The association of continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic parameters in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A prospective observational study

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Abhishek Chaubey, Deepika Chaubey, Abhishek Dwivedi, Saurabh Dwivedi, Tanu Mishra
{"title":"The association of continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic parameters in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A prospective observational study","authors":"Abhishek Chaubey, Deepika Chaubey, Abhishek Dwivedi, Saurabh Dwivedi, Tanu Mishra","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1950_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Uncontrolled glycemic parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are a major concern. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetics on insulin therapy.\n \n \n \n This prospective observational study was done in the Outpatient Department of General Medicine from January 1, 2021 till December 31, 2021 on patients with confirmed T2DM and on insulin therapy. Patients underwent detailed history and physical examination. The CGM device was inserted to record blood glucose levels throughout the day and night for monitoring. Parameters like glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), post-paradial blood sugar (PPBS), and lipid profile parameters [cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)] were compared at baseline and after a follow-up of 3 months. P-value < 0.05 was used to indicate significant difference.\n \n \n \n Of 107 patients screened, 100 were included in the study and seven were excluded. The mean age of the patients was 60.6 ± 11.1 years. Fifty-six (56%) of the patients were males, and 44 (44%) were females. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 ± 2.4 kg/m2. Compared to baseline values, after 3 months of CGM, there was significantly decreased HbA1c (9.41 ± 0.83 vs 9.87 ± 1.16 g%, P < 0.001), FBS (194.640 ± 22.4587 vs 205.10 ± 35.7758 mg/dl, P = 0.002), PPBS (271.160 ± 29.1235 vs 299.180 ± 42.3798, P < 0.001), cholesterol (184.470 ± 28.5192 vs 198.430 ± 38.8367 mg/dl, P < 0.001), LDL (102.410 ± 22.8973 vs 112.040 ± 30.8859, P < 0.001), and TG (140.890 ± 18.0979 vs 146.730 ± 20.8665 mg/dl, P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n There was a significant improvement in the glycemic parameters and lipid profile parameters with the adoption of CGM. Overall, CGM is a novel method for practical use for management of patients with T2DM.\n","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1950_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Uncontrolled glycemic parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are a major concern. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetics on insulin therapy. This prospective observational study was done in the Outpatient Department of General Medicine from January 1, 2021 till December 31, 2021 on patients with confirmed T2DM and on insulin therapy. Patients underwent detailed history and physical examination. The CGM device was inserted to record blood glucose levels throughout the day and night for monitoring. Parameters like glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), post-paradial blood sugar (PPBS), and lipid profile parameters [cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)] were compared at baseline and after a follow-up of 3 months. P-value < 0.05 was used to indicate significant difference. Of 107 patients screened, 100 were included in the study and seven were excluded. The mean age of the patients was 60.6 ± 11.1 years. Fifty-six (56%) of the patients were males, and 44 (44%) were females. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 ± 2.4 kg/m2. Compared to baseline values, after 3 months of CGM, there was significantly decreased HbA1c (9.41 ± 0.83 vs 9.87 ± 1.16 g%, P < 0.001), FBS (194.640 ± 22.4587 vs 205.10 ± 35.7758 mg/dl, P = 0.002), PPBS (271.160 ± 29.1235 vs 299.180 ± 42.3798, P < 0.001), cholesterol (184.470 ± 28.5192 vs 198.430 ± 38.8367 mg/dl, P < 0.001), LDL (102.410 ± 22.8973 vs 112.040 ± 30.8859, P < 0.001), and TG (140.890 ± 18.0979 vs 146.730 ± 20.8665 mg/dl, P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in the glycemic parameters and lipid profile parameters with the adoption of CGM. Overall, CGM is a novel method for practical use for management of patients with T2DM.
持续葡萄糖监测与血糖参数在未得到控制的 2 型糖尿病患者中的关联:前瞻性观察研究
摘要 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖参数失控是一个主要问题。本研究旨在评估持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)对接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果。 这项前瞻性观察研究于 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日在全科门诊部进行,对象是确诊为 T2DM 并正在接受胰岛素治疗的患者。患者接受了详细的病史和体格检查。插入 CGM 设备,记录白天和晚上的血糖水平,以便进行监测。比较了基线时和随访 3 个月后的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FBS)、paradial 后血糖(PPBS)和血脂谱参数[胆固醇、甘油三酯(TG)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)]。P值小于0.05表示差异显著。 在接受筛查的 107 名患者中,100 人被纳入研究,7 人被排除在外。患者的平均年龄为(60.6 ± 11.1)岁。56名(56%)患者为男性,44名(44%)患者为女性。平均体重指数(BMI)为 22.9 ± 2.4 kg/m2。与基线值相比,使用 CGM 3 个月后,HbA1c(9.41 ± 0.83 vs 9.87 ± 1.16 g%,P < 0.001)、FBS(194.640 ± 22.4587 vs 205.10 ± 35.7758 mg/dl,P = 0.002)、PPBS(271.160 ± 29.1235 vs 299.180±42.3798,P<0.001)、胆固醇(184.470±28.5192 vs 198.430±38.8367 mg/dl,P<0.001)、低密度脂蛋白(102.410±22.8973 vs 112.040±30.8859,P<0.001)和总胆固醇(140.890±18.0979 vs 146.730±20.8665 mg/dl,P<0.001)。 采用 CGM 后,血糖指标和血脂指标均有明显改善。总之,CGM 是一种新型方法,可用于 T2DM 患者的实际管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信