对以学习者为中心的实习医生合理用药短期培训项目的评估:准实验研究
摘要 尽管实习生在第二年接受了临床药理学培训,但他们的合理用药处方技能仍然很差,因此需要进一步培训。本研究旨在评估采用世界卫生组织(WHO)良好处方指南开展的以学习者为中心的短期结构化培训项目在提高实习生合理用药知识和合理处方技能方面的效果。 这项准实验研究在印度南部的一家三级教学医院实施。2022 年 9 月,我们采用世界卫生组织的良好处方指南,为实习生开展了以学习者为中心的短期结构化合理用药培训项目。同意参与的医学实习生被纳入研究。培训开始时进行了前测,培训结束时进行了后测并提出了反馈问题。定量数据的统计检验采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 McNemar 的卡方检验。定性数据采用人工内容分析法进行分析。 在参加培训项目的 77 名实习生中,73 人同意并完成了前测和后测。他们的平均年龄为 22 岁,其中女性略占多数(53.4%)。总体而言,参加培训后,总分的中位数(四分位间距)从 52 分(44.6 - 60 分)提高到 84 分(70 - 88 分)(P = 0.001),其中最高分为 93 分。此外,培训后书写处方清晰可辨的人数也明显增加(4 级/优秀 - 测试前为 44 人,测试后为 52 人;P = 0.001)。 以世界卫生组织良好处方指南为基础、以学习者为中心的短期培训项目显著提高了实习医生的合理用药知识和合理处方技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信