Anticoagulation Usage and Thrombolytic Therapy in Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation Associated Ischaemic Stroke.

J. Harbison, J. McCormack, O. Brych, R. Collins, N. O’Connell, P. J. Kelly, T. Cassidy
{"title":"Anticoagulation Usage and Thrombolytic Therapy in Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation Associated Ischaemic Stroke.","authors":"J. Harbison, J. McCormack, O. Brych, R. Collins, N. O’Connell, P. J. Kelly, T. Cassidy","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.28.24311145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atrial Fibrillation (AF) has been Identified as the single largest cause of ischaemic stroke in the Irish population. Previous research showed that widespread adoption of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis had not been associated with a reduction in AF associated stroke prevalence. The Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS) undertook a more detailed study to determine the characteristics of anticoagulation practice in AF associated stroke particularly adherence to prescribing guidelines and effect on thrombolysis rate. Methods: Data from INAS were analysed for the period 2017-2022 inclusive. An enhanced dataset with additional questions about adherence with prescription and International Normalized Ratio (INR) control was collected for 2022 was also considered separately. Results. Complete AF Data were available on 22485 of 26829 incidents admitted over this period. Of these, 19260 (85.6%) were ischaemic strokes, mean age was 71.8 and 57.1% were male. In 5321 of these cases, the AF was identified and in 2835 (53.3%) recognized before the stroke and 2281 (80.4%) had been prescribed anticoagulation. The population with previously unknown AF were significantly younger on average than those on anticoagulation (76.8 years vs. 79.1 years (p<0.0001, t-test)), Group C; 78.8 years (p<0.0001), they were also much more likely to have received thrombolysis (17.3 % vs. 4.0% (Chi Sq, p<0.0001)). There were 4999 stroke in 2022, 4272 (85.4%) were ischemic and 1270 (29.7%) of these were AF associated. Of the 660 total strokes, 597 (90.5%) anticoagulated at presentation were receiving DOACs, of which 557 were ischaemic. Forty-eight (9.5%) had their anticoagulation paused and 40 admitted to poor compliance (7.9%). Conclusion. Nearly half of people with AF detected after stroke was previously unknown. Those with known AF were mainly appropriately treated with DOACs and constitute breakthrough strokes. Subjects receiving DOACs were much less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy even than those taking Warfarin.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24311145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) has been Identified as the single largest cause of ischaemic stroke in the Irish population. Previous research showed that widespread adoption of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis had not been associated with a reduction in AF associated stroke prevalence. The Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS) undertook a more detailed study to determine the characteristics of anticoagulation practice in AF associated stroke particularly adherence to prescribing guidelines and effect on thrombolysis rate. Methods: Data from INAS were analysed for the period 2017-2022 inclusive. An enhanced dataset with additional questions about adherence with prescription and International Normalized Ratio (INR) control was collected for 2022 was also considered separately. Results. Complete AF Data were available on 22485 of 26829 incidents admitted over this period. Of these, 19260 (85.6%) were ischaemic strokes, mean age was 71.8 and 57.1% were male. In 5321 of these cases, the AF was identified and in 2835 (53.3%) recognized before the stroke and 2281 (80.4%) had been prescribed anticoagulation. The population with previously unknown AF were significantly younger on average than those on anticoagulation (76.8 years vs. 79.1 years (p<0.0001, t-test)), Group C; 78.8 years (p<0.0001), they were also much more likely to have received thrombolysis (17.3 % vs. 4.0% (Chi Sq, p<0.0001)). There were 4999 stroke in 2022, 4272 (85.4%) were ischemic and 1270 (29.7%) of these were AF associated. Of the 660 total strokes, 597 (90.5%) anticoagulated at presentation were receiving DOACs, of which 557 were ischaemic. Forty-eight (9.5%) had their anticoagulation paused and 40 admitted to poor compliance (7.9%). Conclusion. Nearly half of people with AF detected after stroke was previously unknown. Those with known AF were mainly appropriately treated with DOACs and constitute breakthrough strokes. Subjects receiving DOACs were much less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy even than those taking Warfarin.
心房颤动伴缺血性中风患者的抗凝用法和溶栓疗法
心房颤动(房颤)已被确定为爱尔兰人口中导致缺血性中风的最大原因。先前的研究表明,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)预防措施的广泛采用与心房颤动相关中风发病率的降低无关。爱尔兰国家卒中审计(INAS)开展了一项更详细的研究,以确定心房颤动相关性卒中的抗凝实践特点,尤其是对处方指南的遵守情况以及对溶栓率的影响。研究方法:分析了 INAS 在 2017-2022 年(含 2022 年)期间的数据。此外,还单独考虑了 2022 年收集的增强型数据集,其中包含有关处方依从性和国际正常化比率 (INR) 控制的附加问题。结果在此期间收治的 26829 例患者中,有 22485 例获得了完整的房颤数据。其中,19260 例(85.6%)为缺血性脑卒中,平均年龄为 71.8 岁,57.1% 为男性。在这些病例中,有 5321 例在中风前已发现房颤,其中 2835 例(53.3%)在中风前已被确认,2281 例(80.4%)在中风前已接受抗凝治疗。先前未知房颤的患者平均年龄明显小于接受抗凝治疗的患者(76.8 岁对 79.1 岁(p<0.0001,t 检验)),C 组为 78.8 岁(p<0.0001),他们也更有可能接受溶栓治疗(17.3% 对 4.0%(Chi Sq,p<0.0001))。2022 年共有 4999 例中风,其中 4272 例(85.4%)为缺血性中风,1270 例(29.7%)与房颤有关。在总共 660 例脑卒中中,有 597 例(90.5%)在发病时接受了 DOAC 抗凝治疗,其中 557 例为缺血性脑卒中。48人(9.5%)暂停了抗凝治疗,40人(7.9%)承认依从性差。结论中风后发现的房颤患者中,近一半之前并不知晓。已知房颤的患者主要接受了 DOACs 的适当治疗,并构成了突破性中风。与服用华法林的患者相比,服用 DOACs 的患者接受溶栓治疗的可能性要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信